Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:07:42.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2006

Duane Swank
Duane Swank
Affiliation:
Marquette University, Milwaukee, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central argument is that the highly visible 1980s market-conforming tax reform in the United States should be especially important in shaping subsequent tax policies in other polities. There are substantial reasons to believe, however, that domestic political and institutional forces will shape policymaker assessment of the benefits and costs of neoliberal reforms: the strength of right parties and the degree to which the median voter has moved right should condition adoption of neoliberal tax policy; the institutions of national and sector-coordinated capitalism should also slow the enactment of neoliberal tax reforms. I assess these arguments with empirical models of 1981–98 tax rates on capital in sixteen nations. I find that changes in U.S. tax policy influence subsequent reforms in other polities; in the long term, all nations move toward the U.S. neoliberal tax structure. Analysis also shows, however, that the short-term responsiveness to U.S. tax reforms is notably greater where uncoordinated market institutions are dominant. Theory and extensive qualitative and quantitative evidence indicate that pressures to compete for mobile assets, as balanced against the economic and political costs of adoption, anchor the process of diffusion of neoliberal tax policy. There is little evidence for the view that systematic policy learning or social emulation drove tax policy diffusion.Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Center for European Studies and Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Center for International Studies, UCLA; and Yale University as well as the 2002 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. An earlier version was published as Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University, Working Paper #120. I thank Alex Hicks, Rob Franzese, Torben Iversen, Andy Martin, Cathie Jo Martin; participants in the Yale, UCLA, and Harvard conferences, especially Geoffrey Garrett, Helen Milner, Dennis Quinn, and Beth Simmons; and two anonymous referees and the editors of International Organization for helpful comments. I also gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Sven Steinmo that comes by way of our past collaborative work on tax policy.

Type
SYMPOSIUM: DIFFUSION OF LIBERALISM
Information
International Organization , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 847 - 882
Copyright
© 2006 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basinger, Scott, and Mark Hallerberg. 2004. Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom. American Political Science Review 98 (2):261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. Time-Series Cross-Section Data: What We Have Learned in the Past Few Years. Annual Review of Political Science 4:271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1996. Nuisance Versus Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series–Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Oliver, and Justin Wolfers. 1999. The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Bonturi, Marcos, and Kiichiro Fukasaku. 1993. Global and Intra-Firm Trade: An Empirical Note. OECD Economic Studies No. 20. Paris: OECD.
Boskin, Michael, and Charles McClure Jr., eds. 1990. World Tax Reform: Case Studies of Developed and Developing Countries. San Francisco: ICS Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Christopher Zorn. 2002. Duration Models for Repeated Events. Journal of Politics 64 (4):1069–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Eric, and John Dreijmanis, eds. 1982. Government Coalitions in Western Democracies. London: Longman.
Budge, Ian, H-D. Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Carey, David, and Josette Rabesona. 2002. Tax Ratios on Labour and Capital Income and on Consumption. OECD Economic Studies No. 35. Paris: OECD.
Castles, Francis. 1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-War Transformation. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
Castles, Francis G., ed. 1993. Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Brookfield, Vt.: Dartmouth.
Castles, Francis G., and Peter Mair. 1984. Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopers and Lybrand International Tax Network. Selected years. International Tax Summaries. New York: Wiley.
Cummins, Jason G., Kevin A. Hassett, and R. Glenn Hubbard. 1995. Tax Reforms and Investment: A Cross-Country Comparison. NBER Working Paper 5232. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
European Commission. 2004. Structures of the Taxation Systems in the European Union: Data 1995–2002. Luxembourg: Office of the Official Publications of the European Commission.
Friedrich, Robert. 1982. In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations. American Journal of Political Science 26 (4):797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganghof, Steffen. 2000. Adjusting National Tax Policy to Economic Internationalization: Strategies and Outcomes. In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, edited by Fritz Scharpf and Vivien Schmidt, 597–645. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ganghof, Steffen. 2004. Progressive Income Taxation in Advanced OECD Countries: Revisiting the Structural Dependence of the State on Capital. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Chicago.
Ganghof, Steffen, and Richard Eccleston. 2004. Globalization and the Dilemma of Income Taxation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (3):519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998a. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998b. Global Markets and National Policies: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle. International Organization 52 (4):787–824.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Deborah Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, Government Spending, and Taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39 (2):145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschel, Philipp. 1999. Tax Competition and the Welfare State. Typescript, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany.
Gordon, Roger H. 1992. Can Capital Income Taxation Survive in Open Economies? Journal of Finance 47 (3):1159–1180.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policy- making in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3):275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter, and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hallerberg, Mark, and Scott Basinger. 1998. Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies 31 (3):321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude. 2003. Globalization and Capital Taxation in Consensus and Majoritarian Democracies. World Politics 56 (1):79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Lane Kenworthy. 1998. Cooperation and Political Economic Performance in Affluent Democratic Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 103 (6):1631–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 1998. Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model: Crisis and Future Prospects. Comparative Political Studies 31 (3):353–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin, and John D. Stephens. 1993. Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):711–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1998. Balance of Trade Statistics, 1998. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Selected years. Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Selected years. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens, eds. 1999. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kvist, Jan F. 1995. On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1):53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahler, Vincent, and David Jesuit. 2004. State Redistribution in Comparative Perspective: A Cross-National Analysis of the Developed Democracies. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Chicago.
Martin, Cathie Jo. 1991. Shifting the Burden: The Struggle Over Growth and Corporate Taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mendoza, E. G., A. Razin, and L. L. Tesar. 1994. Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics: Cross-Country Estimates of Tax Rates in Factor Incomes and Consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34 (3):297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1987. Taxation in Developed Countries. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1994. The Jobs Study. Vol. I and II. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. International Direct Investment Statistics Yearbook. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. Labor Force Statistics. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. National Accounts of OECD Member Countries. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. Revenue Statistics of Member Countries. Paris: OECD.
Pechman, Joseph A., ed. 1988. World Tax Reform: A Progress Report. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Political Handbook of the World. Selected years. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Quinn, Dennis. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review 91 (3):531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Slemrod, Joel. 1990. Tax Principles in an International Economy. In World Tax Reform: Case Studies of Developed and Developing Countries, edited by Michael Boskin and Charles McClure Jr., 11–24. San Francisco: ICS Press.
Slemrod, Joel. 2004. Are Corporate Tax Rates, or Countries, Converging? Journal of Public Economics 88 (6):1169–1186.Google Scholar
Soskice, David. 1999. Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens, 101–134. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Steinmo, Sven. 1993. Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Steinmo, Sven. 2002. A Political Economy of Economic Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Century. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Swank, Duane. 1992. Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations. American Political Science Review 86 (1):38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane. 1998. Funding the Welfare State: Globalization and the Taxation of Business in Advanced Market Economies. Political Studies 46 (4):671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swank, Duane. 2003. Withering Welfare? Globalisation, Political Economic Institutions, and Contemporary Welfare States. In States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, edited by Linda Weiss, 58–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swank, Duane, and Sven Steinmo. 2002. The New Political Economy of Taxation in Advanced Capitalist Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):642–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 1987. The Response of Other Industrial Countries to the U.S. Tax Reform Act. National Tax Journal 40 (3):339–355.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Why German Employers Cannot Bring Themselves to Dismantle the German Model. In Unions, Employers, and Central Banks, edited by Torben Iversen, Jonas Pontusson, and Davod Soskice, 138–172. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Visser, Jelle. 1992 and 1996. Trade Union Membership Database. Unionization Trends Revisited. Typescripts, Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.