Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T01:31:15.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

Michèle B. Bättig  and
Thomas Bernauer
Michèle B. Bättig
Affiliation:
Econcept AG in Zurich, Switzerland, E-mail: [email protected]
Thomas Bernauer
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) and the Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED)in Zurich, Switzerland, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article examines whether democracies contribute more to the provision of global public goods. It thus contributes to the debate on the effects of domestic institutions on international cooperation. The focus is on human-induced climate change, in Stern's words “the biggest market failure the world has ever seen.”1 Using new data on climate change cooperation we study a cross-section of 185 countries in 1990–2004. The results show that the effect of democracy on levels of political commitment to climate change mitigation (policy output) is positive. In contrast, the effect on policy outcomes, measured in terms of emission levels and trends, is ambiguous. These results demonstrate that up until now the democracy effect has not been able to override countervailing forces that emanate from the free-rider problem, discounting of future benefits of climate change mitigation, and other factors that cut against efforts to reduce emissions. Even though democracies have had a slow start in moving from political and legal commitments (policy output) to emission reductions (policy outcomes), particularly in the transportation sector, we observe some encouraging signs. The main implication of our findings for research on international politics is that greater efforts should be made to study policy output and outcome side by side. This will help in identifying whether more democratic countries experience larger “words-deeds” gaps also in other policy areas, and whether there are systematic differences of this kind between domestic and international commitments and across different policy areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 281 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aerni, Philipp. 2005. Private Management of Public Trust: The Changing Nature of Political Protest. Unpublished manuscript. Available at ⟨http://www.iaw.agrl.ethz.ch/people⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Antweiler, Werner, Copeland, Brian R., and Taylor, M. Scott. 2001. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review 91 (4):877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 2005. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott, and Graddy, Kathryn. 2000. Freedom, Growth, and the Environment. Environment and Development Economics 5 (4):433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bättig, Michèle B., Brander, Simone, and Imboden, Dieter M.. 2008. Measuring Countries' Cooperation Within the International Climate Change Regime. Environmental Science & Policy 11 (6):478–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bättig, Michèle B., Wild, Martin, and Imboden, Dieter M.. 2007. A Climate Change Index: Where Climate Change May Be Most Prominent in the 21st Century. Geophysical Research Letters 34 (L01705):1–6.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas. 2003. Genes, Trade, and Regulation. The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Caduff, Ladina. 2004. In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation. Journal of Public Policy 24 (1):99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Koubi, Vally. 2009. Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality. Ecological Economics 68 (5):1355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Kuhn, Patrick. Forthcoming. Is There an Environmental Version of the Kantian Peace? Insights from Water Pollution in Europe. European Journal of International Relations. Available at ⟨http://www.ib.ethz.ch/docs⟩. Accessed 27 January 2009.Google Scholar
British Petroleum (BP). 2007. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Available at ⟨http://www.bp.com/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 2001. Political Competition and Economic Growth. Journal of Democracy 12 (1):58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2000. Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (4):425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Loren R. 2006. The Failures of American and European Climate Policy: International Norms, Domestic Politics, and Unachievable Commitments. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT). 2008. World Resources Institute. Available at ⟨http://cait.wri.org/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Cole, Matthew A., and Neumayer, Eric. 2005. Environmental Policy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Can Developing Countries Escape the Detrimental Consequences of Economic Growth? In Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, edited by Dauvergne, Peter, 298–318. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Congleton, Roger D. 1992. Political Institutions and Pollution Control. Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (3):412–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2006. The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5):690–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Uday. 1998. Ecological Policy and Politics in Developing Countries: Economic Growth, Democracy, and Environment. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Diekmann, Andreas, and Franzen, Axel. 1999. The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior 31 (4):540–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorussen, Han, and Ward, Hugh. 2008. Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (2):189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI). 2008. Environmental Performance Measurement Project. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University. Available at ⟨http://www.yale.edu/esi/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Franzen, Axel, and Meyer, Reto. 2004. Klimawandel des Umweltbewusstseins? Eine Analyse des ISSP 2000. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33 (2):119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2006. Available at ⟨http://www.freedomhouse.org⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Germanwatch. 2008. Climate Change Performance Index. Available at ⟨http://www.germanwatch.org/ccpi.htm⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2006. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Available at ⟨http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/exptradegdp.html⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Sverdrup, Bjorn Otto. 2003. Democracy and the Environment. In Human Security and the Environment: International Comparisons, edited by Page, Edward A. and Redclift, Michael, 45–70. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Krueger, Alan B.. 1995. Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (2):353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., von Stein, Jana, and Gartzke, Erik. 2008. International Organizations Count. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (2):175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helm, Carsten, and Sprinz, Detlef F.. 2000. Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (5):630–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2007. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971–2005. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change 2007. Report available at ⟨http://www.ipcc.ch⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef. 2008. The Politics of Climate Change. Paper presented at the 5th Annual General Conference of the European Consortium for Political ResearchAprilRennes France.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2008. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Li, Quan, and Reuveny, Rafael. 2006. Democracy and Environmental Degradation. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4):935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 2007. Historical Statistics. Available at ⟨http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2007. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions. Available at ⟨http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
McGuire, Martin, and Olson, Mancur. 1996. The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force. Journal of Economic Literature 34 (2):72–96.Google Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I. 1998. Democracy and the Environment: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Peace Research 35 (3):341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1):5–34.Google Scholar
Murdoch, James C., and Sandler, Todd. 1997. The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good: The Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol. Journal of Public Economics 63:331–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2002. Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Peace Research 39 (2):139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1968. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. Dictatorship, Democracy and Development. American Political Science Review 87 (3):567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A., and Maxwell, James H.. 1994. Self-Interest and Environmental Management. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (4):593–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paehlke, R. 1996. Environmental Challenges to Democratic Practice. In Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, edited by Lafferty, William M. and Meadowcroft, James, 18–38. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 1995. Freedom and the Environment. Journal of Democracy 6 (3):41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Martin, Christian W.. 2003. Democracy, Government Spending, and Economic Growth: A Political-Economic Explanation of the Barro Effect. Public Choice 117 (1–2):27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA). 2006. Globe Scan Poll: Global Views on Climate Change Questionnaire and Methodology. Available at ⟨http://www.pipa.org/onlinereports/climatechange⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2004. Institutions Matter? Government and Opposition 39 (2):527–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Timmons J., Parks, Bradley C., and Vásquez, Alexis A.. 2004. Who Ratifies Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties. Global Environmental Politics 4 (3):22–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2006. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):860–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 2004. Global Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegfried, Tobias, and Bernauer, Thomas. 2007. Estimating the Performance of International Regulatory Regimes: Methodology and Empirical Application to International Water Management in the Naryn/Syr Darya Basin. Water Resources Research 43 (W11406, doi:10.1029/2006WR005738).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Learning Group. 2001. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks. Vol. 2, A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sprinz, Detlef, and Vaahtoranta, Tapani. 1994. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 48 (1):77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Nicholas Sir. 2007. Written Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change. 110th Cong., 1st sess. 13 February.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1):3–21.Google Scholar
Torras, Mariano, and Boyce, James K.. 1998. Income, Inequality, and Pollution: A Reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics 25 (2):147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, David G. 2001. The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review 99 (4):611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stein, Jana. 2008a. The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (2):243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stein, Jana. 2008b. Making Promises, Keeping Promises: Democracy, Ratification, and Compliance in International Human Rights Law. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ward, Hugh. 2008. Liberal Democracy and Sustainability. Environmental Politics 17 (3):386–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. Available at ⟨http://www.worldbank.org/data⟩. Accessed 28 January 2009.Google Scholar