Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:12:28.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States-A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Keith A. Smith
Keith A. Smith
Affiliation:
The author is an assistant professor of political science at Baruch College of the CithUniversity of New York
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Current Views
Information
International Organization , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1973 , pp. 563 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scheinman, Lawrence and Feld, Werner, “The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States,” International Organization, Winter 1972 (Vol. 26, No. 1), pp. 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 There is no control group against which the present sample can be compared. Therefore, conclusions based on the 36 interviews should be viewed cautiously although it appears possible to offer some general hypotheses.

3 Scheinman and Feld, p. 123.

4 Scheinman and Feld, p. 123.

5 This obviously adds up to only 25 of the sample members. Three responded by mail, thereby not allowing for follow–up questions. The other eight, while indicating no conflicts in loyalties, were not prepared to elaborate on this point.

6 Scheinman and Feld, p. 124.

7 The remaining six individuals include Sassen and Spierenburg who were government nominees; two were Euratom research scientists who were recruited by former colleagues from the Delft Technological Institute; and two cannot be explained due to the fact that their responses were by mail and could not be clarified.

8 Scheinman and Feld, p. 131.

9 This, plus one who left in 1960—also not indicated by Scheinman and Feldmdash; makes the total number of Dutch who left during the period of time surveyed nine rather than six.

10 Scheniman and Feld, p. 133.