Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-xkcpr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:53:52.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Regarding these writings in general, there is a great deal of published opinion to contrast with the contemptuous footnote on p. 405 of the Cox article. See, for instance, a brief evaluation in the British Yearbook of International Law, 1972–73, by the then Professor of International Law at Oxford, now a Judge of the International Court, and the Professor of International Law at Cambridge.

2 There was not, of course, in this case any suggestion of involvement of the administration in any wrongful conduct; such authorizations as had been given came from Mr. Cox himself.