Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:16:05.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Decision Analysis to Assess the Quality of Quality Assurance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Mary D. Nettleman*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
*
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, C41-GH, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242

Extract

The recent emphasis on outcome assessment has required hospitals not only to practice high quality care but also to prove that they do so. In search of leadership, many hospitals have turned to epidemiologists and infection control practitioners (ICPs), arguing that there are strong parallels between their activities and those of quality assurance. Both have the same ultimate goal of improving the health of the patient. The principles of surveillance, data management and problem solving used in epidemiology apply also to quality assurance. As advisers, participants or leaders, epidemiologists and ICPs are being drawn irresistibly into the field of quality assurance.

The need for leadership has arisen because the assessment of quality is a surprisingly complex task. Initial approaches are often unstructured and designed to fulfill the requirements of various regulatory agencies rather than to improve the delivery of care. In addition, quality assurance is costly, and financial restrictions on medicine are increasing. It is time to take a serious look at the cost-effectiveness of quality assurance and apply the techniques of medical decision analysis to combat the inefficiency and ineffectiveness that often dominate the field.

Type
Special Sections
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Relman, AS. Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:12201222.10.1056/NEJM198811033191810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Wenzel, RP. Carlson, BB. Hospital epidemiology: beyond infection control and toward quality assurance. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 1988;10:6062.10.1016/0196-4399(88)90067-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Massanari, RM. Risk management: an epidemiologic approach. Infect Control. 1987;8:36.10.1017/S0195941700066911CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Wenzel, RP. The evolving art and science of hospital epidemiology. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:462470.10.1093/infdis/153.3.462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hierholzer, WJ. Linking hospital epidemiology and quality assurance: seasoned concepts in a new role. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:4244.Google Scholar
6. Laffel, G, Blumenthal, D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA. 1989;262:28692873.10.1001/jama.1989.03430200113036Google Scholar
7. Donabedian, A. Quality and coat: choices and responsibilities. Inquiry. 1988;25:9099.Google Scholar
8. Eisenberg, JM. Clinical economics: a guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA. 1989;262:28792886.10.1001/jama.1989.03430200123038Google Scholar
9. Klaucke, DN, Buehler, JW, Thacker, SB, et al. Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. MMWR. 1988;27:S1S18.Google Scholar
10. Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA. Townsend, TR, et al. Development of a statewide program for surveillance and reporting of hospital-acquired infections. J Infect Dis. 1979;140:741746.10.1093/infdis/140.5.741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA, Hunting, KJ, Gwaltney, JM. Hospital-acquired infections: I. surveillance in a university hospital. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:251260.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112223Google Scholar
12. Nettleman, MD. Decision analysis: a tool for infection control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:8891.10.1086/645792Google Scholar
13. Donabedian, A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:17431748.10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033Google Scholar
14. Hogg, RV, Ledolter, J. Engineering Statistics. New York. NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.; 1987:1617.Google Scholar
15. Colloton, JW. Academic medicine's changing covenant with society. Academic Medicine. 1989;64:5560.10.1097/00001888-198902000-00001Google Scholar