Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:45:00.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

Elizabeth N. Saunders
Get access

Abstract

Despite advances in the study of individuals in international relations, we still know little about how the traits and biases of individuals aggregate. Most foreign policy decisions are made in groups, usually by elites with varying degrees of experience, which can have both positive and negative psychological effects. This paper addresses the aggregation problem by exploring how the balance of foreign policy experience among leaders and advisers affects decision making in war, using a principal-agent framework that allows the relative experience of leaders and advisers to vary. A leader's experience affects decision making and, ultimately, the risks associated with conflict, through three mechanisms. First, experience influences a leader's ability to monitor advisers. Second, a leader's experience affects the credibility of delegation to experienced advisers and, in turn, the nature and extent of information gathering. Third, experience affects whether leaders are able to diversify advice, as well as their preference for policies that appear certain. I illustrate the argument using two cases that hold an unusual number of factors constant: the 1991 and 2003 Iraq Wars. George W. Bush's inexperience exacerbated the biases of his advisers, whereas his father's experience cast a long shadow over many of the same officials. Understanding the experience and biases of any one individual is insufficient—the balance of experience within a group is also important. Experience is therefore not fungible: a seasoned team cannot substitute for an experienced leader.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Supplement S1 , April 2017 , pp. S219 - S247
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Graham, and Zelikow, Philip. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cameron, and Galinsky, Adam D.. 2006. Power, Optimism, and Risk-Taking. European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (4):511–36.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review 53 (5):941–73.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Rick. 1993. Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D. 1994. Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Peter. 2013. Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen. 1995. Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices About Administrative Procedures. American Political Science Review 89 (1):62–73.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, and Hammond, Thomas H.. 1992. Rethinking Allison's Models. American Political Science Review 86 (2):301–22.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan B., Glazer, Amihai, and Hammond, Thomas H.. 2001. Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science 4:235–69.Google Scholar
Bensahel, Nora. 2006. Mission Not Accomplished: What Went Wrong with Iraqi Reconstruction. Journal of Strategic Studies 29 (3):453–73.Google Scholar
Bush, George, and Scowcroft, Brent. 1998. A World Transformed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Callander, Steven. 2008. A Theory of Policy Expertise. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (2): 123–40.Google Scholar
Chase, William G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1973. Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1): 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D. 2013. Domestic Revolutionary Leaders and International Conflict. World Politics 65 (4):656–90.Google Scholar
Dessein, Wouter. 2002. Authority and Communication in Organizations. Review of Economic Studies 69 (4): 811–38.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1994. Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2):362–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Stephen Benedict. 2009. “Stuff Happens”: Donald Rumsfeld and the Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (4):327–47.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen Benedict. 2010/2011. George W. Bush, the Surge, and Presidential Leadership. Political Science Quarterly 125 (4):557–85.Google Scholar
Dyson, Stephen Benedict. 2013. What Really Happened in Planning for Postwar Iraq? Political Science Quarterly 128 (3):455–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallows, James. 2004. Blind into Baghdad. Atlantic Monthly January.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, and Kosfeld, Michael. 2006. The Hidden Costs of Control. American Economic Review 96 (5):1611–30.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D. 2003. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D. 2011. The Right to Be Right: Civil-Military Relations and the Iraq Surge Decision. International Security 35 (4):87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 2015. Watchdogs on the Hill: The Decline of Congressional Oversight of US Foreign Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1993. Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort? The Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty. Economic Inquiry 31 (4):663–70.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 2005. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2012. Formal Models of Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Political Science 15:353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2013. Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander. 1980. Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2):287–335.Google Scholar
Glad, Betty. 2009. An Outsider in the White House: Jimmy Carter, His Advisors, and the Making of Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Robert, and Michelene, T.H. Chi. 1988. Overview. In The Nature of Expertise, edited by Chi, Michelene T.H., Glaser, Robert, and Farr, Marshall J., xv–xxviii. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goel, Anand M., and Thakor, Anjan V.. 2008. Overconfidence, CEO Selection, and Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 63 (6):2737–84.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Doris Kearns. 2006. Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, Bernard E.. 1995. The Generals’ War. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, Bernard E.. 2006. Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Haass, Richard N. 2009. War of Necessity, War of Choice: A Memoir of Two Iraq Wars. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hughes, D. Alex, and Victor, David G.. 2013. The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics 11 (2):368–86.Google Scholar
Halevy, Yoram. 2007. Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study. Econometrica 75 (2):503–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K. 2017. How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S61–S84.Google Scholar
Hermann, Margaret G., and Hermann, Charles F.. 1989. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly 33 (4):361–87.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Alexander V., and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2012. Policy-Specific Information and Informal Agenda Power. American Journal of Political Science 56 (1):67–83.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., Stam, Allan C., and Ellis, Cali M.. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houghton, David Patrick. 2008. Invading and Occupying Iraq: Some Insights from Political Psychology. Peace and Conflict 14 (2):169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2003. The Confrontation Between Iraq and the US: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Deterrence. European Journal of International Relations 9 (2):315–37.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2008/2009. War, Intelligence, and Honesty: A Review Essay. Political Science Quarterly 123 (4):645–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P. 2004. Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P., and Fowler, James H.. 2011. The Evolution of Overconfidence. Nature 477:317–20.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Boushey, Graeme, and Workman, Samuel. 2006. Behavioral Rationality and the Policy Processes: Toward a New Model of Organizational Information Processing. In Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin and Goodin, Robert E., 49–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Renshon, Jonathan D.. 2009. Hawkish Biases. In American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat Inflation since 9/11, edited by Thrall, Trevor and Cramer, Jane, 79–96. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017. Resolve, Time, and Risk. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S109–S136.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, Susan L., and Davis, Mark A.. 1998. A Study of Escalating Commitment in Principal-Agent Relationships: Effects of Monitoring and Personal Responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (2):206–17.Google Scholar
Krishna, Vijay, and Morgan, John. 2001. A Model of Expertise. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2):747–75.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2010/2011. Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory: Assessing Rationalist Explanations of the Iraq War. International Security 35 (3):7–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (3):255–75.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1997. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):87–112.Google Scholar
Mann, James. 2004. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, Robert J. 2013. Congressional Oversight Hearings and Policy Control. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (3):349–76.Google Scholar
Meacham, Jon. 2015. Destiny and Power: The American Odyssey of George Herbert Walker Bush. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Stone, E., Atanasov, P., Rohrbaugh, N., Metz, S.E., Ungar, L., Bishop, M.M., Horowitz, M., Merkle, E., and Tetlock, P.. 2015. The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis: Drivers of Prediction Accuracy in World Politics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
Myers, David G., and Lamm, Helmut. 1976. The Group Polarization Phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin 83 (4):602–27.Google Scholar
Packer, George. 2005. The Assassins’ Gate: America in Iraq. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2011. Diversity and Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pitesa, Marko, and Thau, Stefan. 2013. Masters of the Universe: How Power and Accountability Influence Self-Serving Decisions Under Moral Hazard. Journal of Applied Psychology 98 (3):550–58.Google Scholar
Preston, Thomas. 2001. The President and His Inner Circle: Leadership Style and the Advisory Process in Foreign Affairs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S33–S59.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan D. 2015. Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders. International Organizatin 69 (3):659–95.Google Scholar
Renshon, Stanley A. 1993. Good Judgment, and the Lack Thereof, During the Gulf War: A Preliminary Psychological Model with Some Applications. In The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Process of Conflict, edited by Renshon, Stanley A., 67–105. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rho, Sungmin, and Tomz, Michael. 2017. Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S85–S108.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter. 2005. War and Human Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. The Law of Group Polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–95.Google Scholar
t'Hart, Paul, Stern, Eric K., and Sundelius, Bengt. 1997. Foreign Policy-making at the Top: Political Group Dynamics. In Beyond Groupthink: Political Group Dynamics and Foreign Policy-making, edited by t'Hart, Paul, Stern, Eric K., and Sundelius, Bengt, 3–34. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Lerner, Jennifer S.. 1999. The Social Contingency Model: Identifying Empirical and Normative Boundary Conditions on the Error-and-Bias Portrait of Human Nature. In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, edited by Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y., 571–85. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Traub, James. 2001. The Bush Years: W.’s World. New York Times Magazine, 14 January.Google Scholar
Vertzberger, Yaacov Y.I. 1998. Risk Taking and Decisionmaking: Foreign Military Intervention Decisions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, James F., and Post, Timothy A.. 1988. On the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems. In The Nature of Expertise, edited by Chi, Michelene T.H., Glaser, Robert, and Farr, Marshall J., 261–85. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wayne, Stephen J. 1993. President Bush Goes to War: A Psychological Interpretation from a Distance. In The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Process of Conflict, edited by Renshon, Stanley A., 29–48. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 1991. The Commanders: The Pentagon and the First Gulf War, 1989–1991. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 2004. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Yetiv, Steve A. 2011. Explaining Foreign Policy: US Decision-Making in the Gulf Wars. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, David H. 2013. Group Polarization on Corporate Boards: Theory and Evidence on Board Decisions About Acquisition Premiums. Strategic Management Journal 34 (7):800–22.Google Scholar