Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T06:22:47.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reformers' unfulfilled promises: accountability deficits in Argentinean criminal courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

Pablo Ciocchini
Pablo Ciocchini*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool in Singapore, 529763, Singapore. E-mail: [email protected].
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, following the transition to democratic rule in Latin America, criminal courts all over the continent have been going through a process of continuous reform. Reformers introduced an adversarial-based procedural system, arguing that it would guarantee due process and greater transparency and accountability. However, in recent years, the emphasis of this reformist narrative has changed from expanding defendants' rights towards improving the efficacy of the system. This paper explores how the original principles of transparency and accountability have been upheld in criminal courts in one of the first areas of jurisdiction to implement those changes: the Province of Buenos Aires. Based on an analysis of data from forty-five in-depth interviews with key informants and court observations, this paper explores how the reforms developed a managerial rationality in criminal courts that may undermine the due process in Latin American jurisdictions that have undergone similar democratic reform processes.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 22 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I am especially grateful to Dr Dave Whyte for his comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

References

Bastard, Benoit, Delvaux, David, Mouhanna, Christian and Schoenaers, Frédéric (2016) Justice ou précipitation: l'accélération du temps dans les tribunaux. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar
Baytelman, Andrés and Duce, Mauricio (2003) Evaluación de la reforma procesal penal: estado de una reforma en marcha. Santiago: CEJA.Google Scholar
Bergman, Marcelo and Langer, Máximo (2015) ‘El nuevo código procesal penal nacional acusatorio: aportes empíricos para la discusión en base a la experiencia en la Provincia de Buenos Aires’, Revista de derecho procesal penal 1: 51–80.Google Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos (2016) ‘Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up: Accuracy and Fairness without Trials as Backstops’, Faculty Scholarship. Available at: <http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1644> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Binder, Alberto M. (1997) Política criminal: de la formulación a la praxis. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Binder, Alberto M. (2002) ‘Los oficios del jurista: la fragmentación de la profesión jurídica y la uniformidad de la carrera judicial’, Sistemas judiciales 1: 34–53.Google Scholar
Cafferata Nores, José (1989) ‘Legalidad y oportunidad; criterios y formas de selección’ in Symposium internacional sobre la transformación de la justicia penal en la República Argentina. Buenos Aires: Presidencia de la Nación Argentina, 21–28.Google Scholar
Casal, Matías Eugenio y otro s/ robo simple en grado de tentativa (2005) Supreme Court of Argentina, Case 1681 (Fallos, 328:3399), 20 September 2005.Google Scholar
Cheng, Kevin K.-Y. (2014) ‘The Practice and Justifications of Plea Bargaining by Hong Kong Criminal Defence Lawyers’, Asian Journal of Law and Society 1: 395–412.Google Scholar
Ciocchini, Pablo (2014) ‘Campaigning to Eradicate Court Delay: Power Shifts and New Governance in Criminal Justice’, Crime, Law and Social Change 61: 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, Álvaro E. (2010) ‘El nuevo diseño de la casación penal’, Revista electrónica Derecho Penal Online. Available at: <http://derechopenalonline.com/el-nuevo-diseno-de-la-casacion-penal/> (accessed 24 November 2017).+(accessed+24+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Cruz, José M. (2015) ‘Police Misconduct and Political Legitimacy in Central America’, Journal of Latin American Studies 47: 251–283.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan (1991) Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Hartford: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Lázzari, Eduardo (1997) ‘El ministerio público fiscal y la reforma procesal’ in Díaz, Carlos Chiara (ed.) Código procesal penal de la Provincia de Buenos Aires comentado. Buenos Aires: Rubinzal, 55–74.Google Scholar
Dervan, Lucian E. (2011) ‘Overcriminalization 2.0: The Symbiotic Relationship between Plea Bargaining and Overcriminalization’, Journal of Law, Economics and Policy 7: 645–655.Google Scholar
Duce, Mauricio (2009) ‘Reforma de la justicia penal en América Latina: Una perspectiva panorámica y comparada, examinando su desarrollo, contenidos y desafíos’, UDP Public Policy Series – Working Papers 3: 1–39.Google Scholar
Duce, Mauricio and Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio (2001) ‘Seguridad, ciudadanía y reforma de la justicia penal en América Latina’, Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado XXXIV: 755–787.Google Scholar
Duce, Mauricio, Fuentes, Claudio and Riego, Cristián (2009) ‘La reforma procesal penal en América Latina y su impacto en el uso de la prisión preventiva’ in Riego, Cristián and Duce, Mauricio (eds) Prisión preventiva y reforma procesal penal en América Latina. Santiago: CEJA, 13–72.Google Scholar
Eser, Albin (1996) ‘The Acceleration of Criminal Proceedings and the Rights of the Accused: Comparative Observations as to the Reform of Criminal Procedure in Europe’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3: 341–370.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm (1997) ‘Legal Complexity and the Transformation of the Criminal Process: The Origins of Plea Bargaining’, Israel Law Review 31: 183–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fondevila, Gustavo, Langer, Máximo, Bergman, Marcelo, Vialta, Carlos and Mejía, Alberto (2016) ¿Cómo se juzga en el Estado de México? Una radiografía de la operación del sistema de justicia penal acusatorio. Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
Ganón, Gabriel (2008) ‘¿La “macdonalización” del sistema de justicia criminal? La aceptación improvisada de los paquetes de reforma judicial para el tercer milenio’ in Bergalli, Roberto, Beiras, Iñaki Rivera and Bombini, Gabriel (eds) Violencia y Sistema Penal. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto, 237–265.Google Scholar
Glanc, Laura (2014) ‘Caught between Soldiers and Police Officers: Police Violence in Contemporary Argentina’, Policing and Society 24: 479–496.Google Scholar
Grande, Elisabetta (2000) ‘Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance’, American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 227–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammergren, Linn (2008) ‘Twenty-Five Years of Latin American Judicial Reforms: Achievements, Disappointments, and Emerging Issues’, Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 9: 89–104.Google Scholar
Hazán, Luciano (2004) ‘Entrevista a Roberto Berizonce: “La oralidad no es para jueces cómodos, sino al revés”’, Sistemas judiciales 7: 8–16.Google Scholar
Hazán, Luciano and Iud, Alan (2010) ‘Informe de evaluación del proceso de fortalecimiento del sistema acusatorio en la Provincia de Buenos Aires – plan de flagrancia’ in Primer encuentro nacional Redex Argentina. Córdoba: Advocatus, 161–235.Google Scholar
Hazán, Luciano and Riego, Cristián (2007) ‘La oralidad en las etapas previas al juicio: la experiencia de Mar del Plata’ in Riego, Cristián (ed.) Reformas procesales en América Latina: Resultados del proyecto de seguimiento, IV Etapa. Santiago: CEJA, 255–294.Google Scholar
Herrera Ulloa V Costa Rica (2004) Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs, IACHR 3, IACHR Series C No 107, IHRL 1490 (IACHR 2004), 2 July 2004.Google Scholar
Hinton, Mercedes S. (2005) ‘A Distant Reality: Democratic Policing in Argentina and Brazil’, Criminal Justice 5: 75–100.Google Scholar
Indec (2010) ‘Cuadro P1-P. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Población total y variación intercensal absoluta y relativa por partido: Años 2001–2010’. Available at: <http://www.indec.gov.ar/ftp/censos/2010/CuadrosDefinitivos/P1-P_Buenos_Aires.pdf> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2013) ‘American Criminal Procedure in a European Context’, Cardozo Journal of International Comparative Law 21: 409–459.Google Scholar
Langbein, John (1978) ‘Torture and Plea Bargaining’, Faculty Scholarship Series. Available at: <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/543> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Langbein, John (1992) ‘On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15: 119–127.Google Scholar
Langer, Máximo (2004) ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure’, Harvard International Law Journal 45: 1–64.Google Scholar
Langer, Máximo (2006) ‘Rethinking Plea Bargaining: Practice and Reform of Prosecutorial Adjudication in U.S. Criminal Procedure’, American Journal of Criminal Law 33: 223–299.Google Scholar
Langer, Máximo (2007) ‘Revolution in Latin American Criminal Procedure: Diffusion of Legal Ideas from the Periphery’, American Journal of Comparative Law 55: 617–676.Google Scholar
Maier, Julio B.J. (1993) ‘Democracia y administración de justicia penal en Iberoamérica: los proyectos para la reforma del sistema penal’ in Reformas procesales en América Latina: La oralidad en los procesos. Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria.Google Scholar
Malik, Waleed H. (2007) Judiciary-Led Reforms in Singapore: Framework, Strategies, and Lessons. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn (1979) Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal-Case Disposition. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Mauri, Carolina, Rossi, Ivana and Soria, Patricia (2013) ‘Informe sobre la reforma procesal penal en Córdoba’, Revista Pensamiento Penal. Available at: <http://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina35448.pdf> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Mccoy, Candance (2005) ‘Plea Bargaining as Coercion: The Trial Penalty and Plea Bargaining Reform’, Criminal Law Quarterly 50: 67–107.Google Scholar
McLeod, Allegra M. (2010) ‘Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice’, Yale Law & Policy Review 29: 83–164.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, Aogan (1994) ‘The Justifications of “Justice”: Legal Practitioners’ Accounts of Negotiated Case Settlements in Magistrates’ Courts’, British Journal of Criminology 34: 411–430.Google Scholar
Palmieri, Gustavo, Martínez, María J., Litvachky, Paula, Aliverti, Ana and Hazán, Luciano (2004) Informe sobre el sistema de justicia penal en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: CELS.Google Scholar
Preliminary recitals law no. 11,922 (n.d.) Available at: <http://www.gob.gba.gov.ar/legislacion/legislacion/f-11922.html> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
PRELIMINARY RECITALS LAW NO. 13,183 (n.d.) Available at: <http://www.gob.gba.gov.ar/legislacion/legislacion/f-13183.html> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Procuración General (2015) ‘Fuero criminal y correccional: IPP iniciadas por departamento judicial año 2015’. Available at: <https:// www.mpba.gov.ar/files/content/IPP%20Totales%202015.pdf> (accessed 6 November 2017).+(accessed+6+November+2017).>Google Scholar
Redex (2010) ‘Presentación red de capacitadores en reforma judicial Redex Argentina’ in Primer Encuentro Nacional Redex Argentina. Córdoba: Advocatus, 11–14.Google Scholar
Riego, Cristián (2002) ‘Informe comparativo: proyecto seguimiento de los procesos de reforma judicial en América Latina’, Sistemas judiciales 2: 12–58.Google Scholar
Riego, Cristián and Santalices Ariztía, Fernando (2003) ‘Seguimiento de los procesos de reforma judicial en América Latina: Segundo informe comparativo’, Sistemas judiciales 3: 34–78.Google Scholar
Roach Anleu, Sharyn and Mack, Kathy (2001) ‘Pleading Guilty and Professional Relations in Australia’, The Justice System Journal 22: 155–184.Google Scholar
San Martin Castro, César (1998) ‘La reforma del proceso penal peruano’, Revista Peruana de Derecho Procesal 2: 227–257.Google Scholar
Tiede, Lydia B. (2012) ‘Chile's Criminal Law Reform: Enhancing Defendants’ Rights and Citizen Security’, Latin American Politics and Society 54: 65–93.Google Scholar
Vargas Viancos, Juan E. (2003) ‘Eficiencia en la justicia’, Sistemas judiciales 3: 68–92.Google Scholar
Weigend, Thomas (2006) ‘Why Have a Trial When You Can Have a Bargain?’ in Duff, Antony, Farmer, Lindsay, Marshall, Sandra and Tadros, Victor (eds) The Trial on Trial: Volume 2: Judgement and Calling to Account. Oxford: Hart, 207–222.Google Scholar