Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:38:46.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing rubbing and scrubbing surgical hand antisepsis with propan-1-ol 60% in accordance with European regulation UNE-EN 12791:2016+A1:2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

Carlos Martin-Villa Open the ORCID record for Carlos Martin-Villa [Opens in a new window] ,
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo Open the ORCID record for Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo [Opens in a new window] ,
Luis Alou Open the ORCID record for Luis Alou [Opens in a new window] ,
Natalia González Open the ORCID record for Natalia González [Opens in a new window] ,
Marta Losa-Iglesias Open the ORCID record for Marta Losa-Iglesias [Opens in a new window] ,
María Luisa Gómez-Lus Open the ORCID record for María Luisa Gómez-Lus [Opens in a new window]  and
David Sevillano Open the ORCID record for David Sevillano [Opens in a new window]
Carlos Martin-Villa
Affiliation:
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo
Affiliation:
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Luis Alou*
Affiliation:
Área de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Natalia González
Affiliation:
Área de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Marta Losa-Iglesias
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
María Luisa Gómez-Lus
Affiliation:
Área de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
David Sevillano
Affiliation:
Área de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Luis Alou, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A crossover trial was conducted to compare hand rub and hand scrub-brush methods for reducing bacterial loads when using propan-1-ol-60% according to European regulations. Both methods significantly reduced the bacterial load immediately after antisepsis, but only the hand rub method achieved significant bacterial load reduction 3 hours after the procedure.

Keywords

antisepsiscrossover trialsurgical site infection
Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 11 , November 2021 , pp. 1382 - 1384
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryce, E, Spence, D, Roberts, F. An in-use evaluation of an alcohol-based pre-surgical hand disinfectant. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:635–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widmer, A. Surgical hand hygiene: scrub or rub? J Hosp Infect 2013;83 suppl 1:S35–S39.10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60008-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittet, D, Allegranzi, B, Boyce, J. The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:270.10.1086/600379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, A, Widmer, A. No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205–208.10.2307/30141985CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girard, R, Amazian, K, Fabry, J. Better compliance and better tolerance in relation to a well-conducted introduction to rub-in hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Norm, EN 12791. (2020, n.d.). UNE EN 12791:2016+A1:2018 Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Surgical hand disinfection. Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 2). European Standards website. https://www.en-standard.eu/une-en-12791-2016-a1-2018-chemical-disinfectants-and-antiseptics-surgical-hand-disinfection-test-method-and-requirements-phase-2-step-2/. Published 2018. Accessed December 15, 2020.Google Scholar
da Cunha, É, Matos, F, da Silva, A, de Araújo, E, Ferreira, K, Graziano, K. The efficacy of three hand asepsis techniques using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG 2%). Rev da Esc Enferm 2011;45:1440–1445.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, V, Bijie, H, Maki, D, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 36 countries, for 2004–2009. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:396–407.10.1016/j.ajic.2011.05.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed