Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:30:59.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Merits)

International Court of Justice.  16 March 2001 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Territory — Sovereignty — Whether Qatar or Bahrain having sovereignty over Zubarah — Relevance of conventions — 1868 Agreement — Unratified Anglo-Ottoman Convention, 1913, Article 11 — Anglo-Ottoman Treaty, 1914, Article III — Whether Bahrain in position to engage in direct acts of authority — Whether Sheikh of Qatar having authority to tax Naim tribe in 1937 — Whether Great Britain regarding Zubarah as belonging to Bahrain

Territory — Sovereignty — Whether Qatar or Bahrain having sovereignty over Hawar Islands — Nature of 1939 British decision — Legal effect — Whether constituting arbitral award — Whether Court having jurisdiction to decide dispute on 1939 British decision — Whether British Government having jurisdiction to decide Hawar Islands question — Validity of 1939 British decision — Whether binding on Parties

Territory — Sovereignty — Whether Qatar or Bahrain having sovereignty over Janan Island including Hadd Janan — Effects of 1939 British decision — Whether Janan Island part of Hawar Islands — 1936, 1937, 1938 and 1946 lists submitted by Bahrain to British Government — 1947 letters from British Government to Rulers of Qatar and Bahrain — Relevance

Sea — Maritime delimitation — Parties requesting Court to draw single maritime boundary in accordance with international law — Applicable law — Customary international law — Delimitation of territorial seas of Parties — Article 15 of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 — Drawing of provisional equidistance line — Relevant baselines — Relevant coasts — Sovereignty over islands — Relevance of low-tide elevations — Applicable rules for determination of baselines — Equidistance/special circumstances rule — Whether any special circumstances making adjustment of provisional equidistance line necessary — Delimitation of continental shelves and exclusive economic zones of Parties — Applicable law — Drawing of provisional equidistance line — Equitable principles/relevant circumstances rule — Whether any circumstances making adjustment of provisional equidistance line necessary — Course of single maritime boundary

Keywords

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)