Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T17:00:24.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaggregating Ethno-Nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

Halvard Buhaug ,
Lars-Erik Cederman  and
Jan Ketil Rød
Halvard Buhaug
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Norway. E-mail: [email protected]
Lars-Erik Cederman
Affiliation:
ETH, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Jan Ketil Rød
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, and theCentre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), PRIO, Oslo, Norway. E-mail: jan.rod\@svt.ntnu.no
Get access

Abstract

Contemporary conflict research usually measures the influence of ethnicity on conflict by capturing ethnic constellations as country-based indices, such as ethnic fractionalization or polarization. However, such aggregated measures are likely to conceal the actual operation of actor-specific mechanisms. In this article, therefore, we introduce a disaggregated model that measures ethnic groups' access to power. We do so by disaggregating both ethnicity and conflict to the level of explicitly geo-coded center-periphery dyads. This procedure allows us to measure the power balance between politically excluded ethnic groups and dominant actors in terms of group sizes, distances between the center and the periphery, and the roughness of the latter's terrain. We rely on geographic information systems (GIS) to compute demographic and ethno-geographic variables. The dyadic analysis enables us to show that exclusion of powerful ethnic minorities increases the likelihood of conflict considerably. In addition, we show that the risk of conflict is positively associated with the extent of rough terrain in the peripheral group's home region and its distance from the political center.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 531 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. 2002. Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science 5:423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2001. Throwing out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon. International Organization 55 (2):487–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series–Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth. 1962. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bruk, Salomon I., and Apenchenko, V. S.. 1964. Atlas Narodov Mira. Moscow: Academy of Science, USSR.Google Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard. 2006. Relative Capability and Rebel Objective in Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 43 (6):691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard. 2007. Dude, Where's My Conflict? LSG, Relative Strength, and the Location of Civil War. Unpublished manuscript, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2006. Local Determinants of African Civil Wars, 1970–2001. Political Geography 25 (3):315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Girardin, Luc. 2007. Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies. American Political Science Review 101 (1):173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Girardin, Luc, and Wimmer, Andreas. 2006. Getting Ethnicity Right: An Expert Survey on Power Distributions Among Ethnic Groups. Paper presented at the 102d Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Rød, Jan Ketil, and Weidmann, Nils. 2006. Geo-Referencing of Ethnic Groups: Creating a New Dataset. Unpublished manuscript, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). 2005. Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3). Available at ⟨http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw⟩. Accessed 13 January 2008.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars.” Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4):563–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardo, James. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2003. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2):195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., Kasara, Kimuli, and Laitin, David. 2007. Ethnic Minority Rule and Civil War Onset. American Political Science Review 101 (1):187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97 (1):75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5):712–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5):615–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, Chiozza, Giacomo, and Choung, Jinhee L.. 2004. Archigos: A Database on Political Leaders. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, N.Y.; and University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Hegre, Håvard, and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Sensitivity Analysis of Empirical Results on Civil War Onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (4):508–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6):1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1999. State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan, edited by Flora, Peter, Kuhnle, Stein, and Urwin, Derek. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2006. A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War. Annual Review of Political Science 9:265–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2004. Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics 2 (2):259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Inside Insurgencies: Political Violence in an Age of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3):587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles L., and Hudson, Michael C.. 1972. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. 2d ed.New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP)/World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC). 2002. Mountain Watch. New York: UNEP and WCMC.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2002. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar