Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:12:50.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Robert Gilpin
Get access

Extract

These two statements—the first by a Canadian nationalist, the second by a former United States undersecretary of state—express a dominant theme of contemporary wrïtings on international relations. International society, we are told, is increasingly rent between its economic and its political organization. On the one hand, powerful economic and technical forces are creating a highly integrated transnational economy, blurring the traditional significance of national boundaries. On the other hand, the nationstate continues to command men's loyalties and to be the basic unit of political decision. As one writer has put the issue, “The conflict of our era is between ethnocentric nationalism and geocentric technology.”

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Summer 1971 , pp. 398 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rolfe, Sidney, “Updating Adam Smith,” Interplay, 11 1968 (Vol. 1, No. 4), p. 15Google Scholar.

2 An analysis of the argument is provided bySilberner, Edmund, The Problem of War in Nineteenth Century Economic Thought, trans. Krappe, Alexander H. (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1946)Google Scholar.

3 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, Edwin (New York: Modern Library, 1937)Google Scholar.

4 The relevant sections appear inWangermann, Ernst, ed., The Role of Force in History: A Study of Bismarck's Policy of Blood and Iron, trans. Cohen, Jack (New York: International Publishers, 1968)Google Scholar. The best exposition of Marxist theories of economic relations is Wiles, P. J. D., Communist International Economics (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1969)Google Scholar.

5 Wangermann, p. 13.

6 Ibid., p. 14.

7 The article appears inBhagwati, J. N., ed., Economics and World Order (New York: World Law Fund, 1970)Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 1.

9 Ibid., pp. 2–3.

10 Viner, Jacob, The Customs Union Issue (Studies in the Administration of International Law and Organization, No. 10) (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950)Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., pp. 98–99.

12 Ibid., p. 101.

13 Ibid., pp. 95–101.

14 Ibid., p. 105.

15 Staley, Eugene, World Economy in Transition: Technology vs. Politics, Laissez Fairs vs. Planning, Power vs. Welfare (Publications of the Council on Foreign Relations) (New York: Council on Foreign Relations [under the auspices of the American Coordinating Committee for International Studies], 1939), pp. 51–52Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., p. 52.

17 Perroux's, theory of the dominant economy is set forth in his “Esquisse d'une théorie de l'économie dominante,” Economic appliquée, 04–09 1948 (Vol. 1, Nos. 2–3), pp. 243–300Google Scholar.

18 Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Politics (2nd ed.; New York: St. Martin's Press, 1954), p. 117Google Scholar.

19 Imlah, Albert H., Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica: Studies in British Foreign Trade in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapter 1.

20 Hobson, J. A., Imperialism: A Study (3rd rev. ed.; London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1938), p. 57Google Scholar.

21 Condliffe, J. B., The Commerce of Nations (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1950), p. 502Google Scholar.

22 The basic source for this period isGardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: The Origins and Prospects of Our International Economic Order (expd. ed.; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1969)Google Scholar.

23 The most ambitious statement of this thesis isKolko, Gabriel, The Politics of War: The World and the United States Foreign Policy, 1943–1945 (New York: Random House, 1968)Google Scholar.

24 See the study by Gilbert, Felix, To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1961)Google Scholar.

25 For the history of these efforts see Patterson, Gardner, Discrimination in International Trade: The Policy Issues, 1945–1965 (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapter 6.

26 Frederick S. Dunn, in collaboration with Annemarie Shimoney, Corbett, Percy E., and Cohen, Bernard C., Peace-Making and the Settlement with Japan (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1963)Google Scholar, chapter 7.

27 For this history see Gilpin, Robert, France in the Age of the Scientific State (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press [for the Center of International Studies, Princeton University], 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapter 3.

28 United States, Congress, House, Amending the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 to Increase Military Pay; To Authorize Military Active Duty Strengths for Fiscal Year 1972; And for Other Purposes, H.R. 6531, 92nd Cong., 1st sess., 1971, Amendment No. 86Google Scholar.

29 Perlmutter, Howard V., “Some Management Problems in Spaceship Earth: The Megafirm and the Global Industrial Estate,” Academy of Management Proceedings, 29th Annual Meeting, Chicago, August 24–27, 1969, pp. 59–93Google Scholar.

30 Staley, Eugene, War and the Private Investor: A Study in the Relations of International Politics and International Private Investment (Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1935)Google Scholar.

31 Foreign Ownership and the Structure of Canadian Industry, Report of the Task Force on the Structure of Canadian Industry (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 01 1968)Google Scholar.