Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:19:24.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing configurations of power in North-South Relations since 1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Tony Smith
Tony Smith
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science at Tufts University.
Get access

Extract

The demand by Third World countries for a “new international economic order” also has its political dimension. Do the threats of commodity cartels, debt defaults, and investment expropriation reflect a fundamental shift in the balance of power between North and South? This paper argues, to the contrary, that the power of the South is quite limited. An analysis of trade, financing, and investment relations between North and South reveals the latter's clearly subordinate position, which is all the more weakened by the fragile political-administrative structures of many Third World regimes. Nevertheless, the demands being made should in some form be accommodated since they serve Northern interests in two important respects: they potentially allow the North new means of leverage in relations with the South; and they offer the North the opportunity to coordinate its various policies and interests in regard to the Third World. Had the South not called for a new international economic order, the North should have pressed for one.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Winter 1977 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author would like to thank the Lehrman Institute and the German Marshall Fund of the United States for supporting this research. The paper was presented in an earlier version at the Lehrman Institute in May 1976.

1 Langer, William, “Farewell to Empire,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 1 (10 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Emerson, Rupert, “Colonialism,” The Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 4, No. 1 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 See, for example, Ranger, T.O., “Connexions Between ‘Primary Resistance’ Movements and Modern Mass Nationalism in East and Central Africa,” Journal of African History, two parts: 9: 3–4, 1968Google Scholar; and Robinson, Ronald, “Non-European Foundations for European Imperialism: Sketch for a Theory of Collaboration,” in Owen, Roger and Sutcliffe, Bob, eds., Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (Longman, 1972).Google Scholar

4 Liska, George, Imperial America: The International Politics of Primacy (Johns Hopkins Press, 1967)Google Scholar, Preface (unpaginated) and p. 180.

5 Knorr, Klaus, “The Limits of Economic and Military Power,” Daedalus (Fall 1975).Google Scholar

6 Figures for 1963: United Nations, Statistical Yearbook, 1974Google Scholar ; figures for 1972–75: United Nations, Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, 06 1976.Google Scholar

7 Speech reprinted in Petroleum, Raw Materials, and Development, Algerian Mission to the United Nations, April 1974, p. x.

8 The Charter is reprinted in the US Department of State Selected Documents 1, “The Challenge of the Third World: Seventh Special Session of the UN General Assembly, September 1–12, 1975, pp. 8ff.

9 African Development, Vol. 9, No. 4 (04 1975): 29.Google Scholar

10 Barraclough, Geoffrey, “Wealth and Power: The Politics of Food and Oil,” The New York Review of Books, 08 7, 1975.Google Scholar

11 Moynihan, Daniel P., “The United States in Opposition,” Commentary, (03 1975).Google Scholar

12 Bergsten, C. Fred, “The Response to the Third World,” Foreign Policy, Vol. 17 (Winter 1974–1975).Google Scholar

13 Zartman, I.W., “Europe and Africa: Decolonization or Dependency?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 54, No. 2 (01 1976): 326–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 340.

14 Mazrui, Ali A., “The New Interdependence,” in Erb, Guy F. and Kallab, Valeriana, eds., Beyond Dependency: The Developing World Speaks Out (Overseas Development Council, 1975), p. 39.Google Scholar

15 Tucker, Robert W., “Egalitarianism and International Politics,” Commentary, Vol. 60, No. 3 (11 1975)Google Scholar, and Tucker, in a letter to Commentary, (01 1976).Google Scholar

16 Krasner, Stephen, “Oil is the Exception,” Foreign Policy, Vol. 15 (Summer 1974)Google Scholar, Krasner, , “Trade in Raw Materials: The Benefits of Capitalist Alliance,” in Rosen, Steven J. and Kurth, James R., Testing Theories of Economic Imperialism (D.C. Heath, 1974)Google Scholar; and Mikesell, Raymond F., “More Third World Cartels Ahead?” Challenge, Vol. 17, No. 5 (11–12 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 “Trade in Primary Commodities: Conflict or Cooperation?” Tripartite Report by 15 Economists from Japan, the European Community, and the United States (The Brookings Institution, October 1974), p. 2.

18 Enders, Thomas O., “OPEC and the Industrial Countries: The Next Ten Years,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 53, No. 4 (06 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 OECD Report of December 1974, DD-403, reprinted in Howe, James W., ed., The United States and World Development: Agenda for Action 1975 (Praeger, 1975)Google Scholar, Table D-9, p. 263.

20 Ben W. Crain, “Balance-of-Payments Adjustment to Higher Oil Prices: Managing the Petrodollar Problem.” Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Domestic and International Monetary Effect of Energy and Other Natural Resource Pricing of the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, December 1974.

21 Gosovic, Branislav and Ruggie, John Gerard, “On the Creation of a New International Economic Order: Issue Linkage and the Seventh Special Session of the UN General Assembly,” International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Spring 1976): 318.Google Scholar

22 Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, June 1976.

23 Ibid.

24 United Nations, World Trade Annual, 1973, I–200.Google Scholar

25 Calculated from Ibid.

26 Rothschild, Emma, “Food Politics,” Foreign Affairs (01 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 World Bank, Annual Report, 1975, p. 6; United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Industrial Development Survey (hereafter Survey), Special Issue, 1974, p. 29.

28 OECD, Economic Outlook, 12 1975, p.64Google Scholar, Table 29 (figure after official aid).

29 OECD, Development Cooperation, 11 1975, p. 37.Google Scholar

30 World Bank, Annual Report, 1975, p. 6.Google Scholar

31 OECD, Economic Outlook, 12 1975Google Scholar, Table 30, p. 65 (apparently gross figures before amortization).

32 Rothschild, Emma, “Banks: The Coming Crisis,” The New York Review of Books, 05 27, 1976.Google Scholar

33 Rothschild, Emma, “Banks: The Politics of Debt,” The New York Review of Books, 06 24, 1976.Google Scholar

34 The New York Times, May 17, 1976, p. 44.

35 Rothschild, May 27, 1976.

36 Business Week, April 26, 1976 (see also May 31, 1976).

37 Schlesinger, James R., “Strategic Leverage from Aid and Trade,” in David Abshire and Richard Allen, National Security: Political, Military, and Economic Strategy in the Decade Ahead (Praeger, 1963), p. 693.Google Scholar

38 Mikesell, Raymond, Foreign Investment in the Petroleum and Mineral Industries (Johns Hopkins, 1971), p. 428Google Scholar; Vernon, Raymond, Restrictive Business Practices: The Operations of United States Enterprises in Developing Countries: Their Role in Trade and Development (UNCTAD, 1972) Table 9, p. 14.Google Scholar

39 Moran, Theodore H. (with Fred Bergsten, C. and Horst, Thomas), U.S. Direct Investment Abroad and American Foreign Policy (Brookings, forthcoming 1976) Chapter 11, manuscript.Google Scholar

40 Wilkie, James W., Statistics and National Policy (University of California, Los Angeles, 1974), p. 253.Google Scholar

41 Department of Commerce, Survey of Current Business, May 1974Google Scholar, Table 2, p. 30; and October 1975, Table 11, p. 50.

42 Ibid.

43 The international oil cartel is apparently now working out a “special arrangement” with OPEC. See Adelman, M.A., “Oil-Import Quota Auctions,” Challenge, Vol. 18, No. 6 (01–02 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Weinstein, Franklin B., “Multinational Corporations and the Third World: The Case of Japan and Southeast Asia,” International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 3 (Summer 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 UNIDO, Survey, Volume 1 (1969), p. 6Google Scholar; Vernon, Table 9, p. 14.

46 UNIDO, Survey, Volume 5 (1973), p. 86Google Scholar; and Survey, Special Issue, p. 185.

47 Cross calculation of Tables 1 and 18, UNIDO, Survey, Volume 5, pp. 5 and 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Hansen, Roger, “A ‘New International Economic Order?’ An Outline for a Constructive U.S. Response,” Overseas Development Council, Development Paper 19 (07 1975).Google Scholar

49 See Riggs, Fred W., Administrative Reform and Political Responsiveness (Sage, 1970)Google Scholar, and Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies (Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

50 Schmitter, Philippe C., Military Rule in Latin America: Function, Consequences and Perspectives (Sage, 1973)Google Scholar, Introduction; and Alain Rouquié, “Military Revolutions and National Independence in Latin America, 1968–1971,” in Schmitter. See also Horowitz, Irving Louis and Trimberger, Ellen Kay, “State Power and Military Nationalism in Latin America,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 8, No. 2 (01 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Peemans, J.P., “The Social and Economic Development of Zaire Since Independence: An Historical Outline,” African Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 5 (04 1975): 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52 See my “The Political and Economic Ambitions of Algerian Land Reform, 1962–1974,” The Middle East Journal (Summer 1975).Google Scholar

53 Adelman, lrma and Morris, Cynthia Taft, Economic Growth and Social Equity (Stanford University Press, 1973), p. 192 (and see pp. 178ff).Google Scholar

54 “Covert Action in Chile, 1963–1973,” Staff Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate, (US Government Printing Office, 1975).Google Scholar

55 Cited in Hansen, Roger D., “The ‘Crisis of Interdependence’: Where Do We Go From Here?” in Hansen, Roger D. ed., The U.S. and World Development: Agenda for Action 1976 (Praeger, 1976), p. 42.Google Scholar

56 Fanon, Frantz, The Wretched of the Earth (Grove Press, 1966), p. 76.Google Scholar

57 UN, UNCTAD Second Session, New Delhi, Volume 1, Report and Annexes (TD/97), p. 431.Google Scholar

58 UN, UNCTAD Third Session, Santiago de Chile, Volume 1.Google Scholar

59 UN, Proceedings of the UNCTAD, Volume 2Google Scholar; Policy Statements, 1964, pp. 76ff.Google Scholar

60 Hirschman, Albert, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (University of California Press, 1969), p. 36.Google Scholar

61 Graham, Richard, Britain and the Onset of Modernization in Brazil, 1850–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1968), pp. 73, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 See, among others, Issawi, Charles, ed., The Economic History of the Middle East 1800–1914 (University of Chicago Press, 1966)Google Scholar; and on India, Baran, Paul, The Political Economy of Growth (Monthly Review, 1957).Google Scholar

63 UNIDO, Survey, pp. 9–10Google Scholar, 14, 16, 88.

64 Johnson, Harry G., “The Efficiency and Welfare Implications of the International Corporation,” in Kindleberger, Charles P. ed., The International Corporation (M.I.T. Press, 1970).Google Scholar

65 Moore, Barrington Jr, Reflections on the Causes of Human Misery and Upon Certain Proposals to Eliminate Them (Beacon, 1970), pp. 114–15.Google Scholar

66 It is confusion over this issue–as well as many other empirical matters–which mars Charles Beitz's attempt to apply John Rawls' A Theory of Justice to North-South relations: Beitz, Charles R., “Justice and International Relations,” Philosophy and Public Affairs (Summer 1975)Google Scholar. By contrast, see Tucker, fn. 15.

67 Chenerey, Hollis, et al., Redistribution with Growth (Oxford University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; and Adelman and Morris.

68 Petras, James, Politics and Social Structure in Latin America (Monthly Review, 1970)Google Scholar, Part III, Section 3.

69 Myrdal, Gunnar, The Challenge of World Poverty: A World Anti-Poverty Program in Outline (Pantheon, 1970), pp. 362–63Google Scholar, 372.

70 On Latin America, see Griffin, Keith, The Political Economy of Agrarian Change (Harvard University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; and Feder, Ernest, The Rape of the Peasantry: Latin America's Landholding System (Anchor, 1971)Google Scholar, Part III. On India, see Myrdal's account of his longer, earlier study in Ibid., Chapters 3 and 4.

71 Schlesinger, p. 687.

72 For an extended discussion of this analysis see my “North-South Issues Within the Structure of the OECD,” Lehrman Institute, unpublished paper.