Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:15:22.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Between power and purpose: central bankers and the politics of regulatory convergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

In the early 1980s, when the debt crisis threatened to disrupt the pattern of trade and investment flows that had evolved since the end of World War II, central bankers faced the challenge of maintaining public confidence in the commercial banks that were at the heart of the international payments system. Although the central bankers agreed that a run on one international bank could lead to a global catastrophe requiring massive government intervention, they did not initially agree on a policy project to strengthen the international payments system. In analyzing central bank cooperation and the processes leading to the adoption of a single international capital adequacy standard, this article argues that agreement on a uniform standard was due to a combination of political power and shared purpose on the part of the United States and Britain. While the article does not argue that the central bankers were an epistemic community as defined in this issue, it further explores the conditions under which epistemic communities are likely to arise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I thank Benjamin Cohen, Peter Cowhey, John Goodman, Peter Haas, Peter Katzenstein, Stephen Krasner, John Odell, Louis Pauley, M. J. Peterson, James Sebenius, and Glenn Tobin for their comments on earlier drafts of this article. I am also grateful to the many commercial bankers, central hankers, and bank supervisors who graciously granted my request for confidential interviews.

1. See Katzenstein, Peter, “Conclusion: Domestic Structures and Strategies of Foreign Economic Policy,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978), p. 296.Google Scholar

2. See ibid. For an application of hegemonic stability theory to the energy issue-area, see Kapstein, Ethan B., The Insecure Alliance: Energy Crises and Western Politics Since 1944 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

3. Baldwin, David, “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” in Knorr, Klaus, ed., Power, Strategy and Security (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983), p. 35.Google Scholar

4. Interview with a central banker from the Bank of England, London, 06 1991.Google Scholar

5. For more on this view of the behavior of regulators, see Peltzman, Sam, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (08 1976), pp. 211–40.Google Scholar

6. See Johnson, G. G., Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net (Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1983), p. 3Google Scholar. See also Dale, Richard, The Regulation of International Banking (Cambridge: Woodhead-Faulkner, 1984), pp. 161–62.Google Scholar

7. Dale, , The Regulation of International Banking, p. 162.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., p. 163.

10. Johnson, , Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net, p. 33.Google Scholar

11. Cohen, Benjamin J., ln Whose Interest? (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1986), p. 212.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., p. 218.

13. See ibid. See also Cline, William, International Debt and the Stability of the World Economy (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1983)Google Scholar; and Bird, Graham, “Loan Loss Provisions and Third World Debt,” Princeton Essays in International Finance, no. 176, 11 1989.Google Scholar

14. Crook, Clive, “The Limits of Cooperation,” The Economist, 26 09 1987, p. 49.Google Scholar

15. Cohen, , In Whose Interest? p. 214.Google Scholar

16. See, for example, Cline, , International Debt and the Stability of the World Economy;Google Scholar and Enders, Thomas and Mattion, Richard, Latin America: The Crisis of Debt and Growth (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1984).Google Scholar

17. See Sachs, Jeffrey, “Managing the LDC Debt Crisis,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity no. 2, 1986, pp. 397440.Google Scholar

18. Ibid.

19. For an analysis of the risk profiles of these instruments, see BIS, Recent Innovations in International Banking (Basle: BIS, 1986).Google Scholar

20. See Pecchioli, R. M., The Internationalisation of Banking (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1983).Google Scholar

21. See Johnson, , Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net, p. 1.Google Scholar

22. See Goodhart, Charles, The Evolution of Central Banks (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988).Google Scholar

23. See Kindleberger, Charles P., Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (New York: Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar

24. Johnson, , Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net, p. 1.Google Scholar

25. Ibid.

26. See Kindleberger, Charles P., The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).Google Scholar

27. Johnson, , Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net, p. 1.Google Scholar

28. Ibid.

29. Goodhart, , The Evolution of Central Banks, p. 1.Google Scholar

30. For a good overview of the debate, see Swoboda, Richard, eds., Threats to International Financial Stability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

31. Pecchioli, , The Internationalisation of Banking, p. 106.Google Scholar

32. Kapstein, , “Resolving the Regulator's Dilemma: International Coordination of Banking Regulations,” International Organization 43 (Spring 1989), pp. 323–47.Google Scholar“National Rules and Global Money,“ Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1991, p. 204.Google Scholar

33. BIS document, cited by Glenn Tobin in “National Rules and Global Money,” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1991, p. 204.

34. See BIS, The Management of Banks' Off-Balance-Sheet Exposures (Basle: BIS, 1986)Google Scholar; and BIS, Recent Innovations in International Banking (Basle: BIS, 1986).Google Scholar

35. See IMF, International Capital Markets (Washington, D.C.: IMF, 12 1986)Google Scholar; and Carron, Andrew S., “Financial Crises: Recent Experience in U.S. and International Markets,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 2, 1982, pp. 395“|Google ScholarBank Failures Trip Up Even Small Depositors,” Wall Street Journal, 11 01 1991, p. Cl.Google Scholar

36. See Lynn Asinoff, “Bank Failures Trip Up Even Small Depositors," Wall Street Journal, 11 January 1991, p. Cl

37. Interview with a member of the Federal Reserve system, Cambridge, Mass., 20 05 1991.Google Scholar

38. See Maisel, Sherman, Risk and Capital Adequacy in Commercial Banks (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981)Google Scholar; and Swary, Itzhak, Capital Adequacy Requirements and Bank Holding Companies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1980).Google Scholar

39. See Tobin, , “National Rules and Global Money,” pp. 204–6Google ScholarA Proposal for an International Deposit Insurance Corporation,” Princeton Essays in International Finance, no. 133, 07 1979.Google Scholar

40. Interview with a member of the Federal Reserve system, Cambridge, Mass., 20 May 1991.

41. For a review of these suggestions, see Dale, The Regulation of International Banking, pp. 180–81.

42. See Herbert Grubel, “A Proposal for an International Deposit Insurance Corporation," Princeton Essays in International Finance, no. 133, July 1979.

43. See Tobin, Glenn, “International Capital Adequacy Negotiation,” case study, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1989.Google Scholar

44. Interview with a member of the Federal Reserve system, Cambridge, Mass., 20 05 1991.Google Scholar

45. Cohen, , In Whose Interest? p. 295.Google Scholar

46. Burns, Arthur, “Speech to the American Bankers Association,“ Honolulu, Hawaii, 1972.Google Scholar

47. Interviews with central bankers from the Bank of England, London, 06 1991Google Scholar. See also Gardener, P. M., UK Banking Supervision (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986)Google Scholar; and Wesson, Bernard, Bank Capital and Risk (London: Institute of Bankers, 1985).Google Scholar

48. Interviews with officials of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 11 1990.Google Scholar

49. Seidman, William, “Bank Supervision in the United States,” in Dale, Richard, ed., Financial Deregulation (Cambridge: Woodhead-Faulkner, 1986), p. 78.Google Scholar

50. For discussions about deposit insurance, see Gardener, , UK Banking Supervision.Google Scholar

51. Interview with a member of the Federal Reserve system, Cambridge, Mass., 20 05 1991.Google Scholar

52. Federal Reserve Board, “Capital Maintenance: Supplemental Adjusted Capital Measure,” mimeograph, 24 01 1986.Google Scholar

53. American Bankers Association, statement sent to the Federal Reserve Board, 23 05 1986.Google Scholar

54. Interview with a member of the Federal Reserve system, Cambridge, Mass., 20 05 1991.Google Scholar

55. Tobin, , “National Rules and Global Money,” p. 221.Google Scholar

56. Paul Volcker, cited by Tobin in ibid.

57. See Kapstein, “Resolving the Regulator's Dilemma.”

58. Hayward, Peter, “Prospects for International Cooperation by Bank Supervisors,” The International Lawyer 24 (Fall 1990), p. 791.Google Scholar

59. See Kapstein, “Resolving the Regulator's Dilemma”; and Tobin, “National Rules and Global Money.”

60. Interview with a former official of the Bank of England, London, 25 06 1991.Google Scholar

61. For a development of this point in the context of macroeconomic policy coordination, see Putnam, Robert and Bayne, Nicholas, Hanging Together: Cooperation and Conflict in the Seven Power Summits (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

62. See Japanese Bank Stock Issues Set Record,” American Banker, 31 08 1987, p. 5.Google Scholar

63. BIS Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervisory Practices, “Proposals for International Convergence of Capital Measurements and Capital Standards,” mimeograph, 12 1987.Google Scholar

64. Interviews with officials of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 11 1990.Google Scholar

65. BIS Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervisory Practices, Report on International Developments in Banking Supervision, vol. 7 (Basle: BIS, 09 1990).Google Scholar

66. See, for example, Putnam, and Bayne, , Hanging Together.Google Scholar

67. See An Expanding Universe,” The Economist, 7–13 07 1990.Google Scholar