Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:27:19.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community formation within ASEAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

H. Monte Hill
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Note
Information
International Organization , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 1978 , pp. 569 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Manila Journal, March 14–16, 1976, p. 16.

2 For examples of statements regarding regional community development in Southeast Asia, seeSolidum, Estrella D., Towards a Southeast Asian Community (Quezon City: University of Philippines Press, 1976), pp. 210–11;Manila Journal, December 5–11, 1976, p. 5;Google Scholar Asian Review, Vol. l, No. 1 (02 1976): 15Google Scholar.

3 For detailed explanations of Deutsch and Savage's approach see Deutsch, Karl W. and Savage, Richard, “A Statistical Model of the Gross Analysis of Transaction Flows,” Econometrica Vol. 28, No. 3 (07 1960): 551–72Google Scholar. In addition, one should note that there exists substantial controversy about Deutsch and Savage's model. For arguments, pro and con, see Hughes, Barry B., “Transaction Data and Analysis: In Search of Concepts,” International Organization Vol. 26, No. 4 (Autumn 1972): 659–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarChadwick, Richard N., “A Brief Critique of 'Transaction Data and Analysis: 'In Search of Concepts,” by Hughes, Barry B.,” International Organization Vol. 26, No. 4 (Autumn 1972): 681–86;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHughes, Barry B., “A Response to Chadwick, International Organization Vol. 26, No. 4 (Autumn 1976): 687–90;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Alker, Hayward Jr, and Puchala, Donald J., “Trends in Economic Partnership: The North Atlantic Area, 1928–1963,” in Singer, J. David, ed., Quantitative International Politics: Insight and Evidence (New York: Free Press, 1968), pp. 287–316Google Scholar. Brams, Steven J., “Transaction Flows in the International System,” American Political Science Review Vol. 60, No. 4 (12 1966): 880–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Myrdal, Gunnar, Asian Drama: An Inquiry into Poverty, Vol. 1 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972), p.82Google Scholar

5 Efferson, Norman, “Outlook for World Rice Productions and Trade,” in Rice, Science & Man (Los Banos, Phil.: International Rice Research Institute, 1972), p. 132.Google Scholar

6 United Nations, World Energy Supplies (New York: United Nations, ST/STAT/Ser. J./17, 1974), pp. 62–63Google ScholarPubMed.

7 Ad Hoc Committee on Tourism, 1I/ASEAN/JGS/II, Annex B. Opening address of the Minister for Communications of Indonesia at the Second Meeting at Jogjakarta, July 22, 1969, p. 2

8 Obrom, Sifribarn, A Study of the Background and Difficulties of Non-filipino Students Studying the Philippines.: Unpublished M.A. thesis, Southwestern University, 1969), pp. 12–14Google Scholar.

9 Ibid.

10 Ibid.

11 The aggregation of RA scores helps overcome one of the major problems of transactional analysis; that is, the handling of the great number of statistics such a study generates.