Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:53:40.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transborder Ethnic Kin and Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2013

Lars-Erik Cederman ,
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch ,
Idean Salehyan  and
Julian Wucherpfennig
Lars-Erik Cederman
Affiliation:
Center for Comparative and International Studies at ETH Zürich and University of Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
Affiliation:
University of Essex, United Kingdom, and Peace Research Institute, Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]
Idean Salehyan
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Denton, and theSocial Conflict in Africa Database project. E-mail: [email protected]
Julian Wucherpfennig
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A series of studies has shown that civil wars are caused not only by factors inside countries, but also by effects operating across state borders. Whereas a first wave of quantitative studies demonstrated that such effects make the “closed-polity” assumption untenable, more recently researchers have identified particular causal mechanisms driving conflict. Despite these recent advances, a central puzzle remains unresolved, namely why ethnic groups that at least in theory could count on support from large transborder ethnic kin (TEK) groups often have remained surprisingly peaceful, such as the stranded Russian populations in the “near abroad.” We propose a theoretical framework that extends the analysis from the primary dyad between the incumbent and the challenger group by adding a secondary dyad that pits the incumbent against the TEK group. We postulate a curvilinear effect of the TEK group's relative size on conflict onset. Using a new data set on transnational ethnic links, we find that that the risk of conflict increases within the middle range of the size spectrum, consistent with our main hypothesis. This means that large TEK groups have a conflict-dampening effect, provided that they control their own state. Excluded TEK groups, however, are not associated with lower conflict probabilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 389 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard M.. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainey, Geoffrey. 1973. The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruk, Solomon I., and Apenchenko, V.S., eds. 1964. Atlas Narodov Mira (Atlas of the Peoples of the World). Moscow: Glavnoe Upravlenie Geodezii I Kartografi.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Buhaug, Halvard, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2009. Ethno-Nationalist Dyads and Civil War: A GIS-Based Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):496–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Girardin, Luc, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2009. Ethnonationalist Triads: Assessing the Influence of Kin Groups on Civil Wars. World Politics 61 (3):403–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Wimmer, Andreas, and Min, Brian. 2010. Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis. World Politics 62 (1):87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetinyan, Rupen. 2002. Ethnic Bargaining in the Shadow of Third-Party Intervention. International Organization 56 (3):645–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazan, Naomi, ed. 1991. Irredentism and International Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4):563–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, Walker. 1994. Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, David R., and Moore, Will H.. 1997. Ethnicity Matters: Transnational Ethnic Alliances and Foreign Policy Behavior. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2005. Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and Collective Emotions in Contentious Politics. Theory and Society 34 (5-6):469–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict. In The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation, edited by Lake, David A. and Rothchild, Donald, 107–26. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, Daniel S. 1993. Power Differentials and War in Rival Dyads. International Studies Quarterly 37 (2):173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2007. Transnational Dimensions of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 44 (3):293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5):615–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2001. Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4:139–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff. 1997. State-Centered Approaches to Social Revolutions: Strengths and Limitations of a Theoretical Tradition. In Theorizing Revolutions, edited by Foran, John, 9–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. 1991. Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review 56 (6):716–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Heger, Lindsay, and Salehyan, Idean. 2007. Ruthless Rulers: Coalition Size and the Severity of Civil Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 51 (2):385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, Håvard, Ellingsen, Tanja, Gates, Scott, and Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2001. Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review 95 (1):33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heraclides, Alexis. 1990. Secessionist Minorities and External Involvement. International Organization 44 (3):341–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1988. Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenne, Erin K. 2007. Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2008. Ethnic Defection in Civil War. Comparative Political Studies 41 (8):1043–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Charles, and Melvin, Neil J.. 1999/2000. Diaspora Politics: Ethnic Linkages, Foreign Policy, and Security in Eurasia. International Security 24 (3):108–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Douglas, and Werner, Suzanne. 1996. Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War. International Studies Quarterly 40 (2):235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger D. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2003. Exploring the Bargaining Model of War. Perspectives on Politics 1 (1):27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 2001. The Ties That Divide: Ethnic Politics, Foreign Policy, and International Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M., and Ayres, R. William. 2000. Determining the Causes of Irredentism: Logit Analyses of Minorities at Risk Data from the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Politics 62 (4):1126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M., and Ayres, R. William. 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehyan, Idean. 2009. Rebels Without Borders: Transnational Insurgencies in World Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Salehyan, Idean, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2006. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization 60 (2):335–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2001. Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part 1). Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3):259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shain, Yossi, and Barth, Aharon. 2003. Diasporas and International Relations Theory. International Organization 57 (3):449–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thyne, Clayton L. 2006. Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences: The Effect of Interstate Relations on Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6):937–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1994. Hypotheses on Nationalism and War. International Security 18 (4):5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Houten, Pieter. 1998. The Role of a Minority's Reference State in Ethnic Relations. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 39 (1):110–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2000. Bargaining and War. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):469–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2009. Bargaining Failures and Civil War. Annual Review of Political Science 12:243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., Rød, Jan Ketil, and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2010. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):491–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1971. The Macedonian Syndrome: An Historical Model of International Relations and Political Development. World Politics 23 (4):665–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodwell, Douglas. 2004. Unwelcome Neighbors: Shared Ethnicity and International Conflict During the Cold War. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Metternich, Nils W., Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2012. Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War. World Politics 64 (1):79–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. 2001. The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization 55 (2):215–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cederman et al. supplementary materail

Supplementary data

Download Cederman et al. supplementary materail(File)
File 2.7 MB