Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Philpott, Daniel
2000.
The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations.
World Politics,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 2,
p.
206.
Avant, Deborah
2000.
From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War.
International Organization,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Risse, Thomas
2000.
“Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics.
International Organization,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Crawford, Neta C.
2000.
The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships.
International Security,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
116.
Krauss, Ellis S.
2000.
Japan, the US, and the emergence of multilateralism in Asia.
The Pacific Review,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 3,
p.
473.
Feaver, Peter D.
Hellmann, Gunther
Schweller, Randall L.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.
Wohlforth, William C.
Legro, Jeffrey W.
and
Moravcsik, Andrew
2000.
Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anybody Ever a Realist?).
International Security,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Schweller, Randall L.
and
Wohlforth, William C.
2000.
Power test: Evaluating realism in response to the end of the cold war.
Security Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
60.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.
2001.
Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited.
International Security,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
128.
Cetinyan, Rupen
2002.
Ethnic Bargaining in the Shadow of Third-Party Intervention.
International Organization,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
645.
SENDING, OLE JACOB
2002.
Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the `Logic of Appropriateness' and its Use in Constructivist Theory.
European Journal of International Relations,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
443.
PETROVA, MARGARITA H.
2003.
The End of the Cold War: a Battle or Bridging Ground Between Rationalist and Ideational Approaches in International Relations?.
European Journal of International Relations,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
115.
Lewis, Jeffrey
2003.
Institutional Environments And Everyday EU Decision Making.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
97.
Barkin, J.Samuel
2003.
Realist Constructivism.
International Studies Review,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
325.
Guzzini, Stefano
2004.
The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations.
European Journal of International Relations,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
533.
Mercer, Jonathan
2005.
PROSPECT THEORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Hui, Victoria Tin-bor
2005.
War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe.
LAWSON, GEORGE
2006.
The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations.
International Studies Review,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
397.
Mabee, Bryan
2007.
Levels and Agents, States and People: Micro-Historical Sociological Analysis and International Relations.
International Politics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 4,
p.
431.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.
Lobell, Steven E.
and
Ripsman, Norrin M.
2009.
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy.
p.
1.
Albaugh, Ericka A.
2009.
The Colonial Image Reversed: Language Preferences and Policy Outcomes in African Education.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
389.