Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:54:39.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legitimacy and Institutional Replacement: The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Emergence of the Mine Ban Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

M. Patrick Cottrell
M. Patrick Cottrell
Affiliation:
Linfield College, McMinnville, Oregon, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

When and under what conditions is an existing international institution most likely to be replaced by a new one? Conventional international relations theories offer only partial insights into this question and seldom address it directly. But replacement occurs in a variety of important international contexts. For example, the United Nations replaced the League of Nations, the WTO replaced the GATT, and most recently, the Ottawa Convention banning landmines replaced Protocol II of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW). I argue that the concept of legitimacy, commonly defined as “the belief that an institution ought to be obeyed,” and careful attention to the development of the existing institution are necessary to understand replacement. After developing a theoretical framework to conceptualize the relationship between legitimacy and replacement, this article traces the origins and development of the largely overlooked institutional predecessor to the Ottawa Convention: the CCW. It then shows how ideational change, driven by transnational efforts to delegitimate the CCW, paved the way for a shift in discourse from control to disarmament that made the creation of a new institution possible. The article concludes by seeking to generalize from the CCW experience through a preliminary discussion of other ways and cases in which legitimacy might affect institutional replacement and persistence.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 217 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Emanuel. 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post–Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2):195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth. 2000. The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society. European Journal of International Law 11 (1):91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Heights, N.J.: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 1998. To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coicaud, Jean-Marc, and Heiskanen, Veijo. 2001. The Legitimacy of International Organizations. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croll, Mike. 1998. The History of Landmines. Barnsley, England: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
Dolan, Michael, and Hunt, Chris. 1998. Negotiating in the Ottawa Process: The New Multilateralism. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 392–424. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 55 (3):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada. 2008. “Ottawa Convention Links and Documents.” Updated 18 July 2008. Available at ⟨http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/mines/documents/⟩. Accessed 10 October 2008.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, Robert G. Jr. 1998. The Military Utility of Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 136–60. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1):1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Translated McCarthy, by Thomas. Boston, Mass.: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated McCarthy, by Thomas. Boston, Mass.: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch (HRW). 1993. Landmines: A Deadly Legacy. New York: HRW.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2005. Power, Institutions, and the Production of Inequality. In Power and Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, 33–59. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1992. A Perverse Use of Technology: Mines. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1994. Landmines, Time for Action: International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1996. Anti-Personnel Landmines: Friend or Foe? A Study of the Military Use and Effectiveness of Anti-Personnel Mines. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. The Culture of National Security. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4):379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2d ed.New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kittrie, Nicholas N. 2000. Rebels with a Cause: The Minds and Morality of Political Offenders. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 106 (8):2599–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4):753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Robert J., Gwozdecky, Mark, Sinclair, Jill, and Lysyshyn, Ralph. 1998. The Ottawa Process and the International Movement to Ban Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 160–85. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maresca, Louis, Maslen, Stuart, and ICRC., the 2000. The Banning of Anti-Personnel Landmines: The Legal Contribution of the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1955–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslen, Stuart. 1998. The Role of the International Committee of the Red Cross. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 80–99. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, Robert J. 2001. The 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons: A Useful Framework Despite Earlier Disappointments. International Review of the Red Cross 83 (844):991–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. International Security 15 (1):5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994–1995. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4):479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottawa Convention (Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction). Available at ⟨http://www.icbl.org/treaty/text/english⟩. Accessed 7 January 2009.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. 1996. The League of Nations and the Foreshadowing of the International Monetary Fund. Essays in International Finance, No. 201. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. 2007. The United Nations in a Changing Global Economy. In Global Liberalism and Political Order: Toward a New Grand Compromise? edited by Bernstein, Steven F. and Pauly, Louis W., 91–109. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2007. International Crises of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2/3):157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2002. Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversations Across Paradigms. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 597–623. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2):379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, and Maley, William. 1999. The Ottawa Convention on Landmines: A Landmark Humanitarian Treaty in Arms Control? Global Governance 5 (3):273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 208–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, Alex. 1998. The Crisis of Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 118–36. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste A. 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jody, and Goose, Stephen. 1998. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 20–48. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wurst, Jim. 1996. Landmines: Bobbled Ban. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Internet ed. Available at ⟨http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/campaign/landmine/1996/0804scientist.htm⟩. Accessed 7 January 2009.Google Scholar