Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:14:00.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory and Practice of Regional Integration: The Case of Comecon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Andrzej Korbonski
Get access

Extract

It is generally recognized that the last decade or so witnessed a proliferation of studies dealing with different aspects of regional integration. While most of them discussed the origin and history of various international organizations, some, especially those of a more recent vintage, ventured into the thicket of theory building in an effort to engage eventually in some kind of comparative analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1970 , pp. 942 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Associate professor of political science at the University of California, Los Angeles.

References

1 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict (Rev. and enl. ed; Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 107–124Google Scholar.

2 Stupov, A. D. (ed.), Ekpnomicheskpe sotrudnichestvo i vzaiimopomoshch sotsialisticheskjkh stran (Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1962)Google Scholar; Faddeev, N., Sovet ekpnomicheskpi vzaiimopomoshchi (Moscow: Ekonomika, 1964)Google Scholar; Ciamaga, L., Od wspolpracy do integracji: Zarys organizacji i dzialalnosci RWPG w latach 1949–1964 (Warsaw: Ksiazka i wiedza, 1965)Google Scholar; Bodnar, A., Rozwoj gospodarczy krajow RWPG i problemy miedzynarodowego podzialu pracy (Warsaw: Panstwowe wydawnictwo ekonomiczne, 1966)Google Scholar; Novozamsky, J., Vyrovnavani ekonomicke urovne zemi RVHP (Prague: Nakladatelstvi politicke literatury, 1964)Google Scholar; Maly, Bohuslov, Mezinarodni ekpnomicke vztahy tie spolecenstvi RVHP (Prague: Svoboda, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 Korbonski, Andrzej, “Comecon,” International Conciliation, 09 1964 (No. 549)Google Scholar; Agoston, I., Le marché comtnun communiste: Principes et pratique du COMECON (2nd ed; Geneva: Droz, 1965)Google Scholar; Köhler, Heinz, Economic Integration in the Soviet Bloc (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1965)Google Scholar; Kaser, Michael, Comecon: Integration Problems of the Planned Economies (2nd ed; London: Oxford University Press [under die auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs], 1967)Google Scholar; Kaser, Michael (ed.), Economic Development for Eastern Europe: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economics Association (London: Macmillan & Co., 1968), pp. 125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiles, P. J. D., Communist International Economics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), pp. 306–342Google Scholar.

4 For a good example see Brown, Alan A. and Neuberger, Egan (ed.), International Trade and Central Planning: An Analysis of Economic Interactions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

5 Meyer, A. G., “USSR Incorporated,” Slavic Review, 10 1961 (Vol. 20, No. 3), pp. 369–376,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and “The Comparative Study of Communist Political Systems,” Slavic Review, 03 1967 (Vol. 21, No. 1), pp. 3–12Google Scholar; Skilling, H. G., “Interest Groups and Communist Politics,” World Politics, 04 1966 (Vol. 18, No. 3), pp. 435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 A recent example is Grossman, Gregory (ed.), Money and Plan: Financial Aspects of East European Economic Reforms (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

7 Fred N. Hayward in this volume.

8 Philippe C. Schmitter in this volume, p. 837.

9 Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957). P. 98Google Scholar.

10 Fred M. Hayward, draft revision of the paper prepared for the Conference on Regional Integration.

11 Nye, Joseph S., “Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement,” International Organization, Autumn 1968 (Vol. 22, No. 4), p. 858CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Korbonski, Andrzej, “The Warsaw pact,” Internal Conciliation, 05 1969 (No. 573), pp. 67–73Google Scholar.

13 Nye, , International Organization, Vol. 22, No. 4, p. 861Google Scholar.

14 Montias, J. M., “Obstacles to the Economic Integration of Eastern Europe,” Studies in Comparative Communism, 07–10 1969 (Vol. 2, Nos. 3–4), p. 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Nye, , International Organization, Vol. 22, No. 4, p. 861Google Scholar.

16 Montias, J. M., “Problems of Integration,” World Politics, 07 1966 (Vol. 18, No. 4), p. 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Cf. United Nations Document ST/CID/7.

18 The section that follows is a revised version of a paper, “Recent Developments in the Comecon,” presented at a meeting of the University of California Project on Comparative Study of Communist Societies, Berkeley, April 21, 1966.

19 For a list of these commissions see Kaser, pp. 257–261.

20 Neuberger, E., “International Division of Labor in CEMA: Limited Regret Strategy,” American Economic Review, 05 1964 (Vol. 54, No. 3), p. 515Google Scholar.

21 Full text in Pravia, June 17, 1962.

22 For an interesting Romanian exposition of this view see Montias, J. M., “Background and Origin of the Rumanian Dispute with Comecon,” Soviet Studies, 10 1964 (Vol. 16, No. 2), pp. 131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Personal interviews in Prague and Warsaw during the spring and summer of 1967.

24 Bodnar, A., “Rok 1962–przelomowy w rozwoju RWPG,” Cospodarka planowa (Warsaw), 01 1963 (Vol. 18, No. 1), p. 15Google Scholar.

25 Personal interviews in Prague and Warsaw during the spring and summer of 1967.

26 Personal interviews in Prague during the spring of 1967.

27 For an excellent treatment of this problem see Nove, Alec, The Soviet Economy: An Introduction (Rev. ed; New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1966), chapter 6Google Scholar.

28 Personal interviews in Prague during the spring of 1967.

29 This summary is based on Bodnar, A., “Podzial pracy w przemysle maszynowym krajow RWPG,” Zycie gospodarcze (Warsaw), 1966 (Vol. 9, No. 11), p. 8Google Scholar.

30 Ibid; Keh, Z., “Kierunki prac,” Zycie gospodarcze, 1966 (Vol. 9, No. 17), p. 1Google Scholar.

31 Prague, Radio, 03 29, 1966; Figyelo (Budapest), 05 11, 1966 (Radio Free Europe Hungarian Press Survey, No. 1714)Google Scholar.

32 Personal interviews in Prague and Warsaw during the spring and summer of 1967.

33 Economic Survey of Europe 1966 (New York: United Nations, 1967), chapter 3, pp. 2–7Google Scholar.

34 Ausch, S., “Mezinarodni delba prace a ekonomicky mechanismus,” Vlanovane hospodarstvi (Prague), 12 1965 (No. 12), p. 66Google Scholar.

35 Personal interviews in Prague during the spring of 1967.

36 For a good discussion see Economic Survey of Europe 1967 (New York: United Nations, 1968), chapter 2, pp. 71–79Google Scholar.

37 Berger, W., “The Technological Revolution and Economic Cooperation among Socialist Countries,” World Marxist Review, 04 1965 (Vol. 8, No. 4), p. 17Google Scholar.

38 Csikos-Nagy, B., “Currency and Price Problems in Socialist Economic Integration,” Gospodarka planowa, 08 1969 (Vol. 24, No. 8)Google Scholar.

39 For an excellent treatment of foreign trade pricing see United Nations, Economic Bulletin for Europe, 1964 (Vol. 16, No. 2), pp. 42–44Google Scholar.

40 Ausch, , Planovane hospodarstvi, No. 12, p. 66Google Scholar. See also Marer, P., ASTE Bulletin, Fall 1968 (Vol. 10, No. 2), p. 8Google Scholar.

41 Cf. Bogomolov, O., “Khoziaistvovny reformy i ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo sotsialisticheskikh stran,” Voprosy ekpnomify (Moscow), 1966 (No. 2), pp. 76–86Google Scholar, and “Aktualne problemy ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva sotsialisticheskikh stran,” Mirovaia ckonomika i mezhdimarodnye otnoshenia (Moscow), 1966 (No. 5), pp. 15–26Google Scholar; and Ladygin, V. and Shirayev, Y., “Voprosy sovershenstvovania ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva stran SEV,” Voprosy ekpnomikj, 1966 (No. 5), pp. 81–89Google Scholar.

42 New York Times, January 7, 1968; Shonfield, A., “Changing Commercial Policies in the Soviet Bloc,” International Affairs (London), 01 1968 (Vol. 44, No. 1), p. 11Google Scholar.

43 Bogomolov, , Voprosy ekpnomikj, No. 2, p. 85Google Scholar; Wiles, pp. 248–250.

44 Personal interviews in Prague during the spring of 1967.

45 Babitchev, E., “The International Bank for Economic Cooperation,” in Grossman, pp. 148–152Google Scholar. Since the completion of this article there were further developments in the Comecon banking field. Following a series of discussions regarding the ways and means of strengthening the organization, culminating in a Comecon “summit” meeting in April 1969, a Comecon investment bank was formally established in July 1970. Its basic purpose is to finance investment projects in the various member countries which would benefit the organization as a whole. The bank is to start operating in 1971. Schaefer, Henry, “What Role for Comecon?” Radio Free Europe Research Reports in Economics, 04 1970 (No. 1)Google Scholar, and “Recent Developments Involving the Comecon Investment Bank,” ibid., July 30, 1970 (No. 5); Harry Trend, “The Comecon Investment Bank,” ibid., June 15, 1970 (No. 2); Heiss, Hertha W., “The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance—Developments since the Mid-1960's,” in United States Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Economic Developments in Countries of Eastern Europe (Washington: Govenment Printing Office, 1970), pp. 528–542Google Scholar.

46 Rosenau, James (ed.), Linkage Politics: Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems (New York: Free Press, 1969), pp. 49–56Google Scholar.

47 Aspaturian, Vernon V., “Soviet Foreign Policy at the Crossroads: Conflict and/or Collaboration?” International Organization, Summer 1969 (Vol. 23, No. 3), p. 598CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Jowitt, K., “Revolutionary Breakthroughs and National Development: The Case of Romania 1944–1965” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1970), pp. 231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Skilling, , World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3Google Scholar; and A. Korbonski, “Bureaucracy and Interest Groups in Communist Societies: The Case of Czechoslovakia,” Studies in Comparative Communism(forthcoming).

50 Personal interviews in Prague and Warsaw during the spring and summer of 1967.

51 See p. 963 above.

52 Brzezinski, pp. 433–455.

53 For the best treatment of Romania's attitude see Montias, J. M., Economic Development in Communist Rumania (Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1967), pp. 187–230Google Scholar.

54 See p. 960 above.

55 Korbonski, , International Conciliation, No. 573, pp. 71–73Google Scholar.

56 Economic Survey of Europe 1967, chapter 2, pp. 79–84.

57 Shulman, Marshall D., “The Communist States and Western Integration,” Problems of Communism, 09–10 1963 (Vol. 12, No. 5), pp. 47–54Google Scholar.

58 Haas, Ernst B. and Schmitter, Philippe C., “Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America,” International Organization, Autumn 1964 (Vol. 18, No. 4), p. 720CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 J. S. Nye in this volume.

60 For a somewhat different interpretation of the role of the Soviet Union see Kaiser, Karl, “The Integration of Regional Subsystems: Some Preliminary Notes on Recurrent Patterns and the Role of the Superpowers,” World Politics, 10 1968 (Vol. 21, No. 1), pp. 99ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Kaser, pp. 202–205.

62 Montias, J. M., “Obstacles to the Economic Integration of Eastern Europe,” paper prepared for the Bruges, Semaine de, College of Europe, Bruges, Belgium, 1969, p. 5Google Scholar.

63 For details see Economic Survey of Europe 1966, chapter 3, sections 2 and 4.

64 Cf. Holzman, F., “More on Soviet Bloc Trade Discrimination,” Soviet Studies, 07 1965 (Vol. 17, No. 1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiles, pp. 222–248; Marer, , ASTE Bulletin1, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 6–7Google Scholar; and Kaser, pp. 182–185.

65 See p. 960 above.

66 Gehlen, Michael, “The Integrative Process in East Europe: A Theoretical Framework,” The Journal of Politics, 02 1968 (Vol. 30, No. 1), pp. 90–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Ibid., p. 112.

68 Ibid.

69 D. Finley, “Integration among the Communist Party-States: Comparative Case Studies,” and Mitchell, R., “A Theoretical Approach to the Study of Communist International Organizations,” in Triska, J. (ed.), Communist Party States: Comparative and International Studies (Indianapolis, Ind: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1969), pp. 57–105Google Scholar.

70 Mitchell, in Triska, p. 103.

71 Montias, J. M., Studies in Comparative Communism, Vol. 2, Nos. 3–4, pp. 38–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Ibid., p. 41.

73 Korbonski, A., “Some Random Thoughts on Ecoonmic Integration of Eastern Europe,” paper prepared for the Conference on Regional Integration, Madison, Wisconsin, 04 1969, p. 13Google Scholar.

74 Montias, p. 60.

75 Aspaturian, , International Organization, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 595Google Scholar.

76 Rosenau, pp. 44–63.

77 Burks, R. V., “The Communist Polities of Eastern Europe,” in Rosenau, , pp. 275–303Google Scholar.

78 Rosenau, p. 59.