Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:37:03.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of HIV Antibody and Antigen (p24) in Residual Blood on Needles and Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Djamshid Shirazian ,
Barry C. Herzlich ,
Foroozan Mokhtarian  and
David Grob
Djamshid Shirazian*
Affiliation:
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
Barry C. Herzlich
Affiliation:
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
Foroozan Mokhtarian
Affiliation:
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
David Grob
Affiliation:
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
*
Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a significant rate of percutaneous injury with needles during the care of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Following puncture injury, it is recommended that the source of the contaminating blood be checked, and if human immunodeficiency virus-type 1- (HIV-1)-seropositive, zidovudine prophylaxis be considered. As the source of contaminating blood may be unknown, we studied the detectability of HIV-1 antibody and circulating antigen (p24) in the residual blood from needles and pieces of glass at various intervals following exposure to blood. The residual volume of blood remaining in needles varied from 183 ±50 μ 1 for a 20 G needle to 7.8 ± 1 μ 1 for a 27 G needle, and the residual blood on small pieces of glass varied from 23 μ 1 for a piece weighing 558 mg to 2 μ 1 for a piece weighing 21 mg. Analysis of washed samples of residual blood from all 20 G through 26 G needles and from broken pieces of glass larger than 0.41 g that had been exposed to HIV-1-seropositive blood and left at room temperature for one hour, one day and one week resulted in positive tests for HIV-1 antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence and Western blot assays. The circulating antigen was detected in residual blood of 20 G through 26 G needles, but not from contaminated pieces of glass. This technique could be applied to situations where a healthcare worker pricked him- or herself with a needle or with a piece of glass that had been contaminated with blood of unknown seroreactivity. If HIV-1 ELISA, immunofluorescence, Western blot and circulating antigen assays are negative, the individual can be reassured. Because only 0.4% of needlestick injuries with HIV-1-seropositive blood have resulted in seroconversion, there must be other factors, as yet unknown, that predispose to infection.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , April 1990 , pp. 180 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Becker, CE, Cone, JE, Gerberding, J. Occupational infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), risks and risk reduction. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Weiss, SH, Saxinger, WC, Rechtman, D, et al. HTLV-III infection among health care workers, association with needle-stick injuries. JAMA. 1985;254:2089–2093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Jagger, J, Pearson, RD, Brand, JJ. Avoiding the hazards of sharp instruments. Lancet. 1986;1:1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Oksenhendler, E, Harsic, M, Le Roux, JM, Rabian, C, Clauvel, JP. HIV infection with seroconversion after a superficial needlestick injury to the finger. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:582. Letter.Google Scholar
5. Thurn, J, Willenbrink, K, Crossley, K. Needlestick injuries and needle disposal in Minnesota physicians' offices. Am J Med. 1989;86:575–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Barnes, DM. Health workers and AIDS: questions persist. Science. 1988:241:161–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. Management of HIV-1 infection in the hospital setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Rhame, FS, Maki, DG. The case for wider use of testing for HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 1989;3205:1248–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. La Fon, SW, Lehrman, SN, Barry, DW. Prophylactic ally administrated Retrovir in health care workers potentially exposed to human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wormser, GP, Rabkin, CS, Joline, C. Frequency of nosocomial transmission of HIV infection among health care workers. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:307–308.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Sande, MA. Transmission of AIDS, the case against casual contact. N Engl J Med 1986;314:381–382.Google Scholar
12. Friedland, GH, Saltzman, BR, Rogers, MF. Lack of transmission of HTLV-III/LAV infection to household contact of patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex with oral candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:344–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Lifson, AR. Do alternative modes for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus exist? JAMA. 1988;259:1353–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. DuBeau, CE. Risk of transmission of HTLV-III by needle stick. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1128. Letter.Google ScholarPubMed