Article contents
Evolving United States Relations with the Atlantic Community
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2009
Extract
Before considering evolving relations between the United States and the Atlantic Community, it is useful to examine briefly the meaning of the words “Atlantic Community,” a term that means different things to different people. It has no agreed definition because it is still a concept and not yet an institution. It purports to be geographically descriptive. However, when one considers the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which is generally regarded as the most important institutional reflection of a community of interests between the European and North American countries bordering the Atlantic basin, one finds Italy, Greece, and Turkey are members while Spain and Eire, both Atlantic countries, are absent. Similarly, if one looks at the membership of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which is another institution generally regarded as reflecting common interests of the “Atlantic Community,” one finds that all the NATO members belong as well as Eire, Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, and Spain. Although there are political reasons to account for all this confusion, at the present time the term “Atlantic Community” connotes neither an agreed geographic area nor a specific group of countries.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The IO Foundation 1963
References
1 Department of State Bulletin, 06 15, 1947 (Vol. 16, No. 415), p. 1159Google Scholar.
2 U.S., Congress, Public Law 472, Section 102(a)4 of Title I, 80th Cong., 1948; as amended by Public Law 47, 81st Cong., 1st Session, 1949, and Public Law 535, Sections 102–106 of Title I, 81st Cong., 2nd Session, 1950.
3 From an unpublished manuscript on the Atlantic Community by J. Robert Schaetzel.
4 Ely, Roland, “Economic Integration in Latin America,” reprinted from Financial Analyst Journal, 07–08 1962Google Scholar.
5 Herter, Christian A., “Atlantica,” Foreign Affairs, 01 1963 (Vol. 41, No. 2), pp. 299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by