No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2012
1 Prosecutor v Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Case No IT-94-1-AR72, Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995.
2 See more in detail T Hoffmann, ‘The Gentle Humanizer of Humanitarian Law—Antonio Cassese and the Creation of the Customary Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’ in L vd Herik and C Stahn (eds), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (TMC Asser 2010) 58–80.
3 See inter alia Paulus, A and Vashakmadze, M, ‘Asymmetrical War and the Notion of Armed Conflict—A Tentative Reconceptualization’ 91 (2009) International Review of the Red Cross 95–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kress, C., ‘Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflicts’ 15 (2010) Journal of Conflict and Security Law 245–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T Hoffmann, ‘Squaring the Circle?—International Humanitarian Law and Transnational Armed Conflicts’ in M Matheson and D Momtaz (eds), Rules and Institutions of International Humanitarian Law Put to the Test of Recent Armed Conflicts (Martinus Nijhoff 2010) 217–274.
4 See S Sivakumaran, ‘Identifying an Armed Conflict Not of an International Character’ in C Stahn and G Sluiter (eds), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2009) 374.