Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:26:27.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ottoman and Secular Civil Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Dora Glidewell Nadolski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term “secularization” is used to qualify that manner of change which occurred in the Islamic system of civil law from 1451 to 1926. It refers to the processes that caused gradual revision and/or change in Islamic Ottoman and Turkish civil law and connotes a departure from the orthodox tenets prescribed by Islamic law. This departure is a process that may create gradual or abrupt change. Also that which in retrospect is classified as a change may not at the outset be classified as such. Specifically, this change may begin in the form of supplementation and continue in this manner without the process taking the form of major change. On the other hand there may be total change within the structure undergoing these experiences. This structure, which is the subject of discussion, is the Islamic Ottoman and Turkish civil law. The secularization process in this case represents: (1) supplementation, (2) reform (Tanzimat and the Mecelle), (3) change (abrogation of the capitulatory system), (4) complete secular change in civil law (adoption of the Swiss Civil Code).

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 517 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

al-Din, H. M. Diya, Dustur, Medjelle-i Ahkam-i Adliye Sharhi. Der-i Se'adet, 1311.Google Scholar
Akgün, Ismail, Turk Medeni Kanûnu. Istanbul: Matbaaçilik ve Kitapçilik Müesseseleri, 1967.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Edward, La Turquie et le Tanzimat. Paris: 1882.Google Scholar
Kaynar, Reşat, Mustafa Reşit Paşa ve Tanzimat. Ankara: 1954.Google Scholar
özoggˇuz, Nejat, Temyiz Mahkemesi. Ankara: Akay Kitapevi, 1944. (This work describes the general characteristics of the Turkish Court of Cassation, its history, development, organization, powers responsibilities and appeal procedures).Google Scholar
Young, George, Corps de Droit Ottoman. Oxford at Clarendon Press, 1906.Google Scholar
Özoggˇuz, Abdülkaˇdir, “Görev Uzusmazliklari ve Uyusmazlik Mahkemesi,” Idare Dergisi, V. CLXXXI (07–08, 1946). (This article traces the evolution of the system for determining jurisdictional disputes in France and Turkey and describes the creation of the Turkish court of conflict.)Google Scholar
Ardahan, Vedat, “Adalet Teskilatimiz,” Istanbul Barosu Dergisi (01 1952). (This article describes the organization of courts and gives suggestions for their reorganization.)Google Scholar
Ansay, Tugrul, American-Turkish Private International Law. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Balta, Tahsin Bekir, Organization and Functions of the Central Government of Turkey. Ankara: Iş Matbaacilik ve Ticaret, 1965.Google Scholar
Berkes, Niyazi, The Development of Secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Jasper Yeates, The Mixed Courts of Egypt. New York: Yale Press, 1930; second edition, 1968.Google Scholar
Frey, Frederick, The Turkish Political Elite, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Golzuklu, Feyyaz, The Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure. New Jersey: Rothman and Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Gurelli, Nevzat, The Turkish Criminal Code. New Jersey: Rothman and Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Karlen, Delmar, and Arsel, Ilhan, Civil Litigation in Turkey. Ankara: Ajans-Turk Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal, Turkey's Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal, editor, Political and Social Thought in the Contemporary Middle East. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1968.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid, and Liebesney, Herbert, editors, Law in the Middle East. Washington: The Middle East Institute, 1955.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard, The Emergence of Modern Turkey. London: 1961.Google Scholar
Lybyer, Albert, The Government of the Ottoman Empire in the Time of Suleiman the Magnificent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardin, şerif, The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought. Princeton: 1962.Google Scholar
Ostrorog, Count Leon, The Angora Reform. London: London Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph, Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: 1964.Google Scholar
Süsa, Nasim, The Historical Interpretation of the Origin of the Capitulations in the Ottoman Empire. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Williams, Ivy, The Swiss Civil Code. Oxford: 1925.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, Farhat, trans., Mahmassani, S.Falsafat Al-Tashri Fi Al-Islam. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961.Google Scholar
Brinton, Jasper, “Turkey's New System of Laws and Courts,” Current History, 25 (01, 1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Phillip M., “The Treaty of Lausanne,” American Journal of International Law, 17, 18, 21 (04, 1923, 01, 1924, 07, 1927).Google Scholar
Findikogˇlu, K. M., “Causes of the Reception,” International Social Science Bulletin, 9 (1957).Google Scholar
Lipstein, K. & others, “Reception of Foreign Law in Turkey,” Internatiottal Social Science Bulletin, 9 (1957).Google Scholar
Lybyer, Albert, “Turkey Walks Abreast with the Modern World,” Current History, 24 (07, 1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Lucius, “Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire,” American Journal of International Law, 17 (1923).Google Scholar
Turlington, Edgar, “The Settlement of Lausanne,” American Journal of International Law, 18 (10, 1924).Google Scholar
Ülken, H. Z., “The New Civil Code and the Traditional Customary Law,” International Social Science Bulletin, 9 (1957).Google Scholar
Velidedeog¯lu, H. V., “The Reception of the Swiss Civil Code in Turkey,” International Social Science Bulletin, 9 (1957).Google Scholar