Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:11:22.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing relations among the government, labor, and business in Japan after the oil crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Ikuo Kume
Ikuo Kume
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Public Administration at Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

Many scholars argue that labor is excluded from Japan's political system. However, since the 1970s, labor has become considerably influential in the policymaking process in Japan. The oil crisis of 1973 and the Shuntou wage bargaining of 1975 have made labor, especially private-sector unions, modest in their wage demands, but at the same time these events have made labor participate actively in the policymaking process in order to maintain employment and seek some benefits from the government. This article demonstrates that Japan's increasing export-dependence and tradeoffs between wage increases on the one hand, and inflation and unemployment on the other in the 1970s, have driven labor to this new, more active role in policymaking, while the necessity for the governing Liberal Democratic party to seek a new constituency has enabled labor to achieve some success in this new role. This implies that Japan's political system has changed its nature since the 1970s; its political process has become more pluralistic with labor's participation within the existing political system.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1988 , pp. 659 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I am grateful to Peter Katzenstein for encouraging me to write this article. My thanks also to T. J. Pempel, J. Pontusson, M. Mabuchi, and Shoko Tanaka, whose critiques and suggestions were extremely helpful.

1. Cameron, David R., “Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labour Quiescence and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society,” in Goldthorpe, John H., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (London: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 143–78Google Scholar.

2. Ibid., p. 170. See also Katzenstein, Peter J., Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

3. Vogel, Ezra F., Japan as Number One (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

4. We can find many severe confrontations between business and labor in the 1950s and the early 1960s. Among them, the Miike coal miners' strike (1960) is the biggest one. Martin, B., “Japanese Mining Labor: The Miike Strike,” Far Eastern Survey 30, No. 2(1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Shimada, Haruo, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing: An Alternative Approach to Incomes Policy?” Journal of Industrial Relations 25 (06 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Ekonomisuto, 11 February 1976.

7. Pempel, T. J. and Tsunekawa, Keiichi, “Corporatism without Labor?” in Schmitter, C. P. and Lehmbruch, C., eds., Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation (New York: Sage, 1979)Google Scholar.

8. Muramatsu, Michio, Sengonihon no kanryousei [the post-war Japanese bureaucracies] (Tokyo: Toyokeizaishinpousha, 1982)Google Scholar , and Ohtake, Hideo, Gendai nihon no seijikenryoku keizaikenryoku ]0political and economic power in modern Japan] (Tokyo: Sanichishobo, 1979)Google Scholar . Also see Nakano, Minoru, ed., Nihongataseisakukettei no henyou [transformation of Japanese style policymaking] (Tokyo: Toyokeizaishinpousha, 1986)Google Scholar ; and Inoguchi, Takashi and Iwai, Tomoaki, Zokugiin no kenkyu [a study of LDP vested-interest parliamentary leaders] (Tokyo: Nihonkeizaishimbunsha, 1987)Google Scholar.

9. Sammuels, Richard, The Business of the Japanese Stale (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

10. Gourevitch, Peter, “Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32 (Autumn 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Kahler, Miles, Decolonization in Britain and France: The Domestic Consequences of International Relations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 14Google Scholar.

12. There is a difference between dependence and dependency, and Japan might have suffered from dependence but not dependency. Caporaso, James A., “Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis,” International Organization 32 (Winter 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and Katzenstein, Peter J., “Domestic Structures and Political Strategy: Austria in an Independent World,” in Merritt, Richard L. and Russett, Bruce M., eds., From National Development to Global Economy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981)Google Scholar.

13. Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System (New York: Academic Press, 1974)Google Scholar.

14. See Gourevitch, Peter, “The International System and Regime Formation,” Comparative Politics 10 (04 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and Skocpol, Theda, “Wallerstein's World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique,” American Journal of Sociology 82 (03 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Cameron, David R., “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis,” American Political Science Review 72 (12 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. The interdependence approach in the field of international relations shares this problem with Cameron. See Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977)Google Scholar . As for criticisms, see Kahler, , Decolonization in Britain and France, pp. 42–45Google Scholar , and Katzenstein, Peter J., “International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,” International Organization 30 (Winter 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Smith, Tony, “The Underdevelopment of Development Literature: The Case of Dependency Theory,” World Politics 31 (01 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Evans, Peter B., Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979Google Scholar

19. Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets.

20. Katzenstein, Peter J., Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

21. Gourevitch, , “Second Image Reversed,” p. 243Google Scholar.

22. Ibid.

23. Pempel, T. J., Policy and Politics in Japan: Creative Conservatism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982), p. 103Google Scholar.

24. Hyoudou, Tsutomu, Gendai no roudouundou [modern labor movements] (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1981)Google Scholar.

25. Pempel, , Policy and Politics in Japan, p. 103Google Scholar.

26. Ohta, Kaoru, Shuntou no shuuen [the end of Shuntou] (Tokyo: Chuōkeizaisha, 1975)Google Scholar.

27. In the 1980s, the steel industry's union gradually became unable to play a role of pace-setter, as a result of Japan's loss of competitive edge in the steel industry. The service-sector union is now expected to be the next pace-setter.

28. Wage increases in the small- and medium-sized companies usually exceeded those in the large companies. See Asahi nenkan, 1965–75.

29. Kobayashi, K., Roudoukeizai no kouzouhenkan [structural change in labor economy] (Tokyo: Ochanomizushobo, 1977)Google Scholar.

30. Nikkeiren was created in 1948 to recapture a managerial power that the employers had lost in the turmoil after the war and to specialize in labor management at the national level.

31. Asahi nenkan, 1973.

32. Shinkawa, Toshimitsu, “1975 nen Shuntou to keizaikikikanri [the 1975 Shuntou and economimc crisis management],” in Ohtake, Hideo, ed., Nihonseiji no souten [Issues in Japanese politics] (Tokyo: Sanichishobo, 1985)Google Scholar.

33. Two-thirds of its members were in the public sector.

34. In those days, two-thirds of the national population lived under leftist local governments.

35. Asahi nenkan, 1960–1974.

36. Shirai, Taishiro, “Japanese Labor Unions and Politics,” in Shirai, Taishiro, ed., Contemporary Industrial Relations in Japan (Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983)Google Scholar . Many Japanese political scientists argue that there are two kinds of politics in Japan: one consists of the polity members, the other of challengers to the existing system. Michio Muramatsu, Sengonihon; see also Miyake, Ichiro, Yamaguchi, Yasushi, Muramatsu, Michio, and Shindou, Eiichi, Nihonseiji no zahyou [coordination of Japanese politics[ (Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1985)Google Scholar , and Ishida, Takeshi, Gendaisosikiron [modern organization theory] (Tokyo: Iwanamishoten, 1961)Google Scholar.

37. Ekonomisuto, 7 February 1976.

38. Shimada, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing,” and Shinkawa, “1975 Shuntou.”

39. Shimada, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing.”

40. Shinkawa, “1975 Shuntou.”

41. Shimada, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing.”

42. Some leaders in the Domei and the IMF-JC seemed not to commit themselves to these wage demands so seriously. Informally, these leaders aimed at a 17% wage increase. These goals were somewhat tactical for some private-sector union leaders. See Shinkawa, “1975 Shuntou.”

43. Shimada, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing.”

44. Shinkawa, “1975 Shuntou.”

45. Shimada, “Wage Determination and Information Sharing.”

46. Zenei (Vanguard), 11 1984 (Japan Communist Party)Google Scholar.

47. Lange demonstrates the possibility that wage regulation will not result in labor's loss but in a public good for labor. Lange, P., “Unions, Workers and Wage Regulation: The Rational Bases of Consent,” in Goldthorpe, J. H., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (London; Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar . See also Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M., “The Structure of Class Conflict in Democratic Capitalist Societies,” American Political Science Review 76 (06 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48. Crouch, C., Trade Unions: The Logic of Collective Action (London: Fontanna, 1982)Google Scholar.

49. Y. Tujinaka, “Kyuchini tatu ‘roudou’ no seisakukettei [policy decision by labor in crisis],” in, Nihongataseisakukettei.

50. Inagami, Takeshi, “Roudoushasanka to shakaiseisaku [worker participation and social policy],” in Aoi, Kazuo et al. , eds., Fukushi to keikaku no shakaigaku [sociology of welfare and planning] (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigak Shuppankai, 1980)Google Scholar and Tujinaka, , “Kyuchi ni tatu ‘roudou’.” CPPU was organized in 1976Google Scholar .

51. Asahi nenkan, 1973.

52. Pempel, , Policy and Politics in Japan, p. 105Google Scholar.

53. Asahi nenkan, 1978.

54. Twelve companies agreed with their unions on postponing layoffs of 3,300 employees the textile industry until the passage of this law (Asahi shimbun, 28 November 1977).

55. Asahi nenkan and Jiji nenkan, 1978.

56. I. Nakayama, who had been a chairman of the Sanroukon, stated that, at Sanroukon meetings, members gradually became able to discuss more substantial matters. This also shows labor became involved considerably in the policy formation process (Asahi shimbun, 24 February, 1977).

57. Shinkawa, , “1975 Shuntou,” pp. 221–22Google Scholar.

58. See also Ross, George, “What is Progressive About Unions?” Theory and Society 10 (09 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59. After 1977, the Sohyo reduced wage demands, but this was because the Sohyo wanted to cooperate with the private-sector unions in Shuntou. Even after the oil crisis, unions in some service industries succeeded in gaining relatively large wage increases. In 1986, the Joint Commission of the Service-Sector Unions was set up to seek larger wage increases than those for the IMF-JC member unions.

60. For example, Mainichi shimbun, 20 November 1987.

61. The problem of whether management will reinvest profit in the domestic area has not become serious in Japan yet, partly because big business has been relatively reluctant to invest in foreign countries. But this issue may become serious, if employers become willing to invest in foreign countries in response to international trade conflicts. In Nissan Motors, the decision to set up a plant in Great Britain caused a serious conflict between its union and management in the 1980s.

62. Tujinaka, , “Kyuchi ni tatu ‘roudou’,” p. 289Google Scholar.

63. Recently, reunification of labor has become an important issue. In this process, the private-sector unions are taking the initiative, and sometimes try to weaken the public-sector unions. Adminstrative reform since 1981 has gradually weakened the power of the Sohyo by privatizing public corporations.

64. See also Tujinaka, “Kyuchi ni tatu ‘roudou1’.”

65. For example, see Ekonomisuto, 7 January 1964.

66. The economic benefits to farmers have been reduced in the late 1970s. For instance, the price of rice, which is determined by the government based on the price support policy (or the Food Control Law), had been increasing in line with the national economic growth, but since the late 1970s the price increase has sharply dropped, and LDP members have lost their eagerness to keep the price higher. Tachibana, Takashi, Noukyou [agriculture cooperatives] (Tokyo, 1980)Google Scholar , and Nikkei shimbun, Jimintou seichoukai [L'DP policy affairs council] (Tokyo: Nihonkeizaishimbunsha, 1983)Google Scholar.

67. Zenei (November 1984).

68. Tujinaka, , “Kyuchi ni tatu ‘roudou’,” pp. 291–94.Google Scholar Also see Tujinaka, Y., “Roudoukai no saihen to 86nentaisei no imi [transformation of labor and meaning of the 1986 regime],” Leviathan 1 (1987)Google Scholar.

69. Nikkei shimbun, Jimintou seichoukai.

70. Mainichi shimbun, 8 July 1986. Actually, the Teturou (Railroad Workers' Union), which had been supporting the Democratic Socialist party, supported some LDP candidates in the 1986 election. In addition, Prime Minister Nakasone claimed that the LDP's victory was a result of its inclusion of the moderate left groups in its camp, and declared that this was a starting point of the 1986 regime. In other words, he argued this election was a realigning one. Asahi shimbun, 31 August 1986. A certain part of Rengo allegedly wants to pursue policy achievements cooperating with the LDP government.

71. Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets.

72. Amin, Samir, Accumulation on a World Scale (New York: Monthly Review, 1974)Google Scholar and Evans, Dependent Development.

73. Deyo, Frederick C., ed., The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987), p. 15.Google Scholar However, there are controversies over the nature of the Korean economy similar to ones over Latin American dependent development. Barone, Charles A., “Dependency, Marxist Theory, and Salvaging the Ideas of Capitalism in South Korea,” Review of Radical Political Economics 15 (Spring 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Hart-Landsberg, Martin, “Capitalism and Third World Economic Development: A Critical Look at the South Korean ‘Miracle’,” Review of Radical Political Economics 16 (Summer 1984), pp. 181–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74. Peter Evans, “Class, State, and Dependence in East Asia: Lessons for Latin Americanists,” in Deyo, Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism; and Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 38–53Google Scholar.

75. See Gourevitch, “Second Image Reversed,” and Almond, Gabriel A., “Corporatism, Pluralism, and Professional Memory,” World Politics 35 (January 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Eulau, Heinz, The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics (New York: Random House, 1963), pp. 15–19Google Scholar.