Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T12:50:29.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dispositional Theory of Reputation Costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Ryan Brutger  and
Joshua D. Kertzer
Get access

Abstract

Politicians frequently turn to reputational arguments to bolster support for their proposed foreign policies. Yet despite the prevailing belief that domestic audiences care about reputation, there is very little direct evidence that publics care about reputation costs, and very little understanding of how. We propose a dispositional theory of reputation costs in which citizens facing ill-defined strategic situations turn to their core predispositions about foreign affairs in order to weigh competing reputational dimensions. Employing a diverse array of methodological tools—from vignette-based survey experiments to automated text analysis—we show that the mass public has a “taste” for reputation, but understands it in fundamentally different ways, with hawks concerned about the negative reputational consequences of inconsistency, and doves equally concerned with the negative reputational consequences of belligerence and interventionism. In illustrating how reputation costs are in our heads, our findings offer both good and bad news for theories of reputation in IR.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , Summer 2018 , pp. 693 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and Genco, Stephen. 1977. Clouds, Clocks and the Study of Politics. World Politics 29 (4):489–522.Google Scholar
Bar-Isaac, Heski, and Deb, Joyee. 2014. What is a Good Reputation? Career Concerns with Heterogeneous Audiences. International Journal of Industrial Organization 34 (1):44–50.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Potter, Philip B.K.. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How The Public Inuences Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1974. A Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82 (6):1063–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2003. Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 1 (4):695–706.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics. Political Analysis 11 (3):209–33.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2001. Value Words and Lizard Brains: Do Citizens Deliberate About Appeals to Their Core Values? Political Psychology 22 (1):45–64.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel. 2009. Unpacking the State's Reputation. Harvard International Law Journal 50 (2):231–69.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel. 2011. The Limits of Reputation on Compliance. International Theory 1 (2):323–33.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E., and Skovron, Christopher. 2018. Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion Among American Political Elites. American Political Science Review. Published online 22 March <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000011>.Google Scholar
Brutger, Ryan. 2017. Domestic Politics of International Compromise. Working paper.Google Scholar
Carson, Austin. 2016. Facing Off and Saving Face: Covert Intervention and Escalation Management in the Korean War. International Organization 70 (1):103–31.Google Scholar
Chaudoin, Stephen. 2014. Promises or Policies? An Experimental Analysis of International Agreements and Audience Reactions. International Organization 68 (1):235–56.Google Scholar
Chittick, William O., Billingsley, Keith R., and Travis, Rick. 1995. A Three-Dimensional Model of American Foreign Policy Beliefs. International Studies Quarterly 39 (3):313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, Joe, and Danilovic, Vesna. 2010. Multiple Audiences and Reputation Building in International Conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (6):860–82.Google Scholar
Clare, Joe, and Danilovic, Vesna. 2012. Reputation for Resolve, Interests, and Conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 29 (1):3–27.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kevin A., and Primo, David M.. 2012. A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, William J. 1993. Address to the Nation on Somalia, 7 October. Available at <http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=47180>..>Google Scholar
Clinton, William J. 1994. Address to the Nation on Haiti, 15 September. Available at <http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=49093>..>Google Scholar
Crescenzi, Mark J.C. 2007. Reputation and Interstate Conflict. American Journal of Political Science 51 (2):382–96.Google Scholar
Crescenzi, Mark J.C., Kathman, Jacob D., Kleinberg, Katja B., and Wood, Reed M.. 2012. Reliability, Reputation, and Alliance Formation. International Studies Quarterly 56 (2):259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croco, Sarah E. 2011. The Decider's Dilemma: Leader Culpability, War Outcomes, and Domestic Punishment. American Political Science Review 105 (3):457–77.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Renshon, Jonathan, and Huth, Paul. 2014. Reputation and Status as Motives for War. Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1):371–93.Google Scholar
Davies, Graeme A.M., and Johns, Robert. 2013. Audience Costs Among the British Public: The Impact of Escalation, Crisis Type, and Prime Ministerial Rhetoric. International Studies Quarterly 57 (4):725–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Graeme A.M., and Johns, Robert. 2016. The Domestic Consequences of International Over-cooperation: An Experimental Study of Microfoundations. Conflict Management and Peace Science 33 (4):343–60.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? Journal of Politics 63 (4):1041–66.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 52–72. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All It's Cracked Up to Be. World Politics 61 (1):58–85.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, and Grieco, Joseph M.. 2015. Competency Costs in Foreign Affairs: Presidential Performance in International Conflicts and Domestic Legislative Success, 1953–2001. American Journal of Political Science 59 (2):440–56.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2008. Why Heuristics Work. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1):20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, Charles L. 1992. Political Consequences of Military Strategy: Expanding and Refining the Spiral and Deterrence Models. World Politics 44 (4):497–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., and Krebs, Ronald R.. 2015. Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies 24 (1):5–36.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Matthew S., and Trager, Robert F.. 2016. A Preference for War: How Fairness and Rhetoric Inuence Leadership Incentives in Crises. International Studies Quarterly 60 (2):243–57.Google Scholar
Grynaviski, Eric. 2014. Constructive Illusions: Misperceiving the Origins of International Cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra, and Smith, Alastair. 2002. Honest Threats: The Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (2):175–200.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., and Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and the Study of International Relations. International Organization 71 (S1):S1–S31.Google Scholar
Hermann, Charles F. 1990. Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 34 (1):3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard. 1988. The Empirical Challenge of the Cognitive Revolution: A Strategy for the Drawing Inferences About Perceptions. International Studies Quarterly 32 (2):175–203.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3):553–73.Google Scholar
Hill, Valerie, and Pillow, Bradford H.. 2006. Children's Understanding of Reputations. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development 167 (2):137–57.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 1991. Soviet Inferences from Their Victories in the Periphery: Visions of Resistance or Cumulating Gains? In Dominoes and Bandwagons: Strategic Beliefs and Great Power Competition in the Eurasian Rimland, edited by Jervis, Robert and Snyder, Jack, 145–89. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1987. How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? American Political Science Review 81 (4):1099–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1997. Reputations and Deterrence: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment. Security Studies 7 (1):72–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1999. Deterrence and International Conflict: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates. Annual Review of Political Science 2:25–48.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin H., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning About Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review 105 (4):765–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1979. Deterrence Theory Revisited. World Politics 31(2):289–324.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1982. Deterrence and Perception. International Security 7 (3):3–30.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Napier, Jaime L., Thorisdottir, Hulda, Gosling, Samuel D., Palfai, Tibor P., and Ostafin, Brian. 2007. Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated with Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (7):989–1007.Google Scholar
Kaarbo, Juliet. 2015. A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR. International Studies Review 17 (2):189–216.Google Scholar
Keeney, Ralph L., and Raiffa, Howard. 1993. Decisions with Multilple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017a. Microfoundations in International Relations. Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (1):81–97.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017b. Resolve, Time, and Risk. International Organization 71 (S1):S109–36.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., and Brutger, Ryan. 2016. Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):234–49.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., Powers, Kathleen, Rathbun, Brian C., and Iyer, Ravi. 2014. Do Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Preferences? Journal of Politics 76 (3):825–40.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., and Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2017. A Bottom-Up Theory of Public Opinion About Foreign Policy. American Journal of Political Science 61 (3):543–58.Google Scholar
Koopman, Cheryl, McDermott, Rose, Jervis, Robert, Snyder, Jack, and Dioso, Joe. 1995. Stability and Change in American Elite Beliefs About International Relations. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 1 (4):365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Cheryl, Snyder, Jack, and Jervis, Robert. 1990. Theory-Driven versus Data-Driven Assessment in a Crisis: A Survey of International Security Readers. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (4):694–722.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2007. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1):35–66.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., and Powell, Robert. 1999. International Relations: A Strategic-Choice Approach. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert, 3–38. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch. 1994. The Role of Belief Systems and Schemas in Foreign Policy Decision-Making. Political Psychology 15 (1):17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeck, Brad L., and Narang, Neil. 2017. How International Reputation Matters: Revisiting Alliance Violations in Context. International Interactions 43 (5):797–821.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S., and Horowitz, Michael C.. 2012. When Backing Down Is the Right Decision: Partisanship, New Information, and Audience Costs. Journal of Politics 74 (2):323–38.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2):279–312.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S., McKoy, Michael K., Poast, Paul, and Wallace, Geoffrey P.R.. 2015. Backing Out or Backing In? Commitment and Consistency in Audience Costs Theory. American Journal of Political Science 59 (4):988–1001.Google Scholar
Mattes, Michaela. 2012. Reputation, Symmetry, and Alliance Design. International Organization 66 (4):679–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscience for Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4):691–706.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Tingley, Dustin, Cowden, Jonathan, Frazzetto, Giovanni, and Johnson, Dominic D.P.. 2009. Monoamine Oxidase: A Gene (MAOA) Predicts Behavioral Aggression Following Provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (7):2118–23.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona, and Smith, Alastair. 2008. Punishing the Prince: A Theory of Interstate Relations, Political Institutions, and Leader Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McGovern, George S., and Polk, William R.. 2006. The Way Out of War: A Blueprint for Leaving Iraq Now. Harper's October: 31–39.Google Scholar
McMahon, Robert J. 1991. Credibility and World Power: Exploring the Psychological Dimension in Postwar American Diplomacy. Diplomatic History 15 (4):455–72.Google Scholar
Mead, Walter Russell. 2002. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mellers, B.A., Schwartz, A., and Cooke, A.D.J.. 1998. Judgment and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology 49:447–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):77–106.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, Matto, and Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Beliefs About Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics. British Journal of Political Science. Published online 4 December <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321>.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57 (1):45–56.Google Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer L. 1996. Metaphors of Prestige and Reputation in American Foreign Policy and American Realism. In Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations, edited by Beer, Francis A. and Hariman, Robert, 217–39. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres. American Political Science Review 99 (3):401–17.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Andre. 1972. Hawks and Doves, Isolationism and Political Distrust: An Analysis of Public Opinion on Military Policy. The American Political Science Review 66 (3):960–78.Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick. 1985. Saving Face for the Sake of Deterrence. In Psychology and Deterrence, edited by Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross, 125–52. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. 2004. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):395–435.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda M., and Davis, David R.. 2012. Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):1–16.Google Scholar
Murray, Shoon Kathleen. 1996. Anchors Against Change: American Opinion Leaders' Beliefs After the Cold War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Stephen C., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2014. Uncertainty, Risk, and the Financial Crisis of 2008. International Organization 68 (2):361–92.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32 (2):303–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1999. Honor, Symbols and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Philip B.K., and Baum, Matthew A.. 2014. Looking for Audience Costs in All the Wrong Places: Electoral Institutions, Media Access and Dispute Reciprocation. Journal of Politics 76 (1):167–81.Google Scholar
Poznansky, Michael. 2015. Statis or Decay? Reconciling Covert War and the Democratic Peace. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):815–26.Google Scholar
Press, Daryl G. 2005. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality. International Organization 71 (S1):S33–S60.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., Reifler, Jason, Goren, Paul, and Scotto, Thomas J.. 2016. Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes. International Studies Quarterly 60 (1):124–37.Google Scholar
Ravenal, Earl C. 1982. Counterforce and Alliance: The Ultimate Connection. International Security 6 (4):26–43.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, Dafoe, Allan, and Huth, Paul K.. 2018. Leader Influence and Reputation Formation in World Politics. American Journal of Political Science. First published 24 January online at <https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12335>.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Tingley, Dustin. 2014. STM: R Package for Structural Topic Models. R package version 1.0.8.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Tingley, Dustin, Lucas, Christopher, Leder-Luis, Jetson, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Albertson, Bethany, and Rand, David G.. 2014. Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):1064–82.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee. 1977. The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 173–220. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2005. Deterrence by Dipomacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2015. War and the Inner Circle: Democratic Elites and the Politics of Using Force. Security Studies 24 (3):466–501.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47–80.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Looking for Audience Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1):32–60.Google Scholar
Sechser, Todd S. 2010. Goliath's Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power. International Organization 64 (4):627–60.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P., and Dennis, Michael. 2007. Militant Islam and the Futile Fight for Reputation. Security Studies 16 (2):287–317.Google Scholar
Sharman, J.C. 2007. Rationalist and Constructivist Perspectives on Reputation. Political Studies 55 (1):20–37.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2010. Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science 13:273–96.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1973. The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence 4 (3–4):181–201.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 2002. Rational Choice and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 73–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Borghard, Erica D.. 2011. The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny, Not a Pound. American Political Science Review 105 (3):437–56.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice. 1994. Political Learning by Doing: Gorbachev as Uncommitted Thinker and Motivated Learner. International Organization 48 (2):155–83.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice. 2002. Psychological Explanations of International Conflict. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 292–308. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sylvan, Donald A., and Voss, James F.. 1998. Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Shiping. 2005. Reputation, Cult of Reputation, and International Conflict. Security Studies 14 (1):34–62.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. Policy-makers' Images of International Conict. Journal of Social Issues 39 (1):67–86.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1999. Theory-Driven Reasoning About Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics: Are We Prisoners of Our Preconceptions? American Journal of Political Science 43 (2):335–66.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Rising Power on the Mind. International Organization 71 (S1):S165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingley, Dustin, Yamamoto, Teppei, Hirose, Kentaro, Keele, Luke, and Imai, Kosuke. 2014. Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 59 (5):1–38. Available at <https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v059i05>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin H., and Walter, Barbara F.. 2011. The Effect of Repeated Play on Reputation Building: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 65 (2):343–65.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007a. Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 61 (4):821–40.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007b. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trager, Robert F., and Vavreck, Lynn. 2011. The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of Party. American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):526–45.Google Scholar
Voss, James F., and Post, Timothy A.. 1988. On the Solving of Ill-structured Problems. In The Nature of Expertise, edited by Chi, Michelene H., Glaser, Robert, and Farr, Marshall J., 261–85. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wallace, Geoffrey P.R. 2015. The Reputational Consequences of International Legal Commitments. Working paper.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2015. The Credibility Addiction. Foreign Policy, 6 January. Available at <http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/01/06/the-credibility-addiction-us-iraq-afghanistan-unwinnable-war/>.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2006. Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):313–30.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62 (1):35–64.Google Scholar
Weisiger, Alex, and Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2015. Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter In International Politics. International Organization 69 (2):473–95.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2018. Who Fights for Reputation in International Politics? Leaders, Resolve, and the Use of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren, and Holmes, Marcus. 2017. The Psychological Logic of Peace Summits: How Empathy Shapes Outcomes of Diplomatic Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly 61 (1):107–22.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Brutger and Kertzer supplementary material

Brutger and Kertzer supplementary material 1

Download Brutger and Kertzer supplementary material(File)
File 724.5 KB