Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:00:39.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2016

Jordan Branch
Get access

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are being applied with increasing frequency, and with increasing sophistication, in international relations and in political science more generally. Their benefits have been impressive: analyses that simply would not have been possible without GIS are now being completed, and the spatial component of international politics—long considered central but rarely incorporated analytically—has been given new emphasis. However, new methods face new challenges, and to apply GIS successfully, two specific issues need to be addressed: measurement validity and selection bias. Both relate to the challenge of conceptualizing nonspatial phenomena with the spatial tools of GIS. Significant measurement error can occur when the concepts that are coded as spatial variables are not, in fact, validly measured by the default data structure of GIS, and selection bias can arise when GIS systematically excludes certain types of units. Because these potential problems are hidden by the technical details of the method, GIS data sets and analyses can sometimes appear to overcome these challenges when, in fact, they fail to do so. Once these issues come to light, however, potential solutions become apparent—including some in existing applications in international relations and in other fields.

Type
Review Essay
Information
International Organization , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , Fall 2016 , pp. 845 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Scott F. 2013. The Economic Origins of the Territorial State. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Abramson, Scott F., and Carter, David B.. Forthcoming. The Historical Origins of Territorial Claims. American Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95 (3):529–46.Google Scholar
Agnew, John. 1994. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1):53–80.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2014. On Being Convinced: An Emotional Epistemology of International Relations. International Theory 6 (3):589–94.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 1997. Maps and History: Constructing Images of the Past. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa, and Chaney, Eric. 2013. The Feudal Revolution and Europe's Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World Before 1500 CE. American Political Science Review 107 (1):16–34.Google Scholar
Bol, Peter K. 2013. On the Cyberinfrastructure for GIS-Enabled Historiography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5):1087–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics. Political Analysis 11 (3):209–33.Google Scholar
Cammett, Melani, and Issar, Sukriti. 2010. Bricks and Mortar Clientelism: Sectarianism and the Logics of Welfare Allocation in Lebanon. World Politics 62 (3):381–421.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Buhaug, Halvard, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2009. Ethno-Nationalist Dyads and Civil War: A GIS-Based Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):496–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Buhaug, Halvard. 2013. Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Gimpel, James G.. 2012. Geographic Information Systems and the Spatial Dimensions of American Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15:443–60.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahoney, James. 1996. Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias and Qualitative Research. World Politics 49 (1):56–91.Google Scholar
Crampton, Jeremy W. 2004. GIS and Geographic Governance: Reconstructing the Choropleth Map. Cartographica 39 (1):41–53.Google Scholar
Crampton, Jeremy W. 2010. Mapping: A Critical Introduction to Cartography and GIS. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Erik J., Hammond, Jesse R., and Scott, John T.. 2013. Capitol Mobility: Madisonian Representation and the Location and Relocation of Capitals in the United States. American Political Science Review 107 (2):225–40.Google Scholar
Flint, Colin, Diehl, Paul, Scheffran, Juergen, Vasquez, John, and Chi, Sang-Hyun. 2009. Conceptualizing Conflict Space: Toward a Geography of Relational Power and Embeddedness in the Analysis of Interstate Conflict. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99 (5):827–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 2 (1):131–50.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Weidmann, Nils B.. 2012. Richardson in the Information Age: Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data in International Studies. Annual Review of Political Science 15:461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein E., and Schultz, Kenneth A.. 2015. The Politics of Territorial Disputes: A Geospatial Approach Applied to Africa. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Goodchild, Michael F. 2006. GIScience Ten Years After Ground Truth . Transactions in GIS 10 (5):687–92.Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian N. 2005. A Place in History: A Guide to Using GIS in Historical Research. 2nd ed. Belfast, Ireland: Centre for Data Digitisation and Analysis, Queens University.Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian N., and Ell, Paul S.. 2007. Historical GIS: Techniques, Methodologies and Scholarship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 373–406. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, J.B., and Woodward, David, eds. 1987. The History of Cartography. Vol. 1 Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knowles, Anne Kelly. 2000. Introduction. Social Science History 24 (3):451–70.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System. World Politics 39 (1):27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Martin W., and Wigen, Kären. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Logan, John R. 2012. Making a Place for Space: Spatial Thinking in Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 38:507–24.Google Scholar
Logan, John R., Zhang, Weiwei, and Xu, Hongwei. 2010. Applying Spatial Thinking in Social Science Research. GeoJournal 75 (1):15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lustick, Ian S. 1996. History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias. American Political Science Review 90 (3):605–18.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 28 (4):387–424.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nussli, Christos. 2010. Euratlas. Digital Historical Cartography of Europe. Available at <http://euratlas.com>. Accessed 27 March 2016..+Accessed+27+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, John, ed. 1995. Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pierskalla, Jan H., and Hollenbach, Florian M.. 2013. Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Cell Phone Coverage on Political Violence in Africa. American Political Science Review 107 (2):207–24.Google Scholar
Radil, Steven M., and Flint, Colin. 2013. Exiles and Arms: The Territorial Practices of State Making and War Diffusion in Post–Cold War Africa. Territory, Politics, Governance 1 (2):183–202.Google Scholar
Radil, Steven M., Flint, Colin, and Tita, George E.. 2010. Spatializing Social Networks: Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Geographies of Gang Rivalry, Territoriality, and Violence in Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (2):307–26.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Clionadh, Linke, Andrew, Hegre, Håvard, and Karlsen, Joakim. 2010. Introducing ACLED: Armed Conflict Location and Event Data. Journal of Peace Research 47 (5):651–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revel, Jacques. 1991. Knowledge of the Territory. Science in Context 4 (1):133–61.Google Scholar
Roth, Robin. 2009. The Challenges of Mapping Complex Indigenous Spatiality: From Abstract Space to Dwelling Space. Cultural Geographies 16 (2):207–27.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1):139–74.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Spielman, Seth E., and Logan, John R.. 2013. Using High-Resolution Population Data to Identify Neighborhoods and Establish Their Boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (1):67–84.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1978. “Opportunity” and “Willingness” as Ordering Concepts in the Study of War. International Interactions 4 (4):363–87.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2000. Using Geographic Information Systems to Revisit Enduring Rivalries: The Case of Israel. Geopolitics 5 (1):37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2002. Opportunity, Willingness, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Reconceptualizing Borders in International Relations. Political Geography 21 (2):243–61.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2003. The Power of Place and the Future of Spatial Analysis in the Study of Conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 20 (1):1–20.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2005. Territory, Proximity, and Spatiality: The Geography of International Conflict. International Studies Review 7 (3):387–406.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2013a. On Geopolitics: Space, Place, and International Relations. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2013b. On Geopolitics: Spaces and Places. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3):433–39.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Thomas, G. Dale. 2002. The “Nature” of Contiguous Borders: Ease of Interaction, Salience, and the Analysis of Crisis. International Interactions 28 (3):213–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Thomas, G. Dale. 2005. The Nature of Borders and International Conflict: Revisiting Hypotheses on Territory. International Studies Quarterly 49 (1):123–39.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2010. When Distance Mattered: Geographic Scale and the Development of European Representative Assemblies. American Political Science Review 104 (4):625–43.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2011. States of Credit: Size, Power, and the Development of European Polities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sundberg, Ralph, Eck, Kristine, and Kreutz, Joakim. 2012. Introducing the UCDP Non-State Conflict Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 49 (2):351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodoridis, Alexander G., and Nelson, Amy J.. 2012. Of BOLD Claims and Excessive Fears: A Call for Caution and Patience Regarding Political Neuroscience. Political Psychology 33 (1):41–57.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Andreas Forø, and Buhaug, Halvard. 2015. Insurgency and Inaccessibility. International Studies Review 17 (1):1–20.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Andreas Forø, Strand, Håvard, and Buhaug, Halvard. 2012. PRIO-GRID: A Unified Spatial Data Structure. Journal of Peace Research 49 (2):363–74.Google Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., Kuse, Doreen, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2010. The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset. International Interactions 36 (1):86–106.Google Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., Rød, Jan Ketil, and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2010. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):491–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, and Min, Brian. 2006. From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816–2001. American Sociological Review 71 (6):867–97.Google Scholar
Wood, Denis. 2010. Rethinking the Power of Maps. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Weidmann, Nils B., Girardin, Luc, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wimmer, Andreas. 2011. Politically Relevant Ethnic Groups Across Space and Time: Introducing the GeoEPR Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28 (5):423–37.Google Scholar