War — Prisoners of War — Status of — Person Captured by Enemy Forces and Convicted of War Crimes Committed Before Capture — Whether Prisoner of War in Technical Sense — Interpretation of German “Law on Returning Citizens” of January 24, 1956.

War — In General — Non-Hostile Relations between Belligerents — Armistices — The Korean Conflict — Effect of Armistice as Terminating War — When War Terminated for Purposes of United States Military Law.

War — Termination of — By Cessation of Hostilities Under an Armistice — The Korean Conflict — When War Terminated for Purposes of United States Military Law.

War — Effects of Outbreak of — On Enemy Subjects — Their Personal Status — Persona Standi in Judicio — Restoration of — At Termination of War — Termination of Power to Seize Enemy Property — By Unilateral Action — The Law of the United States of America.

War — Effects of Outbreak of — Trading with the Enemy — Termination of Power to Seize Enemy Property — By Unilateral Action — At Termination of War — Right of Alien to Sue — Restoration of Right — The Law of the United States of America.

War — Termination of — Right of Alien to Sue — Restoration of Right — Termination of Power to Seize Enemy Property — By Unilateral Action — The Law of the United States of America.

War — Termination of — Factual Cessation of Hostilities — Absence of Formal Treaty of Peace — Termination of Second World War as Between Holland and Germany.

Belligerent Occupation — Judicial Functions of Occupant — Validity of Sentence of Court Set Up by Occupant — Occupation During War in Violation of General Treaty for the Renunciation of War, 1928 — Judgment of International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg — War Against and Occupation of Poland in 1939 — Whether Occupation in Legal Sense of Term — Official Acts of German Reich and Its Functionaries in Occupied Poland — Whether Permitted by Hague Regulations of 1907.

Belligerent Occupation — Judicial Functions of Occupant — Power of Occupant to Hear Appeals from Judgments Delivered before Occupation — Officer of Occupying Forces Deciding Appeal in Absence of Civil Courts — Articles 23 [h] and 43 of the Hague Regulations, 1907 — The Law of Sarawak.

War — Effects of Outbreak of — Trading with the Enemy — Authority Given to Agent Before Outbreak of War — Principal and Agent Resident in Different Territories, Both Occupied by Same Enemy — Whether Authority of Agent Determined by War.

Belligerent Occupation — Administrative Functions of Occupant — Liquidation of Banks — Settlement of Pre-occupation Debts in Accordance with Regulations of Occupant — Transactions Effected by Agent in Occupied Territory, the Principal being in Another, Unoccupied, Territory — Authority Given to Agent Before Outbreak of War — Territory in which Principal Residing Subsequently Occupied by Same Belligerent — Whether Agent’s Authority Determined — The Law of Sarawak

State Responsibility — Claims — In General — Agreement to Guarantee Against Claims of Private Persons — Agreement of Sale Between Belligerent Occupant and Government of Occupied Territory — The Law of the United States of America.

Belligerent Occupation — Act of Government of Occupied State — Whether Authorized by Occupying State — Sale of Surplus Property By One State to the Other — Agreement to Guarantee against Claims of Private Persons — The Law of the United States of America

Belligerent Occupation — Joint Occupation — Occupation of Japan After Second World War — Responsibility of United States for Act of Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers in Japan — Legislative and Administrative Functions of Occupant — Act of Government of Occupied Territory Performed at Direction of Occupant — Retention of Seized Property by Government of Occupied Territory at Direction of Occupant — Whether Attributable to Occupant

Belligerent Occupation — Legislative Measures of Occupant — Racial Persecution by German Occupation Authorities in Holland — Anti-Jewish Legislation — Wrongful Application in Holland — Non-Recognition and Correction After the War

Occupied Territory — Administrative and Legislative Measures of Occupant — Illegal Annexation of Occupied Territory — Law Introduced by Occupant in Contravention of Articles 43 and 46 of Hague Regulations of 1907 — Legislation Depriving Inhabitants of Right to Dispose of Property — Testamentary Dispositions

Belligerent Occupation — Legislative Functions of Occupant — Legislation Affecting Private Property — Whether Lawful — Article 43 of Hague Regulations of 1907 — Invasion and Occupation in Contravention of General Treaty for Renunciation of War, 1928 — Whether State Committing Such Invasion Entitled to Rights of a Belligerent Occupant — Law in Force in Territory Thus Invaded — Contracts of Sale of Immovable Property During Occupation — Impossibility of Compliance with Requirement of Form of Notarial Act — Validity of Such Contracts

Occupied Territory — Administrative and Legislative Measures of Occupant — Illegal Annexation of Occupied Territory — New Legal System Introduced by Occupant in Contravention of Articles 43 and 46 of Hague Regulations of 1907 — German Occupation of Poland During Second World War — Sequestration and Confiscation of Property — German Notaries Public in Occupied Territory — Measures Altering Law as to Private Property — Validity of Wills Made in Disregard of Such Measures

Belligerent Occupation — Administrative Functions of Occupant — Apointment of Notaries Public in Occupied Territory — Appointment of German Notaries Public in Occupied Poland — Whether Notaries According to Polish Law — Validity of Acts Performed by German Notaries Public in Occupied Poland — Relevant Polish Post-Occupation Law — Validity of Contracts and Wills Made before German Notaries — Conditions of Validity

Belligerent Occupation — Legislative and Administrative Functions of Occupant — Effect of Occupation on Non-Political Laws of Occupied Territory — Status of Internal Revenue Laws During Occupation

Belligerent Occupation — Respect for Private Property — Seizure of War Material by Belligerent — Payment of Inadequate Compensation — Whether Seizure an Act of Requisition or Pillage — Claim by Former Owner to Full Compensation — Liability of Owner’s Home State — The Law of France

Belligerent Occupation — Respect for Private Property — Requisition of — Subsequent Sale of Property — Whether Purchaser Acquires Title — The Law of Sarawak

Belligerent Occupation — Respect for Private Property — Contract Induced by Duress or Undue Influence — Whether Purchaser Acquires Title — The Law of Sarawak

War — Belligerent Forces — Irregular Forces — Status of — Non-Observance of Article 1 of Hague Regulations — Hostile Acts Against Occupant — Reprisals by Occupant — Whether Victims of Reprisals Entitled to Damages from Irregular Forces Responsible for Hostile Acts against Occupant.

Belligerent Occupation — Treatment of Civilian Population — Irregular Forces Committing Acts of Belligerency against Occupant — Reprisals by Occupant — Whether Victims of Reprisals Entitled to Damages from Irregular Forces Responsible for Acts of Belligerency against Occupant — “Ardeatine Massacre” in Rome in March 1944

War — Law of Prize — Seizure of Private Property by Belligerent — Property Not Used by Belligerent — Sale of Part of Property to Third Party — Seizure Declared Unlawful by Prize Court — Repayment of Purchase Price by Belligerent — Purchase Price Handed by Third Party to Original Owner — Claim by Original Owner against Third Party for Full Value and Loss of Profit — The Law of France