Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:19.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Riding or killing the centaur? Reflections on the identities of legal anthropology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2008

Franz von Benda-Beckmann
Franz von Benda-Beckmann*
Affiliation:
Professor, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article examines how the academic genre called the ‘anthropology of law’ or ‘legal anthropology’ developed under the disciplinary constraints of both the social and legal sciences. It first discusses its historical development and different trajectories and engages in a comparative analysis of similarities and differences between anthropologists, lawyers and sociologists of law. Finally, by looking at the ways in which cognitive and normative categories such as ‘legal anthropology’ are reproduced and changed through time, the article in itself is a legal anthropological exercise. The author concludes that there are hardly any identity markers left that would demarcate legal anthropology in a mutually exclusive way from other (sub)disciplines. The distinctiveness of legal anthropology rather lies in an accumulation of features, which make (legal) anthropology what it is, even if many features may be shared with other disciplines.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 85 - 110
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, R. L. (1978) ‘From the Editor’, Law and Society Review 12: 489–497.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1990) ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’ in Featherstone, M. (ed.) Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity. Special Issue of Theory, Culture & Society. London: Sage, 295–301.Google Scholar
Bachofen, J. J. (1861/1948). Das Mutterrecht. [Two volumes.] Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bader, K. S. (1976) ‘Rechtliche Volkskunde aus der Sicht des Juristen und Rechtshistorikers’, in Köstlin, K. and Sievers, K. D. (eds) Das Recht der kleinen Leute. Beiträge zur rechtlichen Volkskunde. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1–11.Google Scholar
Banakar, R. (2003) Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies in Sociolegal Research. Glienicke and Madison: Galda and Wilch.Google Scholar
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (eds) (2002) An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Barth, F., Gingrich, A., Parkin, R. and Silverman, S. (2005) One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology. The Halle lectures. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (1979) Property in Social Continuity: Continuity and Change in the Maintenance of Property Relationships Through Time in Minangkabau, West Sumatra. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (1989) ‘From the Law of Primitive Man to the Sociolegal Study of Complex Societies. Antropologi Indonesia 8: 67–75.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (1991) ‘Unterwerfung oder Distanz: Rechtssoziologie, Rechtsanthropologie und Rechtspluralismus aus rechtsanthropologischer Sicht.’ Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 12: 97–119.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (1997) ‘Citizens, Strangers and Indigenous Peoples: Conceptual Politics and Legal Pluralism’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Hoekema, A. (eds) Natural Resources, Environment and Legal Pluralism. Yearbook Law & Anthropology 9. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1–42.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (1999) ‘Multiple Legal Constructions of Socio-economic Spaces: Resource Management and Conflict in the Central Moluccas’ in Rösler, M. and Wendl, T. (eds) Frontiers and Borderlands: Anthropological Perspectives. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Wien: Lang, 131–158.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (2001) ‘On the Reproduction of Law: Micro and Macro in the Time-space Geography of Law’ in Fikentscher, W. (ed.) Begegnung und Konflikt – eine kulturanthropologische Bestandsaufnahme. München: C. H. Beck Verlag, 119–131.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von (2002) ‘Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism 47: 37–82.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (1985) ‘Transformation and Change in Minangkabau’ in Thomas, L. L. and von Benda-Beckmann, F. (eds) Change and Continuity in Minangkabau. Monographs in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series Number 71. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, 235–278.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (1991) ‘Law in Society: From Blindman’s-bluff to Multilocal Law’ in von Benda-Beckmann, K., von Benda-Beckmann, F. and Spiertz, H. L. J. (eds) Living Law in the Low Countries. Special Issue of Recht der Werkelijkheid 1991/1. Amsterdam: Vuga, 119–139.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (1998) ‘Where Structures Merge: State and Off-state Involvement in Rural Social Security on Ambon, Eastern Indonesia’ in Pannell, S. and von Benda-Beckmann, F. (eds) Old World Places, New World Problems: Exploring Resource Management Issues in Eastern Indonesia. Canberra: The Australian National University, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, CRES Publications, 143–180.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (2002) ‘Anthropology of Law and the Study of Folk Law in The Netherlands after 1950’ in Vermeulen, H. and Kommers, J. (eds) Tales from Academia. History of Anthropology in The Netherlands. Part 2. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik Saarbrücken GmbH, 695–731.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (2005) ‘Democracy in Flux: Time, Mobility and Sedentarization of Law in Minangkabau, Indonesia’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Griffiths, A. (eds) Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate, 111–130.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (2006) ‘The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F. and von Benda-Beckmann, K. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. Nrs 53–54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 1–44.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Benda-beckmann, K. von (2007) ‘Transnationalisation of Law, Globalisation and Legal Pluralism: A Legal Anthropological Perspective’ in Antons, C. and Gessner, V. (eds) Globalisation and Resistance: Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing, 53–80.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, F. von and Griffiths, A. (eds) (2005) Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, K. von (1981) ‘Forum Shopping and Shopping Forums: Dispute Processing in a Minangkabau Village’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 117–159.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, K. von (1984) The Broken Stairways to Consensus: Village Justice and State Courts in Minangkabau. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. Vol. 106. Dordrecht, Leiden, Cinnaminson: Foris Publications, KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, K. von (2001) ‘Transnational Dimensions of Legal Pluralism’ in Fikentscher, W. (ed.) Begegnung und Konflikt – eine kulturanthropologische Bestandsaufnahme. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, C. H. Beck Verlag, 33–48.Google Scholar
Benda-beckmann, K. von and Strijbosch, F. (eds) (1986) Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands. Essays on Legal Pluralism. Vol. 116. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. Dordrecht, Leiden: Foris Publications, KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. (1973) The Social Reality of Religion. Harmondsworth: Penguin University Books.Google Scholar
Beyer, J. (2006) ‘Revitalisation, Invention and Continued Existence of the Kyrgyz Aksakal Courts: Listening to Pluralistic Accounts of History’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F. and von Benda-Beckmann, K. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Nrs. 53-54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 141–176.Google Scholar
Blomley, N. K. (1994) Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Blomley, N. K. (1998) ‘Landscapes of property’, Law & Society Review 32: 567–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1957) Justice and Judgement among the Tiv of Nigeria. London, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1969) ‘Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology’ in Nader, L. (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine, 401–418.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2002) ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field, in Mundy, M. (ed.) Law and Anthropology. Aldershot: Ashgate, Dartmouth, 109–157.Google Scholar
Bryde, B.-O. (2000) ‘Juristensoziologie’ in Dreier, H. (ed.) Rechtssoziologie am Ende des 20 Jahrhunderts. Gedächtnissymposion für Edgar Michael Wenz. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 137–155.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. P. and Wiles, P. (1976) ‘Law in Society in Britain’, Law & Society Review 10: 547–578.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. P. and Wiles, P. (eds) (1979) Law and Society: Readings in the Sociology of Law. Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1997) ‘Spatial Practices: Fieldwork, Travel and the Disciplining of Anthropology’ in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 185–222.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (2005) ‘Rearticulating Anthropology’ in Segal, D. A. and Yanagisako, S. J. (eds) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle. Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. F. (1997) ‘The Waxing and Waning of “subfields” in North American Sociocultural Anthropology’ in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 117–130.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. L. and Comaroff, J. (forthcoming) ‘Reflections on the Anthropology of Law, Governance, and Sovereignty’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Eckert, J. (eds) Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. L. and Roberts, S. A. (1977) ‘The Invocation of Norms in Dispute Settlement: The Tswana Case’ in Hamnett, I. (ed.) Social Anthropology of Law. A. S. A. Monograph 14. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press, 77–112.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. L. and Roberts, S. A. (1981) Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cotterell, R. (1995) Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, J. K., Dembour, M.-B. and Wilson, R. A. (2001) Culture and Rights. Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darian-smith, E. (1999) Bridging Divides: the Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity in the New Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darian-smith, E. (ed.) (2007) Ethnography and Law. The International Library of Essays in Law and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Darian-smith, E. and Fitzpatrick, P. (eds) (1999) Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. (2002) Global Prescriptions. The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, J. M. and Anderson Iii, E. E. (2003) Anthropology & Law. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. and Vernicos, G. (eds) (2006) La quete anthropologique du droit. Autour de la démarche d’Etienne Le Roy. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (2006) ‘From Subjects to Citizens: Legalism from Below and the Homogenisation of the Legal Sphere’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F. and von Benda-Beckmann, K. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Nrs. 53–54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 45–75.Google Scholar
Erlanger, H. S. (2005) Organizations, Institutions, and the Study of Shmuel: Reflections on the 40th anniversary of the Law and Society Association. Law and Society Review 39: 1–9.Google Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983) Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fallers, L. A. (1969) Law without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fikentscher, W. (1980) ‘Synepëik und eine synepëische Definition des Rechts’ in Fikentscher, W., Franke, H. and Köhler, O. (eds) Entstehung und Wandel rechtlicher Traditionen. Freiburg-München: Karl Alber, 53–120.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. (1980) Law and State in Papua New Guinea. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. (1983) ‘Law, Plurality and Underdevelopment’ in Sugarman, D. (ed.) Legality, Ideology and the State. London: Academic Press, 159–182.Google Scholar
Fuest, V. (2006) ‘Ethnologie in der Arena. Ein akteursanalytischer Blick in Umweltforschungsprobleme’, Sociologus 56: 37–67.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. (1994) ‘Legal Anthropology, Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought’, Anthropology Today 10: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1995) ‘Disciplines’ in Geertz, C. (ed.) After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 96–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessner, V. (2002) ‘Rechtspluralismus und globale soziale Bewegungen’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 2: 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) ‘Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48: 781–795.Google Scholar
Gingrich, A. (2005) ‘The German-speaking Countries, in Barth, F., Gingrich, A., Parkin, R. and Silverman, S. (eds) One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology. The Halle Lectures. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 61–153.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1955) The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1969) ‘Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law’ in Nader, L. (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine, 349–373.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1972) The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence (2nd edn). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, W. (1966) Comparative Functionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (1997) In the Shadow of Marriage: Gender and Justice in an African Community. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (2002) ‘Legal Pluralism’ in Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (eds) An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oregon: Hart Publishing, 289–310.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. (1986a) ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. (1986b) ‘Recent Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands and its Historical Background’ in von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Strijbosch, F. (eds) Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands. Dordrecht, Berlin: Foris Publications, Walter de Gruyter, 11–66.Google Scholar
Günther, K. and Randeria, S. (2001) Recht, Kultur und Gesellschaft im Prozess der Globalisierung. Bad Homburg: Werner Reimers Stiftung.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997) ‘Discipline and Practice: “The Field’ as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology, in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–46.Google Scholar
Held, D., Mcgrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hirschon, R. (1984) ‘Introduction: Property, Power and Gender Relations’ in Hirschon, R. (ed.) Women and Property – Women as Property. London, Canberra, New York: Croom Helm, St. Martin’s Press, 1–22.Google Scholar
Hoebel, E. A. (1954) The Law of Primitive Man. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holder, J. and Harrison, C. (eds) (2003) Law and Geography. Vol. 5. Current Legal Issues 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. (1952) Shona Customary Law: With Reference to Kinship, Marriage, the Family and the Estate. Cape Town: Oxford University Press/Cumberlege.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. (1973) ‘Trouble-cases and Trouble-less Cases in the Study of Customary Law and Legal Reform’, Law & Society Review 7: 585–609.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. (1978) ‘Disparities and Uncertainties in African Law and Judicial Authority: A Rhodesian Case Study. African Law Studies 17: 1–35.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1978) The Sociological Movement in Law. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1993) Explorations in Law and Society. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, P. (1992) Review Essay. History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law. Law & Society Review 26: 373–411.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2006) Law, Violence and Sovereignty Among West Bank Palestinians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Köstlin, K. (1976) ‘Die Verrechtlichung der Volkskultur’ in Köstlin, K. and Sievers, K. D. (eds) Das Recht der kleinen Leute. Beiträge zur rechtlichen Volkskunde. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 109–124.Google Scholar
Kottak, C. P. (2000) Anthropology: The Exploration of Human Diversity (8th edn). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. (1997) ‘After Ishmael: The Fieldwork Tradition and its Future’ in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 47–65.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2005) ‘Alternative Histories of British Social Anthropology.’ Social Anthropology 13: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubscher, M. (1998) ‘Religionsethnologie’ in Fischer, H. (ed.) Ethnologie. Einführung und Überblick (4th edn). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 221–243.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K. and Hoebel, E. A. (1941). The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (2nd edn). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Maine, Sir H. (1861/1894) Ancient law. London: John MurrayGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. (1992) ‘Past, Present and Emergent Identities: Requirements for Ethnographies of Late Twentieth-century Modernity Worldwide’ in Lash, S. and Friedman, J. (eds) Modernity and Identity. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell, 309–330.Google Scholar
Mather, L. (2003) ‘Reflections on the Reach of Law (and Society) Post 9/11: An American Superhero?’ Law & Society Review 37: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1988) ‘Legal Pluralism’, Law & Society Review 22: 869–896.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1992) ‘Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes’, Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1997) ‘Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture: The Ka Ho’okolokolonui Kanaka Maoli Tribunal’ in Wilson, R. A. (ed.) Human Rights, Culture and Context. London: Pluto Press, 28–48.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (2006) ‘Anthropology and International Law’, Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 99–116.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1970) ‘Law and Anthropology’ in Siegel, B. (ed.) Biennial Review of Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 259–293.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1973) ‘Law and Social Change: The Semi-autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study’, Law & Society Review 7: 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1978a) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1978b) ‘Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’s Interpretation of Barotse Law’ in Gulliver, P. H. (ed.) Cross-examinations: Essays in Memory of Max Gluckman. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1986) Social Facts and Fabrications: ‘Customary’ Law on Kilimanjaro 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1989) ‘History and the Redefinition of Custom on Kilimanjaro’ in Starr, J. and Collier, J. F. (eds) History and Power in the Study of Law. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 227–301.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (1993) ‘The Ethnography of the Present and the Analysis of Process’, Recht der Werkelijkheid 2: 117–134.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (2001) ‘Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 95–116.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. (ed.) (2005) Law and Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Mundy, M. (ed.) (2002) Law and Anthropology. Ashgate: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Munger, F. (1998) ‘Mapping Law and Society’ in Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V. and Lawrence, S. (eds) Crossing Boundaries – Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 21–80.Google Scholar
Nader, L. (1965) ‘The Anthropological Study of Law’, American Anthropologist 67: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, L. (1969) ‘Introduction’ in Nader, L. (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine, 1–11.Google Scholar
Nader, L. (2002) The Life of the Law. Anthropological Projects. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, L. (2005) ‘The Americanization of International Law’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Griffiths, A. (eds) Mobile People, Mobile Law. Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate, 199–213.Google Scholar
Nader, L. and Todd, H. F. (eds) (1978) The Disputing Process – Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, L. and Yngvesson, B. (1973) ‘On Studying the Ethnography of Law and its Consequences’ in Honigman, J. J. (ed.) Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 883–921.Google Scholar
Nelken, D. and Feest, J. (eds) (2001) Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford, Portland: Hart.Google Scholar
Newman, K. S. (1983) Law and Economic Organization. A Comparative Study of Preindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1978) ‘Law as an Intellectual Stepchild’ in Johnson, H. M. (ed.) Social Systems and Legal Process. San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 11–58.Google Scholar
Passaro, J. (1997) ‘“You Can’t Take the Subway to the Field!” Village Epistemologies in the Global Village’ in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 147–162.Google Scholar
Peleikis, A. (2006) ‘Whose Heritage? Legal Pluralism and the Politics of the Past. A Case Study from the Curonian Spit (Lithuania)’ in Benda-Beckmann, F. v. and Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Nrs. 53–54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 209–237.Google Scholar
Pirie, F. (2006a) ‘Legal Complexity on the Tibetan Plateau’ in Benda-Beckmann, F. v. and Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Nrs. 53–54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 77–99.Google Scholar
Pirie, F. (2006b) ‘Legal Autonomy as Political Engagement: The Ladakhi Village in the Wider World’, Law & Society Review 40: 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, F. (2007) Peace and Conflict in Ladakh. The Construction of a Fragile Web of Order. Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospisil, L. (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pottage, A. and Mundy, M. (eds) (2004) Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social Making Persons and Things. Cambridge studies in law and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raiser, T. (1998) ‘Die Entstehung der Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie’ in Brand, J. and Strempel, D. (eds) Soziologie des Rechts. Festschrift für Erhard Blankenburg zum 60. Geburtstag. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 11–18.Google Scholar
Restrepo, E. and Escobar, A. (2005) ‘Other Anthropologies and Anthropology Otherwise. Steps to a World Anthropologies Framework’, Critique of Anthropology 25: 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, A. (2001) The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riles, A. (1994/2002) ‘Representing In-between: Law, Anthropology and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity’ in Mundy, M. (ed.) Law and Anthropology. Ashgate: Dartmouth, 27–80.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (1979) Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (1998) ‘Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 42: 95–106.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (1998) The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islam. Lewis Henry Morgan lecture series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (2006) Law as Culture: An Invitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rouland, N. (1994) Legal Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Sage, C. M. and Woolcock, M. (eds) (2006) The World Bank Legal Review, volume 2 – Law, Equity and Development. Washington: The World Bank and Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, R. (1970) ‘Die Funktionen des Rechts in primitiven Gesellschaften’ in Lauthmann, R., Maihofer, W. and Schelsky, H. (eds) Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, Bd. 1). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag, 108–174.Google Scholar
Schott, R. (1982) ‘Main Trends in German Ethnological Jurisprudence and Legal Ethnology’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 20: 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, R. (1998) ‘Rechtsethnologie’ in Fischer, H. (ed.) Ethnologie. Einführung und Überblick, 4th edn. Berlin: Reimer, 171–195.Google Scholar
Schulz-schäffer, I. (2004) ‘Rechtsdogmatik als Gegenstand der Rechtssoziologie’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 25: 141–174.Google Scholar
Segal, D. A. and Yanagisako, S. J. (eds) (2005) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle. Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, S. (2005) ‘The United States’ in Barth, F., Gingrich, A., Parkin, R. and Silverman, S. (eds) One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology. The Halle Lectures. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 257–347.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2005) ‘Languages/Cultures are Dead! Long Live the Linguistic–Cultural!’ in Segal, D. A. and Yanagisako, S. J. (eds) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle. Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 99–125.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. G. (1980) ‘Law and Development in the Light of Dependency Theory’, Law & Society Review 14: 723–804.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. G. (1981) ‘Colonialism and Legal Form: The Creation of “Customary Law” in Senegal’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 49–90.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. G. (1993) Law and Anthropology: A Review. European University Institute Working paper Law No. 93/4.Google Scholar
Stewart, I. (1981) ‘Sociology in Jurisprudence: The problem of “Law” as Object of Knowledge’ in Fryer, B., Hunt, A., McBarnet, D. and Moorhouse, B. (eds) Law, State and Society. London: Croom Helm, 107–135.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1993) ‘The Folly of the “Social Scientific” Concept of Legal Pluralism’, Journal of Law & Society 20: 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter haar, B. (1929) ‘Western Influence on the Law for the Native Population’ in Schrieke, B. (ed.) The Effect of Western Influences on Native Civilisations in the Malay Archipelago. Weltevreden: K. Kolff & Co, 158–170.Google Scholar
Ter haar, B. (1937) Het adatprivaatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië in wetenschap, practijk en onderwijs. Groningen, Batavia: Wolters’ Uitgevers-Maatschappij N.V.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (ed.) (1997) Global Law Without a State. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Thelen, T. (2006) ‘Law and Mutual Assistance in Families: A Comparison of Socialist Legacies in Hungary and Eastern Germany’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F. and von Benda-Beckmann, K. (eds) Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Special Double Issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Nrs. 53–54/2006. Berlin: Lit, 177–207.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (2006) ‘Competing Global Players in Rural Morocco: Upgrading Legal Arenas’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 53–54, 101–139.Google Scholar
Van vollenhoven, C. (1909) Miskenningen van het adatrecht. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wastell, S. (2006) Kingship and Custom: Law, Knowledge and Sovereignty in an African Polity. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Wastell, S. (2008) The Mouth That Tells No Lies: Kingship, Law, and Sovereignty in Swaziland. Seattle: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Weilenmann, M. (1996) Burundi: Konflikt und Rechtskonflikt – Eine rechtsethnologische Studie zur Konfliktregelung der Gerichte. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Weilenmann, M. (2005) ‘Project Law – Normative Orders of Bilateral Development Cooperation and Social Change: A Case Study from the German Agency for Technical Cooperation’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Griffiths, A. (eds) Mobile People, Mobile Law. Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate, 233–255.Google Scholar
Wesel, U. (1985) Frühformen des Rechts in vorstaatlichen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. (1982) ‘The Establishment and Structure of Science as Reputational Organizations’ in Elias, N., Martins, H. and Whitley, R. (eds) Scientific Establishment and Hierarchies. Dordrecht, London, Boston: Reidel, 313–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiber, M. G. (1993) Politics, Property and Law in the Philippine Uplands. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfried Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Wiber, M. G. (2005) ‘Mobile Law and Globalism: Epistemic Communities Versus Community Based Innovation in the Fisheries Sector’ in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Griffiths, A. (eds) Mobile People, Mobile Law. Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate, 131–151.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1997) ‘Human Rights, Culture and Context: An Introduction’ in Wilson, R. A. (ed.) Human Rights, Culture & Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London, Chicago: Pluto Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Wrase, M. (2006) ‘Rechtssoziologie und law and society – Die deutsche Rechtssoziologie zwischen Krise und Neuaufbruch’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 27: 289–312.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J. (2005) ‘Flexible Disciplinarity: Beyond the Americanist Tradition’ in Segal, D. A. and Yanagisako, S. J. (eds) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle. Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 78–98.Google Scholar
Zahle, H. (1995) ‘The Polycentricity of the Law or the Importance of Legal Pluralism for Legal Dogmatics’ in Petersen, H. and Zahle, H. (eds) Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 185–199.Google Scholar