Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T12:06:27.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Securitization, Social Identity, and Democratic Security: Nixon, India, and the Ties That Bind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2012

Jarrod Hayes
Jarrod Hayes
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Democratic Peace stands as one of the most coherent and recognizable programs of study in international relations. Yet despite the pages of research devoted to the subject and claims about its law-like nature, the democratic peace remains a highly contested finding. In large part, this contestation arises out of an enduring question: What exactly keeps democracies from fighting? Drawing on the securitization theory of the Copenhagen School as well as social psychology, this article claims that a critical mechanism of the democratic peace lies at the political junction between policymakers and the public. I argue that the democratic identity of the public, grounded in basic democratic norms essential for the function of any democracy at any time, plays an independent role in the construction of security and foreign policy in the United States. To test the argument, I examine the difficult case of the 1971 Bangladesh War, when President Richard Nixon sent the USS Enterprise carrier group to the Bay of Bengal. Analysis of public statements as well as administration documentation reveals that, while Nixon and national security advisor Henry Kissinger actively saw India as a threat to U.S. interests, they were constrained by their belief that the public would not accept a security argument with respect to a fellow democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 63 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, Dominic, Wetherell, Margaret, Cochrane, Sandra, Hogg, Michael A., and Turner, John C.. 1990. Knowing What to Think by Knowing Who You Are: Self-Categorization and the Nature of Norm Formation, Conformity and Group Polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2):97–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed.London: Verso.Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations 11 (2):171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, Archer K. 1971. Selective Genocide. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d125.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues 55 (3):429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Rupert. 2000. Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (6):745–78.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review 93 (4):791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, George W. 2003. President Bush Discusses Freedom in Iraq and Middle East, Washington, D.C., 6 November 2003. Available at ⟨http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/11/20031106-2.html⟩. Accessed 27 June 2011.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cameron, James E. 2004. A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity. Self and Identity 3 (3):239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Steve. 1984. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall … Are the Freer Countries More Pacific? Journal of Conflict Resolution 28 (4):617–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauswitz, Carl von. 1976 [1832]. On War, edited and translated by Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, William J. 1994. State of the Union Address. Washington, D.C., 25 January 1994. Available at ⟨http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/states/docs/sou94.htm⟩. Accessed 27 June 2011.Google Scholar
Crocker, Jennifer, and Luhtanen, Riia. 1990. Collective Self-Esteem and Ingroup Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1):60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilovic, Vesna, and Clare, Joe. 2007. The Kantian Liberal Peace (Revisited). American Journal of Political Science 51 (2):397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, William J., and Senese, Paul D.. 2002. Democracy, Disputes, and Negotiated Settlements. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (4):547–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
diZerega, Gus. 1995. Democracies and Peace: The Self-Organizing Foundation for the Democratic Peace. Review of Politics 57 (2):279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80 (4):1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Colin. 1996. Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy? Security Studies 6 (1):7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power : Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farnham, Barbara. 2003. The Theory of Democratic Peace and Threat Perception. International Studies Quarterly 47 (3):395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Gregory, and Farrell, Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the ‘Construction’ of Security in Post–Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3):505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1971a. Gallup Poll; December 10–13: Do You Approve or Disapprove of the Way Nixon Is Handling His Job as President? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1971b. Gallup Poll; July 15–18: Do You Approve or Disapprove of the Way Nixon Is Handling His Job as President? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1971c. Gallup Poll; May 14–17: Do You Approve or Disapprove of the Way Nixon Is Handling His Job as President? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1971d. Gallup Poll; October 8–11: Do You Approve or Disapprove of the Way Nixon Is Handling His Job as President? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1971e. Gallup Poll; April 2–5, 1971: In the Event India Is Attacked by Communist Backed Forces, Tell Me What Action You Would Want to See Us Take? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart. 2004. The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2):133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays. 2005. Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a ‘China Threat’ Inevitable? European Journal of International Relations 11 (2):235–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mark L. 2005. The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789–1989. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2000. The Little Mermaid's Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (2):285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Ewan. 2004. State Socialization, International Norm Dynamics and the Liberal Peace. International Politics 41 (4):521–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Jarrod. 2009. Identity and Securitization in the Democratic Peace: The United States and the Divergence of Response to India and Iran's Nuclear Programs. International Studies Quarterly 53 (4):977–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Margaret G., and Kegley, Charles W. Jr. 1995. Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology. International Studies Quarterly 39 (4):511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2000. Subjective Uncertainty Reduction Through Self-Categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes. European Review of Social Psychology 11 (1):223–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2001. A Social Identity Theory of Leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (3):184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2003. Social Categorization, Depersonalization, and Group Behavior. In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, edited by Hogg, Michael A. and Tindale, R. Scott, 56–85. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2006. Social Identity Theory. In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by Burke, Peter J., 111–36. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., Abrams, Dominic, Otten, Sabine, and Hinkle, Steve. 2004. The Social Identity Perspective: Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups. Small Group Research 35 (3):246–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huysmans, Jef. 1998. Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe. European Journal of International Relations 4 (4):479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymans, Jacques E.C. 2002. Applying Social Identity Theory to the Study of International Politics: A Caution and an Agenda. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, March, New Orleans, La.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Martin, Lisa L.. 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 20 (1):39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kux, Dennis. 1994. Estranged Democracies: India and the United States, 1941–1991. New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates. 1971a. Harris Survey, February: How Would You Rate President Nixon on … Working for Peace in the World … Excellent, Pretty Good, Only Fair, or Poor? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates. 1971b. Harris Survey, March: How Would You Rate President Nixon on … Working for Peace in the World … Excellent, Pretty Good, Only Fair, or Poor? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates. 1971c. Harris Survey, September: How Would You Rate President Nixon on … Working for Peace in the World … Excellent, Pretty Good, Only Fair, or Poor? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates. 1972a. Harris Survey, 28 December—4 January 1972: How Would You Rate President Nixon on His Handling of the War Between India and Pakistan … Excellent, Pretty Good, Only Fair, or Poor? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates. 1972b. Harris Survey, 28 December 1971—4 January 1972: In the Recent War Between India and Pakistan, Did You Feel More in Sympathy with India or with Pakistan? The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce M.. 1993. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review 87 (3):624–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Matt. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4):563–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarty, Craig. 1999. Categorization in Social Psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49 (2):229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Harald, and Wolff, Jonas. 2004. Dyadic Democratic Peace Strikes Back: Reconstructing the Social Constructivist Approach After the Monadic Renaissance. Paper presented at the 5th Pan-European International Relations Conference, September, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M. 1971a. The President's News Conference of August 4, 1971. In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Richard Nixon, 1971, 849–50. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M. 1971b. Remarks of Welcome to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India, 4 November 1971. In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Richard Nixon, 1971, 1079–80. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M. 1971c. Statement About Additional Funds for Humanitarian Relief and Refugee Rehabilitation in South Asia, 1 October 1971. In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Richard Nixon, 1971, 1017–18. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Oakes, Penelope. 1996. The Categorization Process: Cognition and the Group in the Social Psychology of Stereotyping. In Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel, edited by Robinson, W. Peter, 95–119. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2007. Remarks of Senator Obama: The War We Need to Win, Washington, D.C., 1 August 2007. Available at ⟨http://www.wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/obamasp0807.pdf⟩. Accessed July 9, 2011.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R., Russett, Bruce M., and Berbaum, Michael L.. 2003. Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992. International Studies Quarterly 47 (3):371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, John M. 1994. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19 (2):87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, John M. 1997. Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peceny, Mark. 1997. A Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Peace: The Ambiguous Case of the Spanish-American War. Journal of Peace Research 34 (4):415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Scott A., and Hogg, Michael A.. 2005. Uncertainty Reduction, Self-Enhancement, and Ingroup Identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (6):804–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Representative Gallagher (D-N.J.). 1971. The Situation on the Indian Subcontinent. Congressional Record, 92nd Cong., 1st sess., 45545. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Democratic Peace–Warlike Democracies?: A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument. European Journal of International Relations 1 (4):491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, David L., Gelpi, Christopher, Reiter, Dan, and Huth, Paul K.. 1996. Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918–88. American Political Science Review 90 (3):512–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1979. Understanding Conflict and War. Vol. 4, War, Power, Peace. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post–Cold War World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sathasivam, Kanishkan. 2005. Uneasy Neighbors: India, Pakistan and U.S. Foreign Policy. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Schafer, Mark, and Walker, Stephen G.. 2006. Democratic Leaders and the Democratic Peace: The Operational Codes of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3):561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization 53 (2):233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senator Church (D-Idaho). 1971. War between India and Pakistan and the Ineptitude of U.S. Policy. Congressional Record, 92nd Cong., 1st sess., 44849–50. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Senator Harris (D-Okla.). 1971. A New Low in American Diplomacy. Congressional Record, 92nd Cong., 1st sess., 44834–35. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Senator Kennedy (D-Mass.). 1971. U.S. Policy Toward the Crisis in South Asia. Congressional Record, 92nd Cong., 1st sess., 45124–26: Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sisson, Richard, and Rose, Leo E.. 1990. War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1976. The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816–1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1 (1):50–69.Google Scholar
Stritzel, Holger. 2007. Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond. European Journal of International Relations 13 (3):357–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison. In Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Tajfel, Henri, 61–76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., and Flament, Claude. 1971. Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2):149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen, 33–47. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Taureck, Rita. 2006. Securitization Theory and Securitization Studies. Journal of International Relations and Development 9 (1):53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope J., Reicher, Stephen D., and Wetherell, Margaret S.. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2010. United States 1971 Total Commodity Trade SITC as Reported (Import, Export). Available at ⟨http://comtrade.un.org⟩. Accessed 2 August 2011.Google Scholar
United States Central Intelligence Agency. 1971. SNIE 32-71: Prospects for Pakistan. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d131.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1969a. Admiral Ahsan's Call on the Under Secretary. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d15.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1969b. Secretary's Lahore Meeting with President Yahya. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d23.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1969c. Memorandum of Conversation, New Delhi, 1 August 1969. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d30⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971a. Conversation Among President Nixon, the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), and Attorney General Mitchell, Washington, 8 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d165⟩. Accessed 2 August 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971b. Conversation Among President Nixon, the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), and the Pakistani Foreign Secretary (Sultan Khan), 15 November 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d154⟩. Accessed 2 August 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971c. Conversation Among President Nixon, the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), and the President's Chief of Staff (Haldeman), Washington, 5 November 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d150⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971d. Conversation Among President Nixon, the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), and the President's Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs (Haig), Washington, 12 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d177⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971e. Conversation Among President Nixon, the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), the British Foreign Secretary (Douglas-Home), and the British Ambassador (Cromer), Washington, 30 September 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d146⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971f. Conversation Between President Nixon and His Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 9 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d168⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971g. Conversation Between President Nixon and His Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 10 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d172⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971h. Conversation Between President Nixon and His Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 4 June 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d136⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971i. Conversation Between President Nixon and His Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 26 May 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d135⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971j. Minutes of Senior Review Group Meeting. San Clemente, 31 March 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. XI, South Asia Crisis, 1971, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v11/d17⟩. Accessed July 29, 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971k. Minutes of Washington Special Actions Group Meeting. Washington, 3 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. XI, South Asia Crisis, 1971, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v11/d218⟩. Accessed 29 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971l. Pakistan-American Relations. A Reassessment. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d132.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971m. Transcript of Telephone Conversation Between President Nixon and His Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), San Clemente, 29 March 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. XI, South Asia Crisis, 1971, edited by Smith, Louis J., 35–36. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971n. Transcript of Telephone Conversation between Secretary of State Rogers and the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 23 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d195.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971o. Transcript of Telephone Conversation Between Secretary of State Rogers and the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 23 November 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d155.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971p. Transcript of Telephone Conversation Between Secretary of the Treasury Connally and the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), Washington, 5 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d159.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971q. Transcript of Telephone Conversation Between the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) and the Pakistani Ambassador (Raza), Washington, 8 December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1969-76ve07/pdf/d164.pdf⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1971r. India and Pakistan: Crisis and War, March-December 1971. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J., Docs. 122–197. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/ch2⟩. Accessed 27 July 2011.Google Scholar
United States Office of the President. 1970. Memorandum of Conversation: Meeting between President and Pakistan President Yahya, Washington, 25 October 1970. In Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976. Vol. E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969–1972, edited by Smith, Louis J.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve07/d90⟩. Accessed 2 August 2011.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W. 2005. The Democratic Peace Is What States Make of It: A Constructivist Analysis of the U.S.-Indian ‘Near-Miss’ in the 1971 South Asian Crisis. European Journal of International Relations 11 (3):431–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2001. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations 7 (4):525–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47 (4):511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar