Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:14:59.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The controversy of compassion as an awakening to our conflicted social condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2017

Iain Wilkinson
Iain Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Reader in Sociology, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of law and emotion is now established as a distinct field of study in its own right. In this respect, legal studies has shared in a wider ‘affective turn’ that has involved twenty-first-century social science in a new concern to explain the contribution of emotional feelings to human thought, motivation and behaviour. This development has been accompanied by a pronounced debate over how emotion should be rendered accountable within a rational frame of analysis. On the one hand, it is possible to portray this as being sustained by a movement to make us more emotionally literate and more sensitive to the ways people act and think through feeling. On the other hand, it might be interpreted as being rooted in a concern to make matters of emotion more amenable to rational discipline and the sanction of reason. In this paper, I contend that, where a focus is brought to the experience of ‘compassion’, the volume is raised on these conflicts of interpretation. I further argue that opposing and contested points of view on the experience and value of ‘compassion’ provide us with valuable insights into the wider dynamics of social and cultural change that have inspired the ‘affective turn’. These arguments are developed with reference to the social theories of Max Weber and Norbert Elias. Moreover, in taking note of Hannah Arendt's thinking on the cultural politics of compassion, I attend not so much to how the controversy of compassion might be resolved, but rather to its potential to awaken critical humanitarian concern. Compassion is hereby celebrated as an inherently ‘unstable emotion’ that brings debate to the condition and bounds of human care and social justice.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 13 , Special Issue 2: Law and Compassion , June 2017 , pp. 212 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, K. (2005) ‘Legal Feminism and the Emotions: Three Moments in an Evolving Relationship’, Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 28: 325–344.Google Scholar
Abrams, K. (2008) ‘Barriers and Boundaries: Exploring Emotion in the Law of the Family’, Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 16(2): 301–321.Google Scholar
Abrams, K. and Keren, H. (2009) ‘Who's Afraid of Law and the Emotions’, Minnesota Law Review 94: 1997–2074.Google Scholar
Amable, B. (2011) ‘Morals and Politics in the Ideology of Neo-Liberalism’, Socio-Economic Review 9(1): 3–30.Google Scholar
Amato, J.A. (1990) Victims and Values: A History and a Theory of Suffering. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1963) ‘The Social Question’, in Arendt, H. and Schell, J. (eds) On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 49–105.Google Scholar
Baker, K.K. (2005) ‘Gender and Emotion in Criminal Law’, Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 28: 447–466.Google Scholar
Bandes, S.A. and Blumenthal, J.A. (2012) ‘Emotion and the Law’, Annual Review of Law & Social Science 8: 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (ed.) (2004) Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R.J. (1986) ‘Rethinking the Social and the Political’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 11(1): 111–130.Google Scholar
Biehl, J., Good, B. and Kleinman, A. (2007) ‘Introduction: Rethinking Subjectivity’, in Biehl, J., Good, B. and Kleinman, A. (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (1999) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1978) ‘The Contradictions of Hannah Arendt's Political Thought’, Political Theory 6(1): 5–26.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1994) Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. (2013) The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2001) States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Coombs, W.T. (1999) ‘Information and Compassion in Crisis Responses: A Test of Their Effects’, Journal of Public Relations Research 11(2): 125–142.Google Scholar
Crane, G.D. (1996) ‘Dangerous Sentiments: Sympathy, Rights, and Revolution in Stowe's Antislavery Novels’, Nineteenth-Century Literature 51(2): 176–204.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R. (2000) The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R. (2008) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Das, V. (1997) ‘Sufferings, Theodicies, Disciplinary Practices, Appropriations’, International Journal of Social Science 49: 563–557.Google Scholar
Decety, J. (2011) ‘Dissecting the Neural Mechanisms Mediating Empathy’, Emotion Review 3(1): 92–108.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2007) ‘Cosmopolitan Nationalism to Cosmopolitan Democracy’, Review of International Studies 33(4): 675–692.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1994) The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991 [1975]) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G. (1995) ‘Why Care? The Trouble with Social Rights’, Cardozo Law Review 17(4–5): 1365–1390.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1990) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, Social Text (25/26): 56–80.Google Scholar
Goodenough, O.R. and Tucker, M. (2010) ‘Law and Cognitive Neuroscience’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 61–92.Google Scholar
Halttunen, K. (1995) ‘Humanitarianism and the Pornography of Pain in Anglo-American Culture’, American Historical Review 100(2): 303–334.Google Scholar
Henderson, L.N. (1987) ‘Legality and Empathy’, Michigan Law Review 85(7): 1574–1653.Google Scholar
Höijer, B. (2004) ‘The Discourse of Global Compassion: The Audience and Media Reporting of Human Suffering’, Media, Culture & Society 26(4): 513–531.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (2007) Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Hyvönen, A.E. (2014) ‘Tentative Lessons of Experience Arendt, Essayism, and “The Social” Reconsidered’, Political Theory 42(5): 569–589.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1985) ‘Is Nothing Sacred? The Ethics of Television’, Daedalus 114(4): 57–78.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1974) ‘Medical Nemesis’, The Lancet 303(7863): 918–921.Google Scholar
James, C.G. (2013) ‘Seeing Things as We Are: Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education’, International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 8: 123–150.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1984) ‘Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Capitalism’, New Left Review, 146(July–August): 53–92.Google Scholar
Kahan, D.M. and Nussbaum, M.C. (1996) ‘Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law’, Columbia Law Review 96(2): 269–374.Google Scholar
Kaus, M. (1999) ‘Compassion, the Political Liability’, New York Times, 25 June. Available at: <http://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/25/opinion/compassion-the-political-liability.html> (accessed 7 March 2017).+(accessed+7+March+2017).>Google Scholar
Khare, R.S. (1990) ‘The Bhopal Tragedy: Labyrinthine Law and Unending Politics’, Anthropology Today 6(6): 12–14.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1998) The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (2007) ‘Distant Suffering and Cosmopolitan Obligations’, International Politics, 44(1): 19–36.Google Scholar
Madeira, J.L. (2012) ‘Woman Scorned: Resurrecting Infertile Women's Decision-Making Autonomy’, Maryland Law Review 71(2): 339–410.Google Scholar
Maroney, T.A. and Gross, J.J. (2014) ‘The Ideal of the Dispassionate Judge: An Emotion Regulation Perspective’, Emotion Review 6(2), 142–151.Google Scholar
Moeller, S.D. (1999) Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J.E. (2008) ‘Incorporating Emotional Intelligence Concepts into Legal Education: Strengthening the Professionalism of Law Students’, University of Toledo Law Review 39(2): 323–352.Google Scholar
Moore, B. Jr (1972) Reflections on the Causes of Human Misery and upon Certain Proposals to Eliminate Them. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R.F. (2000) ‘Law and Emotion, Love and Hate’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 11: 747–784.Google Scholar
Nash, K. (2003) ‘Cosmopolitan Political Community: Why Does It Feel so Right?’, Constellations 10(4): 506–518.Google Scholar
Nash, K. (2008) ‘Global Citizenship as Show Business: The Cultural Politics of Make Poverty History’, Media, Culture and Society 30(2): 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (1996a) ‘Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion’, Social Philosophy and Policy 13(1): 27–58.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (1996b) ‘Emotion in the Language of Judging’, St John's Law Review 70: 23–30.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998) Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1966) ‘Introduction’, in Weber, M. (ed.) The Sociology of Religion. London: Methuen, xix–lxvii.Google Scholar
Pickering, W.S. and Rosati, M. (eds) (2013) Suffering and Evil: The Durkheimian Legacy. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. (2009) The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rozario, K. (2003) ‘“Delicious Horrors”: Mass Culture, the Red Cross, and the Appeal of Modern American Humanitarianism’, American Quarterly 55(3): 417–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S. (2002) ‘Crimes of Bhopal and the Global Campaign for Justice’, Social Justice 29(3): 47–52.Google Scholar
Singer, T. and Lamm, C. (2009) ‘The Social Neuroscience of Empathy’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156(1): 81–96.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2006 [1759]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Sorisio, C. (2000) ‘The Spectacle of the Body: Torture in the Antislavery Writing of Lydia Maria Child and Frances E. W. Harper’, Modern Language Studies 30(1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Tenbruck, F. (1980) ‘The Problem of the Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber’, British Journal of Sociology 31(3): 316–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, K. (2001) Compassion, Morality, and the Media. Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
Turner, B.S. (1992) Max Weber: From History to Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1948) ‘Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions’, in Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C.W. (eds) From Max Weber. London: Routledge, 323–359.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1975) Max Weber: A Biography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I. (2005) Suffering: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I. (2013) ‘The Provocation of the Humanitarian Social Imaginary’, Visual Communication 12(3): 261–276.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I. and Kleinman, A. (2016) A Passion for Society: How We Think about Human Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.A. and Brown, R.D. (2009) Humanitarianism and Suffering: The Mobilization of Empathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, S.S. (1983) ‘Hannah Arendt: Democracy and the Political’, Salmagundi 60: 3–19.Google Scholar
Woodward, K. (2002) ‘Calculating Compassion’, Indiana Law Journal 77(2): 223–245.Google Scholar