Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:46:12.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2011

Bridget Coggins
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

State emergence is an essential dynamic of the international system, yet international relations scholars pay it little attention. Their oversight is all the more unfortunate because international politics ultimately determine which aspiring system members will succeed in becoming new states. Existing models of state emergence rely exclusively on internal or domestic-level explanations. However, the international system is inherently social; therefore any aspiring state's membership also depends on the acceptance of its peers. I present a novel, international-level model of state birth that suggests state leaders should use decisions regarding new members strategically to advance their own interests, not passively abide by domestic factors. I test this argument using a new data set on secessionism and Great Power recognition (1931–2000). I find that external politics have important, underappreciated effects on state emergence. Furthermore, acknowledging the politics of recognition's centrality to state birth alters our understanding of civil conflict dynamics and conflict resolution and suggests important implications for system-wide stability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atzili, Boaz. 2006/07. When Good Fences Make Bad Neighbors: Fixed Borders, State Weakness, and International Conflict. International Security 31 (3):139–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoob, Mohammed. 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel, and Cronin, Bruce. 1994. The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations. International Organization 48 (1):107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan C.. 2000. EUGene: A Conceptual Manual. International Interactions 26 (2):179204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookman, Milica Zarkovic. 1992. The Economics of Secession. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 1997. Time Is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1414–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 2001. Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4):972–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. Decentralization: Fueling the Firs or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism? International Organization 60 (3):651–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, Lee C. 1978. Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, Anne Marie Slaughter. 1993. International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda. American Journal of International Law 87 (2):205–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel, Chalk, Peter, Hoffman, Bruce, Rosenau, William, and Brannan, David. 2001. Trends in Outside Support for Insurgent Movements. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Buhaug, Halvard, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2009. Ethno-Nationalist Dyads and Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):496525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, Jarat. 2003. Building State Failure in East Timor. In State Failure, Collapse, and Reconstruction, edited by Milliken, Jennifer, 223–44. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Connelly, Matthew. 2002. A Diplomatic Revolution: Algeria's Fight for Independence and the Origins of the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correlates of War Project. 2005. State System Membership List, v.2004.1. Available at ⟨http://correlatesofwar.org⟩. Accessed 22 March 2011.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. 2000. State Practice in International Law in Relation to Unilateral Secession. In Self-Determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned, edited by Bayefsky, Anne F.. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80 (4):1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Rupert. 1960. From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Community. 1992. Declaration on Yugoslavia and on the Guidelines on the Recognition of New States (16 December 1991). International Legal Materials 31 (6):1485–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2004. State Death in the International System. International Organization 58 (2):311–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2007. State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2004. Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer Than Others? Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart. 2004. The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2):133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5):615–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, Julius Jr. 1915. Recognition Policy of the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Raymond G. Jr., ed. 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 15th ed.Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Available at ⟨http://www.ethnologue.com/⟩. Accessed 22 March 2011.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32 (4):881912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Thomas D. 1999. The Recognition of States. Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2000. The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Secession in the Soviet Setting. British Journal of Political Science 30 (1):3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannum, Hurst. 1996. Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights. Rev. ed.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heraclides, Alexis. 1990. Secessionist Minorities and External Involvement. International Organization 44 (3):341–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Jeffery. 1996/97. Responding to State Failure in Africa. International Security 21 (3):120–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72 (3):2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel M., Bremer, Stuart A., and Singer, J. David. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2):163213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1997. International Relations and International Law: Two Optics. International Legal Theory 3 (1):26.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus. 2008. Irredentism in European Politics: Argumentation, Compromise, and Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidus, Gail W., and Zaslavsky, Victor, with Goldman, Philip, eds. 1992. From Union to Commonwealth: Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libal, Michael. 1997. Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991–1992. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy. 1995. The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993. American Political Science Review 89 (3):681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It? American Political Science Review 98 (2):209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2004. The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research. American Political Science Review 98 (4):653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review 87 (3):624–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset Users' Manual. University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minorities at Risk Project. 2008. Minorities at Risk Dataset. College Park, Md.: Center for International Development and Conflict Management. Available at ⟨http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/⟩. Accessed 22 March 2011.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1990. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen. 1992. Continuing Limits on UN Intervention in Civil War. Indiana Law Journal 67 (4):903–13.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS) 1933. Convention on Rights and Duties of States. Available at ⟨http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-40.html⟩. Accessed 1 February 2011.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. IV 1997. Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peceny, Mark, Beer, Caroline C., and Sanchez-Terry, Shannon. 2002. Dictatorial Peace? American Political Science Review 96 (1):1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Roland. 1993. Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. European Journal of International Law 4 (1):3665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip. 2007. Where Nation-States Come from: Institutional Change in the Age of Nationalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post–Cold War World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephan M. 1997. Explaining the International Relations of Secessionist Conflicts: Vulnerability Versus Ethnic Ties. International Organization 51 (4):721–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saideman, Stephan M. 2002. Discrimination in International Relations: Analyzing External Support for Ethnic Groups. Journal of Peace Research 39 (1):2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid, and Schafer, Phil. 2000. The Correlates of War Data on War: An Update to 1997. Conflict Management and Peace Science 18 (1):123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. 1972. The Wages of War, 1816–1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6 (1):503–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2005. Ending Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David. 1991. Anomaly and Commonplace in European Political Expansion: Realist and Institutional Accounts. International Organization 45 (2):143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2010. Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Uppsala Conflict Data Program/International Peace Research Institute (UCDP/PRIO). 2008. UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, Version 4-2008. Available at ⟨http://www.prio.no/sptrans/1664678440/Codebook.pdf⟩. Accessed 22 March 2011.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. n.d. The Case for Kosovo. Available at ⟨http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/kv/c24701.htm⟩. Accessed 22 March 2011.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2006a. Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2006b. Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede. International Organization 60 (1):105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2004 [1917/19]. The Vocation Lectures: Science as a Vocation, Politics as a Vocation. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1918. Address to Joint Session of Congress, 8 January 1918, Washington, D.C. Available at ⟨http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=62⟩. Accessed 2 February 2011.Google Scholar