Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:51:11.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2021

Emanuel Adler Open the ORCID record for Emanuel Adler [Opens in a new window]  and
Alena Drieschova Open the ORCID record for Alena Drieschova [Opens in a new window]
Get access

Abstract

Truth-subversion practices, which populist leaders utilize for political domination, are a significant source of current pressure on the Liberal International Order (LIO). Truth-subversion practices include false speak (flagrant lying to subvert the concept of facts), double speak (intentional internal contradictions in speech to erode reason), and flooding (the emission of many messages into the public domain to create confusion). Aiming to destroy liberal truth ideals and practices, truth subversion weakens epistemological security; that is, the experience of orderliness and safety that results from people's and institutions’ shared understandings of their common-sense reality. It privileges baseless claims over fact-based opinions, thus creating communities of the like-minded between which communication becomes impossible. Truth subversion challenges the LIO's three key institutions: democracy, markets, and multilateralism. If truth-subversion practices prevail, societal polarization, inaccurate information, and emotional inflaming strain democracy and human rights protections. Markets that depend for their functioning on accurate information can falter, and multilateralism that relies on communication and reasoned consensus can decay. International relations (IR) scholarship has recognized knowledge production practices as a key feature underlying the LIO, but has not yet identified challenges to those practices as a threat for the LIO. We discuss what the discipline can do to alleviate its blind spots.

Keywords

epistemic authorityepistemological securityliberal international orderpopulismpracticestruth subversion
Type
Internal Challenges to the Liberal International Order: Political
Information
International Organization , Volume 75 , Special Issue 2: Challenges to the Liberal International Order: International Organization at 75 , Spring 2021 , pp. 359 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. International Practices. International Theory 3 (1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2020. Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454>.Google Scholar
Allan, Bentley. 2018. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, Hunt, and Gentzkow, Matthew. 2017. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (2):211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harvest/ Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2006. Between Past and Future. Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard. 1981. Political Realism and Human Interest. International Studies Quarterly 25 (2):204–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard. 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 38 (2):225–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard, and Walker, Rob B.J.. 1990. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3):259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science 348 (6239):1130–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Ilan Zvi. 2018. How to Have Politics in a Post-Truth Era. Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, Michael, Mitchell, Amy, and Holcomb, Jesse. 2016. Majority Say Fake News Has Left Americans Confused About Basic Facts. Pew Research Centre. Available at <http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/pj_2016-12-15_fake-news_0-01/>. Accessed 15 December 2016..+Accessed+15+December+2016.>Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2001. Power Politics of Identity. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3):349–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, Sissela. 1999. Lying. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2021. Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence, Frieden, Jeffry, and Weymouth, Stephen. 2021. Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzas, Zoltan. 2021. Racism and Antiracism in the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000521>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders. Millennium 10 (2):126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth. Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald. 1997. Parchment, Printing, and Hypermedia. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Democracy Project. 2018. Reversing a Crisis of Confidence. Final Poll Report. Available at <https://www.democracyprojectreport.org/report>. Accessed 1 October 2020..+Accessed+1+October+2020.>Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Ikenberry, G. John. 1999. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25 (2):179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. Liberal World: The Resilient Order. Foreign Affairs July/August. <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-06-14/liberal-world>. Accessed 25 November 2020..+Accessed+25+November+2020.>Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl, Burrell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice Jr., Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L., and Van Wagenen, Richard W.. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Plattner, Marc, and Walker, Christopher, eds. 2016. Authoritarianism Goes Global. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eberwein, Tobias, and Porlezza, Colin. 2016. Both Sides of the Story: Communication Ethics in Mediatized Worlds. Journal of Communication 66 (2):328–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ezrahi, Yaron. 2012. Imagined Democracies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2021. The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000302>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Thomas M, and Ronald, Rogowski, 2021. Rising Inequality As a Threat to the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000163>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Freedom. 2018. Attacks on the Record: The State of Global Press Freedom, 2017–2018. Available at <https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-reports/attacks-record-state-global-press-freedom-2017-2018>. Accessed 1 October 2020..+Accessed+1+October+2020.>Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie. 2008/9. When Might Makes Right. International Security 33 (3):110–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Gulotty, Robert. 2021. America and the Trade Regime: What Went Wrong? International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000065X>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2021. The Exclusionary Foundations of Embedded Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000478>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2015. Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability. Perspectives on Politics 13 (1):42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, Michael, Coleman, Stephen, and Blumler, Jay. 2009. The End of Television? Its Impact on the World (So Far). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 625 (September):164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 2018. Preserving the Epistemic Authority of Science in World Politics. WZB Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Iakhnis, Evgeniia, Rathbun, Brian, Reifler, Jason, and Scott, Thomas. 2018. Populist Referendum: Was Brexit an Expression of Nativist and Anti-Elitist Sentiment? Research and Politics 5 (2):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2):167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver. 2011. The Same As It Never Was? Uncertainty and the Changing Contours of International Law. Review of International Studies 37 (5):2163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. ed. 1983. International Regimes. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Martin, Lisa L., and Risse, Thomas. 2021. Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000636>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laybats, Claire, and Tredinnick, Luke. 2016. Post Truth, Information, and Emotion. Business Information Review 33 (4):204–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazer, David M.J., Baum, Matthew A., Benkler, Yochai, Berinsky, Adam J., Greenhill, Kelly M., Menczer, Filippo, Metzger, Miriam J., Nyhan, Brendan, Pennycook, Gordon, Rothschild, David, Schudson, Michael, Sloman, Steven A., Sunstein, Cass R., Thorson, Emily A., Watts, Duncan J., and Zittrain, Jonathan L.. 2018. The Science of Fake News: Addressing Fake News Requires a Multidisciplinary Effort. Science 359 (6380):1094–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, Dan. 2003. Avoiding Tragedy in Power Politics: The Concert of Europe, Transparency, and Crisis Management. Security Studies 13 (2):159–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Rudra, Nita. 2021. Embedded Liberalism in the Digital Era. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000569>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Hannah, and Drieschova, Alena. 2018. Post-Truth Politics in the UK's Brexit Referendum. New Perspectives 26 (3):89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2011. Why Leaders Lie. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medina Serrano, Juan, Shahrezaye, Morteza, Papakyriakopoulos, Oretis, and Hegelich, Simon. 2019. The Rise of Germany's AfD: A Social Media Analysis. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Social Media and Society, 214–23. Association for Computing Machinery. Available at <https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328529.3328562>..' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3328529.3328562>CrossRef.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Medina+Serrano,+Juan,+Shahrezaye,+Morteza,+Papakyriakopoulos,+Oretis,+and+Hegelich,+Simon.+2019.+The+Rise+of+Germany's+AfD:+A+Social+Media+Analysis.+In+Proceedings+of+the+Tenth+International+Conference+on+Social+Media+and+Society,+214–23.+Association+for+Computing+Machinery.+Available+at+.>Google Scholar
Minkler, Lanse, and Miceli, Thomas. 2004. Lying, Integrity, and Cooperation. Review of Social Economy 62 (1):27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres. American Political Science Review 99 (3):401–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3):341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2017. A Culture of Growth. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natorski, Michal. 2016. Epistemic (Un)certainty in Times of Crisis: The Role of Coherence as a Social Convention in the European Neighborhood Policy after the Arab Spring. European Journal of International Relations 22 (3):646–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, Richard. 1973. On Watergate. Presidential Address, April 30, 1973. Available at <https://www.c-span.org/video/?299817-1/president-nixons-watergate-speech>. Accessed 1 October 2020..+Accessed+1+October+2020.>Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga. 2000. Transgressive Competence: The Narrative of Expertise. European Journal of Social Theory 3 (1):5–21.Google Scholar
Oates, Sarah. 2013. Revolution Stalled: The Political Limits of the Internet in the Post-Soviet Sphere. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orwell, George. 2008. 1984. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert and Colton, Joel.1995. A History of the Modern World to 1815. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, James. 2004. The Character Factor: How We Judge America's Presidents. Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Sophia. 2019. Democracy and Truth: A Short History. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2):379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1992. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization 46 (3):561–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Sebastian. 2020. The Task of Critique in Times of Post-Truth Politics. Review of International Studies. OnlineFirst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, Elisa, and Gottfried, Jeffrey. 2017. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017. Pew Research Center. Available at <www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/>. Accessed 7 September 2017..+Accessed+7+September+2017.>Google Scholar
Silverman, Craig. 2016. This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook. BuzzFeedNews. Available at <https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook>. Accessed 16 November 2016..+Accessed+16+November+2016.>Google Scholar
Silverman, Craig, and Singer-Vine, Jeremy. 2016. Most Americans Who See Fake News Believe It, New Survey Says. BuzzFeedNews. Available at. <https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey>. Accessed 6 December 2016..+Accessed+6+December+2016.>Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Goemans, Hein. 2021. Built on Borders: Tensions with the Institution Liberalism (Thought It) Left Behind. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000600>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Penguin.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 2001. What Anchors Cultural Practices. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Savigny, Eike Von, 74–92. Routledge.Google Scholar
Vosoughi, Soroush, Roy, Deb, and Aral, Sinan. 2018. The Spread of True and False News Online. Science 359 (1146–51):1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waisbord, Silvio. 2018. The Elective Affinity Between Post-Truth Communication and Populist Politics. Communication Research and Practice 4 (1):17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, William, and Luscombe, Alex. 2017. Hannah Arendt and the Art of Secrecy; Or the Fog of Cobra Mist. International Political Sociology 11 (1):5–20.Google Scholar
Werner-Mueller, Jan. 2019. The Pre-History of Post-Truth. Project Syndicate. Available at <https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/the-pre-history-of-post-truth-by-jan-werner-mueller-2019-04>. Accessed 1 October 2020..+Accessed+1+October+2020.>Google Scholar
What UK Thinks: EU. 2019. Should the United Kingdom Remain a Member of the European Union or Leave the European Union? NatCen Social Research, 2019. Available at <https://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/should-the-united-kingdom-remain-a-member-of-the-eu-or-leave-the-eu/> Accessed 1 October 2020.+Accessed+1+October+2020.>Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda T. 2015. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar