Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  4. Volume 11
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 11 - October 1990

Contents

Page 1 of 11

Departments

Letters to the Editor

Departments

  • Clostridium difficile Associated Diarrhea

  • S. Brooks, R. Real, M. Kramer, M. Adachi
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, p. 574
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Editorial

  • Zeroing in on the Appropriate Management of Occupational Exposures to HIV-1

  • David K. Henderson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 175-177
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Departments

Letters to the Editor

Departments

Departments

Special Commentary

Special Sections

  • Contributions of Epidemiology to Quality Assessment and Monitoring

  • Avedis Donabedian
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 117-125

  • The contribution of epidemiology to quality assessment and monitoring: a clear enough subject. But as I approached it, it slipped into ambiguity and confusion. What was quality assessment? What was monitoring? For that matter, what was quality? And the meaning of epidemiology was the deepest mystery of all.

    I must begin by defining my terms. Quality shall be taken to mean making a judgment on the goodness of healthcare, based on one or more of the following: the expected or realized ability of the care to achieve the greatest improvement in health that the current science and technology of healthcare can achieve; acceptability to patients (including their families); and acceptability to the community (or the society at large). There are three ways in which we can find out if healthcare has been good in these respects. First is the examination of the process of care, which I take to mean the degree to which what is done for and by patients corresponds to what is known or believed to be most effective in improving health, and most acceptable to patients and to society. Second is the examination of the outcomes of care, meaning the degree to which the care provided is acceptable and has attained achievable improvements in health. Third is the examination of structural attributes, meaning the degree to which the physical and organizational settings in which care is given are conducive to the kind of care that can be expected to improve health and to be acceptable to patients and to the community. So much for quality assessment.

Letters to the Editor

Departments

  • Chickenpox in Apparently ‘Immune’ Hospital Workers

  • Inge Gurevich, Linda Jensen, Robert Kalter, Burke A. Cunha
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 510-512
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Letters to the Editor

Editorial

  • Improving Antibiotic Use Has Become Essential-Can Surgery Lead the Way?

  • John E. McGowan, Jr
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 575-577
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Letters to the Editor

Departments

  • JCAHO Inspections for Tertiary Care Facilities

  • Beth Raucher, Franklin W. McKinley, David Crimmins, Barbara Dillon, Susan Marchione
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 226-227
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Editorial

  • Surveillance of the Surgical Wound

  • Ronald Lee Nichols
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 513-514
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Medical Ostriches

  • Douglas R. LaBrecque
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 January 2022, pp. 126-128
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Letters to the Editor

  • On Duplicate Publication of a Manuscript

  • W.H. Seto, S.G. Ong, T.Y. Ching
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 336-340
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Editorial

  • The Choice of Microcomputer Software for Infection Control

  • David R. Reagan
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, pp. 178-179
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Letters to the Editor

Departments

  • Medical Congress in Africa

  • Giuliana Gialdroni, Carlo Grassi
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 June 2016, p. 451
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 1 of 11