Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:41:13.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices Through Education Targeted at Senior Department Leaders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Daniel E. Everitt ,
Stephen B. Soumerai ,
Jerry Avorn ,
Henry Klapholz  and
Michael Wessels
Daniel E. Everitt*
Affiliation:
Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Brockton/W. Roxbury Veterans’ Administration Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Stephen B. Soumerai
Affiliation:
Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Jerry Avorn
Affiliation:
Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Henry Klapholz
Affiliation:
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Michael Wessels
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, 3rd Floor, 333 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prescribing antibiotics for perioperative prophylaxis in common surgical procedures presents an ideal target for educational intervention. In this situation, antibiotics are often used inappropriately, with consequent excess expense and risk of morbidity. We developed an educational intervention aimed at the choice and appropriate dosing of antibiotics for the prophylaxis of cesarean sections. Person-to-person educational messages targeted at authoritative senior department members were supplemented by brief reminders on a structured antibiotic order form. Time-series analyses were conducted on 34 months of antibiotic use data for 2,783 cesarean sections to estimate the trend of magnitude and significance of discontinuities associated with the start of the program. Prior to the intervention, 95% of sections receiving prophylaxis were given cefoxitin and 3% were given cefazolin. After the intervention, these proportions were reversed, with the shift in use occurring immediately after the intervention (p<.001). Two years after the intervention, virtually all patients undergoing cesarean sections who receive antibiotic prophylaxis are given cefazolin. Savings from this change alone accounted for over $26,000 each year, or $47.36 per patient-day of prophylaxis. Substantial changes in prescribing practices for routine procedures can be accomplished through the implementation of a coordinated educational program that enlists influential senior staff members in a department in which policy-making is highly centralized, coupled with a structured educational ordering system. Lasting improvements in clinical practices may be brought about by means that are noncoercive, inexpensive and well-accepted by medical staff.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 11 , Issue 11 , November 1990 , pp. 578 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shapiro, M, Townsend, TR, Rosner, B, Kass, E. Use of antimicrobial drugs in general hospitals. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:351–355.10.1056/NEJM197908163010703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Affeldt, JE. Antibiotic use is source of deviance from standards. Hospitals. August 16, 1984:74.Google Scholar
3. McGowan, JE, Finland, M. Effects of monitoring the usage of antibiotics: an interhospital comparison. South Med J. 1976;69:193–195.10.1097/00007611-197602000-00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Craig, WA, Uman, SJ, Shaw, WR, et al. Hospital use of antimicrobial drugs: survey at 19 hospitals and results of antimicrobial control program. Ann Intern Med. 1978;89:793–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Durbin, WA, Lapidas, B, Goldmann, DA. Improved antibiotic usage following introduction of a novel prescription system. JAMA. 1981;246:1796–1800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Echols, RM, Kowalsky, SF. The use of an antibiotic order form for antibiotic utilization- review: influence on physicans' prescribing patterns. J Infect Dis. 1984;150:803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. May, FE, Stewart, RB, Cluff, LE. Drug use in the hospital: evaluation of determinants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;16:834–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Avorn, J, Soumerai, SB. Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach: a randomized controlled trial of academically based ‘detailing.’ N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1457–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schaffner, W, Ray, WA, Federspiel, CF, Miller, WO. Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice: a controlled trial of three educational methods. JAMA. 1983;250:1728–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Eisenberg, JM. Doctors’ Decisions and the Cost of Medical Care: The Reasons for Doctors’ Practice Patterns and Ways to Change Them. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Fress Perspectives; 1986.Google Scholar
11. Rubenstein, E. Continuing medical education at Stanford: the back- to-medical-school program. Journal of Medical Education. 1973;48:911–918.Google ScholarPubMed
12 Geertsma, RH, Parker, RC, Whitbourne, SK. How physicians view the process of change in their practice behavior. Journal of Medical Education. 1982;57:752–761.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Thompson, RS, Kirz, HL, Gold, RA. Changes in physician behavior and cost savings associated with organizational recommendations on the use of “routine” chest x-rays and multichannel blood tests. Prev Med. 1983;12:385–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Check, WA. How to affect antibiotic prescribing practices. JAMA. 1980;244:2594–2595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1987;29:91–94.Google Scholar
16. Stiver, HG Forward, KR, Livingstone, RA, et al. Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145:158–163.10.1016/0002-9378(83)90483-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. D’Angelo, LJ, Sokol, RJ. Short- versus long-course prophylactic antibiotic treatment in cesarean section patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55:583–586.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Jacobson, JA, Hebertson, R, Kasworm, E. Comparison of ceforanide and cephalothin prophylaxis for vaginal hysterectomies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:643–647.10.1128/AAC.22.4.643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Avorn, J, Soumerai, SB, Taylor, W, et al. Reduction of incorrect antibiotic dosing through a structured educational order form. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1720–1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Gillings, D, Makuc, D, Siegel, E. Analysis of interrupted time-series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:38–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Safran, C, Porter, D, Lightfoot, J, et al. ClinQuery: a system for online searching of data in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:751–756.10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Wallace, RL, Major, MC, Yonekura, ML. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing emergency primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:533–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Hirschmann, JV, Inui, TS. Antimicrobial prophylaxis: a critique of recent trials. Rev Infect Dis. 1980;2:1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Soumerai, SB, Avorn, J. Efficacy and cost-containment in hospital pharmacotherapy: state of the art and future directions. Milbank Mem Fund Quart. 1984;62:447–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Achong, MR, Wood, J, Theal, HK, Goldberg, R, Thompson, DA. Changes in hospital antibiotic therapy after a quality-of-use study. Lancet. 1977;ii:1118–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Soumerai, SB, Avorn, J. Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263:549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Lomas, J, Anderson, GM, Domnick-Pierre, K, Vayada, E, Enkin, MW, Hannah, WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–1311.10.1056/NEJM198911093211906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Stross, JK, Bole, GG. Evaluation of a continuing education program in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:846–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed