Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:25:00.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner (No. 2)

European Court of Human Rights.  28 February 1979 ; 27 October 1983 ; 02 August 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Treaties — Treaty not incorporated into English law — Whether capable of conferring rights upon individuals enforceable in an English court — European Convention on Human Rights, 1951 — Right to privacy — Telephone tapping — The law of the England

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — Operation and enforcement — Necessity for municipal legislation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether justiciable in municipal court — Whether relevant in determining common law — The law of England

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction of Chamber — Whether to relinquish in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Telephone tapping authorized by warrant of senior minister — Whether unlawful — Right to respect for private life — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 8 — Whether justiciable in municipal court — Whether relevant in determining common law — General right of privacy — Right of privacy and property in respect of telephone conversations — Whether recognized by English law — Domestic remedy for telephone tapping — European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction of Chamber — Whether to relinquish in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raising serious questions affecting interpretation of Convention — Whether alleged activities an interference by public authority with a right guaranteed by the Convention — Whether justified — Article 8(2) of the Convention — Whether in accordance with the law — Quality of the law — Accessibility and foreseeability — Legal protection against arbitrary use of discretion — Scope and manner of exercise — Whether to be indicated in law — Whether interference necessary in a democratic society — Practice of metering of telephone lines — Whether applicant potentially liable to be affected — Legal safeguards — Effective remedy before national authority for violation of Convention — Article 13 — Whether necessary to examine issue — Just satisfaction — Article 50 — The law of England — The European Convention on Human Rights

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)