Article contents
English Education for Technology and Science: The Formative Years, 1880–1902
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Extract
The England of 1880–1902 saw the final flowering of Imperialism and the beginnings of its collapse in the South African War of 1899. It was a period of tremendous optimism, when society as a whole appeared prosperous and ebullient, but in which social injustice and rank poverty were widespread. The Education Act of 1870, the democratization of government made possible by the enlargement of the franchise, the coming of the popular press, and the reorganization of local government were the pointers to a new conception of the Great Society (as one of Graham Wallas's books was entitled). The searching analysis of social organization made in the 1840's by Marx and Engels, combined with the liberal ideals inherited from the French Revolution and the American War of Independence, took a more kindly and acceptable form in the intense yet essentially gentle collectivist doctrines of post-Utilitarianism, Fabian Socialism, and organized Labor—movements in which John Stuart Mill, Sidney Webb, H. G. Wells, Graham Wallas, and Keir Hardie were prominent. A. V. Dicey, in his great book on the origins of the British welfare state, underlines the fact that essential reforms were made possible by the climate of opinion, especially after 1870: education was able to ride high on the tide of these reforms.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1962, University of Pittsburgh Press
References
Notes
1. Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relation Between Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century (London, 1905). These were originally delivered at Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
2. Ashworth, William, An Economic History of England, 1870–1939 (London, 1960), 80.Google Scholar
3. Royal Commission on Scientific Instruction and the Advancement of Science (London, 1872–5), 3v.Google Scholar
4. Smith, Swire, Technical Education: Inaugural Address at Dundee Technical Institute (October 1888), 20.Google Scholar
5. SirHenry, Cole, Fifty Years of Public Life (London, 1884), Vol. I, 285ff.Google Scholar
6. Millis, C. T., Technical Education (London, 1925), 61.Google Scholar
7. For the early days of the City and Guilds see Sir Philip Magnus, Educational Aims and Efforts, 1880–1910 (London, 1910).Google Scholar
8. Report of the Royal Commissioners on Technical Instruction (London, 1882–4), 5v.Google Scholar
9. For instance it produced a detailed survey, Technical Education in England and Wales (London, 1889).Google Scholar
10. The Cockerton judgment of 1901, which dealt with this anomaly, is treated at length in Eric Eaglesham, From School Board to Local Authority (London, 1956).Google Scholar
11. The London Polytechnics are not to be confused with their German namesakes, which were institutions of university status. The London colleges were adult education centers, with a hard core of technical classes, which had been started by the philanthropic impulse of Quintin Hogg, grandfather of the present British Minister for Science. However, their influence is not to be underrated: in 1904, 500 Polytechnic students were working for external degrees of London University.Google Scholar
12. The work of the London T.E.B. is particularly well described by Sidney Webb in London Education (London, 1904). By 1902 Webb had bullied and intrigued the London County Council into spending £180,000 a year of Whisky Money on education, instead of ploughing it back to reduce the rates. He was indefatigable in pursuit of his collectivist ideals.Google Scholar
13. White, Brian D., A History of the Corporation of Liverpool, 1835–1914 (Liverpool, 1951), 154.Google Scholar
14. The old South Kensington system had been too much overlaid with the inheritance of laissez faire; nevertheless it did much useful work in the encouragement of local activities; for instance, it helped the Oldham School of Science which had more than 500 students in 1881 and was producing a useful number of draughtsmen and mechanics. A new system was certainly badly needed. Wells, H. G., one of the country's most vehement social critics, wrote: “Throughout the nineteenth century, one far-reaching dislocation after another had emphasized the growing need for … a new type of education based upon the enlightenment due to scientific discovery …. The drive of this need was resisted by the established religions, the ruling aristocracies and whatever remained of the ‘scholarly’ mediaeval universities” [and, we may add, by many of the industrialists, who should have known better]. See Wells, H. G., Experiment in Autobiography (London, 1934), Vol. I, 208. Wells was a student at South Kensington and gives an amusing account of this experience in his novel Love and Mr. Lewisham.Google Scholar
15. Record of Technical and Secondary Education, IV, 19 (1895).Google Scholar
16. Shimmin, A. N., The University of Leeds (London, 1954), 28.Google Scholar
17. Chapman, A. W., The Story of a Modern University (London, 1955). These qualifications underline the fact that much of the early work at the new universities was not of graduate standard—at Sheffield for instance only 142 out of 2,170 students were reading for degrees (see Dent, H. C., Universities in Transition (London, 1961).Google Scholar
18. Armytage, W. H. G., Civic Universities (London, 1955), 243–4.Google Scholar
19. Reeks, Margaret, History of the Royal School of Mines (London, 1920). Fay, C. R., Palace of Industry, 1851 (London, 1951), 112 ff.Google Scholar
20. Blanchet, Jeremy, Science, Craft, and the State (Unpubl. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford, 1953).Google Scholar
21. Quoted in Burn, D. L., The Economic History of Steel-making, 1867–1939 (London, 1940).Google Scholar
22. These Exhibition Commissioners are still (1962) in existence and include Sir Winston Churchill. It was always Prince Albert's dream that South Kensington should become a scientific and industrial research center, but the M.I.T. and Charlottenburg solution has never found favor in England; however South Kensington is now developing fast and the Imperial College is the center of a technological campus.Google Scholar
23. The upper and middle classes went of course to the Public Schools and grammar schools, which were still by and large, despite one or two notable exceptions like Oundle after 1892, wedded to a classical curriculum. But even here the twentieth century was catching up with them: the Public Schools Science Masters' Association was founded in 1901 by a group of Eton masters.Google Scholar
24. Smellie, K. B., A Hundred Years of English Government (London, 1951).Google Scholar
25. Smiles, Samuel, Industrial Biography, New ed. (London, 1889), 183.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by