Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:39:07.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CRPD and transformative equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2017

Tina Minkowitz
Tina Minkowitz*
Affiliation:
President, Center for the Human Rights of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry. E-mail: [email protected].
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This reflection responds primarily to the papers on legal agency and state intervention, with brief comments on the two other papers. The concept of transformative equality, developed in jurisprudence under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), can promote a deeper understanding of the rights of persons with disabilities.1 In particular, it is useful to address power relations between disabled and non-disabled persons not only with respect to family members and medical professionals, but also in the institutions of law and the state.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 13 , Special Issue 1: Legal Capacity and Human Rights , March 2017 , pp. 77 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna and Flynn, Eilionóir (2017) ‘The Right to Legal Agency: Domination, Disability, and the Protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1): 22–38.Google Scholar
Beaupert, Fleur and Steele, Linda (2014) ‘Submission to United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Draft General Comment on Article 12 – Equal Recognition Before the Law’. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CRPD/GC/BeaupertSteele_Art.12.doc (accessed 14 December 2016).Google Scholar
Brosnan, Liz and Flynn, Eilionóir (2017) ‘Freedom to Negotiate: A Proposal Extricating “Capacity” From “Consent”’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1): 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bhailís, Clíona and Flynn, Eilionóir (2017) ‘Recognising Legal Capacity: Commentary & Analysis of Article 12 CRPD’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1): 6–21.Google Scholar
Dhanda, Amita (2007) ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34: 429.Google Scholar
Flynn, Eilionóir and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna (2017) ‘State Intervention in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The Case for a Disability Neutral Framework’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1): 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1994) ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’, Constellations 1: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, Gina (2012) The Law on the Use of Force: A Feminist Analysis. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holtmaat, Rikki (2013) ‘The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women's Equality and Freedom’ in Hellumm, Anne and Aasen, Henriette Sinding (eds) Women's Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95–123.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Maths (n.d.) ‘Information about Personligt Ombud in English and other languages’. Available at: http://po-skane.org/in-foreign-languages/ (accessed 13 December 2016).Google Scholar
Mazelis, Ruta (2008) ‘Self-Injury: Understanding and Responding to People Who Live with Self-Inflicted Violence’, Sidran Institute/RutaMazelis, Trauma Services for Women, National Center for Trauma Informed Care, 22 February 2008. Available at: http://www.theannainstitute.org/Self%20Injury.pdf (accessed 13 December 2016).Google Scholar
Minkowitz, Tina (2010) ‘CRPD Advocacy by the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry’. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2326668 (accessed 14 December 2016).Google Scholar
Minkowitz, Tina (2016a) ‘Reflections on the Human Rights Committee's Draft General Comment on Article 6 from a Gender Perspective and a Disability Perspective’. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/31008953/Reflections_on_the_Human_Rights_Committees_draft_General_Comment_on_Article_6_from_a_Gender_Perspective_and_a_Disability_Perspective (accessed 20 January 2017).Google Scholar
Minkowitz, Tina (2016b) ‘The Reception of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the United States (New York), Mexico, and Peru’. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2902629 (accessed 20 January 2017).Google Scholar
Minkowitz, Tina (unpublished LL.M. thesis) ‘Female Autonomy vs Gender Identity: A Critical Analysis in CEDAW Jurisprudence and the Yogyakarta Principles’.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roex, Karlijn (2016) ‘The Contested Freedom of the Scary’. Available at: https://absoluteprohibition.wordpress.com/2016/03/24/the-contested-freedom-of-the-scary-karlijn-roex/ (accessed 14 December 2016).Google Scholar
Romany, Celina (1993) ‘Women as Aliens: A Feminist Critique of the Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law’, Harvard Law School Human Rights Journal 6: 87.Google Scholar