Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:10:58.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human expunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

Robert Klee*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA

Abstract

Thomas Nagel in ‘The Absurd’ (Nagel 1971) mentions the future expunction of the human species as a ‘metaphor’ for our ability to see our lives from the outside, which he claims is one source of our sense of life's absurdity. I argue that the future expunction (not to be confused with extinction) of everything human – indeed of everything biological in a terran sense – is not a mere metaphor but a physical certainty under the laws of nature. The causal processes by which human expunction will take place are presented in some empirical detail, so that philosophers cannot dismiss it as merely speculative. I also argue that appeals to anthropic principles or to forms of mystical cosmology are of no plausible avail in the face of human expunction under the laws of physics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrow, J., Tipler, F. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
Caldeira, K., Kasting, J. (1992). The life span of the biosphere revisited. Nature 360, 721723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, B. (1974). Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology. In Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data, ed. Longair, M.S., pp. 291298. Dordrecht, Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, I. (1990). Interstellar travel: a review for astronomers. Q. J. R. Astron. Soc. 30, 377400.Google Scholar
Dyson, F. (1968). Physics Today 21, 4145.Google Scholar
Franck, S., Kossacki, K., Bounama, C. (1999). Modelling the global carbon cycle for the past and future evolution of the earth system. Chem. Geol. 159, 305317.Google Scholar
Kaler, J. (1993). Giants in the sky: the fate of the Sun. Mercury (Mar-Apr.), 3441.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1971). The absurd. J. Phil. 68, 716727.Google Scholar
Rybicki, K., Denis, C. (2001). On the final destiny of the earth and the solar system. Icarus 151, 130137.Google Scholar
VS (1977a). voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/greetings.html (accessed 29 September 2016).Google Scholar
VS (1977b). voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/sounds.html (accessed 29 September 2016).Google Scholar
VS (1977c). voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/music.html (accessed 29 September 2016).Google Scholar
VS (1977d). voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/scenes.html (accessed 29 September 2016).Google Scholar
VS (1977e). voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/goldenrec.html (accessed 29 September 2016). The Sagan quote is near the bottom of the second paragraph.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations, Rev.4th Ed. trans. By Anscombe, G.E.M., Hacker, P.M.S. & Schulte, J., p. 104e. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zubrin, R., McKay, C. (1996). Technological requirements for terraforming Mars. In Islands in the Sky: Bold New Ideas for Colonizing Space, ed. Schmidt, S. & Zubrin, R., pp. 125146. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar