Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:33:13.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Joanne Gowa  and
Edward D. Mansfield
Joanne Gowa
Affiliation:
Joanne Gowa is the William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey. She can be reached at [email protected].
Edward D. Mansfield
Affiliation:
Edward D. Mansfield is the Hum Rosen Professor of Political Science and Director of the Christopher H. Browne Center for International Politics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He can be reached at [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The “new” trade theory and standard trade theory make different predictions about the composition and distribution of trade flows. Empirical evidence suggests that an increasing share of international trade consists of differentiated products, a consequence of increasing returns to scale. Nonetheless, the existing political science literature typically assumes that the conditions of standard theory hold. As such, the literature ignores the dynamic-inconsistency problem that imperfect markets can create. In doing so, it also ignores the fact that imperfect markets can shift the political prerequisites of open international markets. In this article we examine these shifts. We argue that alliances can support an optimal level of trade when scale economies rather than differences in relative factor endowments motivate it. Our empirical results support this argument, indicating that alliances exert a stronger influence on trade in goods produced under conditions of increasing rather than constant returns to scale.Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston; the 2002 Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New Orleans; and seminars at the University of Chicago (PIPES), the University of Colorado, Cornell University, Dartmouth College, New York University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Yale University. For helpful comments and suggestions, we are grateful to participants in these seminars and to Regina Baker, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, William Clark, Benjamin Cohen, Christina Davis, Eric Fisher, Avery Goldstein, Stephen Kobrin, Lisa Martin, Patrick McDonald, Helen Milner, Robert Powell, Dan Reiter, Anne Sartori, Branislav Slantchev, and Beth Yarbrough. We are also grateful to Regina Baker and Patrick McDonald for research assistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 775 - 805
Copyright
© 2004 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, July, Los Angeles, Calif.
Anderson, James E. 1979. A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69 (1):106–16.Google Scholar
Antweiler, Werner, and Daniel Trefler. 2002. Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade. American Economic Review 92 (1):93–119.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89 (3):634–47.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6:1–36.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam. 2000. EUGene: A Conceptual Manual. International Interactions 26 (2):179–204.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3):474–81.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1989. The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1):143–53.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1990. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis, and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade. Economic Journal 100 (403):1216–29.Google Scholar
Bidwell, R. L. 1970. Currency Conversion Tables: A Hundred Years of Change. London: Rex Collings.
Bliss, Harry, and Bruce Russett. 1998. Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962–1989. Journal of Politics 60 (4):1126–47.Google Scholar
Brown, John C. 1995. Imperfect Competition and Anglo-German Trade Rivalry: Markets for Cotton Textiles before 1914. The Journal of Economic History 55 (3):494–527.Google Scholar
Clarke, Roger A., and Dubravko J. I. Matko. 1983. Soviet Economic Facts, 1917–81. 2d ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Conybeare, John A. C. 1984. Public Goods, Prisoners' Dilemmas, and the International Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 28 (1):5–22.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1987. Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Correlates of War Project. 1993. Alliances Data. Unpublished data set, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Crafts, N. F. R., and Mark Thomas. 1986. Comparative Advantage in UK Manufacturing Trade, 1910–1935. Economic Journal 96 (383):629–45.Google Scholar
Davis, Donald R., and David E. Weinstein. 2001. What Role for Empirics in International Trade? Working Paper 8543. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Deardorff, Alan V. 1984. Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows. In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, edited by Ronald W. Jones and Peter B. Kenen, 467–517. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Deardorff, Alan V. 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In The Regionalization of the World Economy, edited by Jeffrey A. Frankel, 7–22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DeSouza, Patrick J. 1984–85. The Soviet Gas Pipeline Incident: Extension of Collective Security Responsibilities to Peacetime Commercial Trade. Yale Journal of International Law 10 (1):92–117.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash. 1992. Investment and Hysteresis. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (1):107–32.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S. 2002. International Institutions and Interstate Trade: Reassessing the Effects of Alliances and Preferential Trading Arrangements. International Politics 39 (3):271–91.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Jeffrey A. Frankel. 1995. Economic Regionalism: Evidence from Two 20th Century Episodes. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 6 (2):89–106.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Douglas A. Irwin. 1995. Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs, and the Reorientation of World Trade in the 1930s. Journal of International Economics 38 (1–2):1–24.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Douglas A. Irwin. 1998. The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows. In The Regionalization of the World Economy, edited by Jeffrey A. Frankel, 33–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foreman-Peck, James. 1983. A History of the World Economy: International Economic Relations Since 1850. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble.
France. 1919, 1924. Statistique Generale de La France, Annuaire Statistique. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Frankel, Jeffrey, Ernesto Stein, and Shang-Jin Wei. 1997. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Freund, Caroline, and John McLaren. 1999. On the Dynamics of Trade Diversion: Evidence from Four Trade Blocs. International Finance Discussion Paper 637. Washington, D.C.: Federal Reserve Board.
Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1):1–27.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2000. Preferences and the Democratic Peace. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):191–212.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Donald J. 1984. East-West Trade, Technology Transfer, and Western Security. In The Politics of East-West Trade, edited by Gordon B. Smith, 159–74. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gowa, Joanne, and Edward D. Mansfield. 1993. Power Politics and International Trade. American Political Science Review 87 (2):408–20.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Gregory, Paul R. 1982. Russian National Income, 1885–1913. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grubel, Herbert G., and P. J. Lloyd. 1975. Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: John Wiley.
Gurr, Ted Robert, Keith Jaggers, and Will H. Moore. 1989. Polity II: Political Structures and Regime Change, 1800–1986. [computer file] (study no. 9263). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 〈www.icpsr.umich.edu〉.
Helpman, Elhanan. 1998. The Structure of Foreign Trade. Working Paper 6752. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Helpman, Elhanan. 1999. The Structure of Foreign Trade. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2):121–44.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul R. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hummels, David, and James Levinsohn. 1993. Product Differentiation as a Source of Comparative Advantage? American Economic Review 83 (2):445–49.Google Scholar
Italy Central Office of Statistics (Ufficio Centrale de Statistica). 1916. Annuario Statistico Italiano, Seconda Serie. Vol. VI. Roma: Tip. Elzeviriana.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data. Journal of Peace Research 32 (4):469–82.Google Scholar
Japan Department of Finance. 1918, 1924, 1939. Financial and Economic Annual of Japan. Tokyo: Government Printing Office.
Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2):163–213.Google Scholar
Judge, George G., et al. 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley.
Kenwood, A. G., and A. L. Lougheed. 1992. The Growth of the International Economy, 1820–1990. 3d ed. New York: Routledge.
Keohane, Robert O. 1982. The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization 36 (2):325–55.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kim, Soo Yeon. 1998. Ties That Bind: The Role of Trade in International Conflict Processes, 1950–1992. Ph.D. diss., Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krugman, Paul. 1980. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review 70 (5):950–59.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, and Maurice Obstfeld. 2000. International Economics: Theory and Policy. 5th ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.
Liesner, Thelma. 1989. One Hundred Years of Economic Statistics. New York: Facts on File.
McLaren, John. 1997. Size, Sunk Costs, and Judge Bowker's Objection to Free Trade. American Economic Review 87 (3):400–20.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 1991. Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maddison, Angus. 1995. Monitoring the World Economy, 1820–1992. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Maizels, Alfred. 1963. Industrial Growth and World Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Rachel Bronson. 1997a. Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 91 (1):94–107.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Rachel Bronson. 1997b. The Political Economy of Major-Power Trade Flows. In The Political Economy of Regionalism, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner, 188–208. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305–21.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 2001. Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (DYMID 1.1) Data Set. Available at 〈http://spirit.tau.ac.il/poli/faculty/maoz/dyadmid〉. Accessed 15 July 2004.
Milward, Alan S. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, Brian R. 1992. International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–1988. 3d ed. New York: Stockton Press.
Mitchell, Brian R. 1995. International Historical Statistics: Africa, Asia, and Oceania, 1750–1988. 2d ed. New York: Stockton Press.
Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson, and Tressa E. Taberes. 1998. The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990. American Political Science Review 92 (3):649–61.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson, and Tressa E. Taberes. 1999. Correction to “The Political Determinants of International Trade.” American Political Science Review 93 (4):931–33.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard, and Gavin Wright. 1992. The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 30 (4):1931–64.Google Scholar
Nolde, Baron Boris E. 1928. Russia in the Economic War. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1999. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Pahre, Robert. 1999. Leading Questions: How Hegemony Affects the International Political Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rose, Andrew. 2004. Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? American Economic Review 94 (1):98–114.Google Scholar
Rose, Andrew. Forthcoming. Which International Institutions Promote International Trade? Review of International Economics.
Signorino, Curtis S., and Jeffrey M. Ritter. 1999. Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1):115–44.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816–1992. [computer file] (study no. 9905). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 〈www.icpsr.umich.edu〉.
Small, Melvin, and David J. Singer. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers. 1948–53. Japanese Economic Statistics. Tokyo: Japanese Economic Planning Agency.
Tirole, Jean. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tussie, Diane. 1987. The Less Developed Countries and the World Trading System: A Challenge to the GATT. London: Frances Pinter.
United Nations. 1951. Yearbook of International Trade Statistics, 1950. New York: Statistical Office of the United Nations.
U.S. Arms Control and Development Agency. 1983, 1994, 1999. World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1924, 1934, 1947, 1962, 1996. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1942. Foreign Commerce Yearbook, 1939. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1950. Foreign Commerce Yearbook, 1948. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Various years. Monthly Summary of Foreign Commerce of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
World Bank. Various years. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Wright, Gavin. 1986. Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy Since the Civil War. New York: Basic Books.
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Robert M. Yarbrough. 1986. Reciprocity, Bilateralism, and Economic “Hostages”: Self-Enforcing Agreements in International Trade. International Studies Quarterly 30 (1):7–21.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Robert M. Yarbrough. 1992. Cooperation and Governance in International Trade: The Strategic Organizational Approach. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.