1. For a discussion of the early development of this interest in schooling on the part of American historians, see Ray Hiner, N., “Professions in Process: Changing Relations between Historians and Educators,” History of Education Quarterly, 12 (1972):34–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. For examples see Bolster, Arthur S. Jr. “History, Historians and the Secondary School Curriculum,” Harvard Education Review, 32 (1962):39–65; Kirkendall, Richard S., “The Status of History in the Schools,” Journal of American History, 62 (1975):557–70; Kaplan, Thomas J., “History and the Secondary School Curriculum,” Educational Theory, 27 (1977):120–27; Tholfsen, Trygve R., “The Ambiguous Virtues of the Study of History,” Teachers College Record, 79 (1977):245–57; Partington, Geoffrey, “What History Should we Teach?” Oxford Review of Education, 6 (1980):157–76; Fox, Karen F.A. and Thompson, Jack C., “To What End: The Aims of Two Centuries of American History Instruction,” Teachers College Record, 82 (1980):31–46.Google Scholar

3. Russell, William F., “The Early Teaching of History in Secondary Schools,” History Teacher's Magazine, 5 (1914), quoted in Fox and Thompson, 33.Google Scholar

4. Lecture by Bowen, H.C., quoted in Chancellor, Valerie E., History for Their Masters, (Bath, 1970), p. 67.Google Scholar

5. New Zealand Department of Education, The Teaching of History in Primary and Secondary Schools, (Wellington, 1925), p. 13.Google Scholar

6. Karier, Clarence F., “Liberalism and the Quest for Orderly Change,” History of Education Quarterly, 12 (1972):69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Egan, Kieran, “Social Studies and the Erosion of Education,” Curriculum Inquiry, 13 (1983), 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Franklin, Barry M., “The Social Efficiency Movement Reconsidered: Curriculum Change in Minneapolis, 1917–1950,” Curriculum Inquiry, 12 (1983):10.Google Scholar

9. Giroux, Henry A. “Schooling and the Culture of Positivism: Notes on the Death of History,” Educational Theory, 29 (1979):265, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Ibid., 282.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 266.Google Scholar

12. Fitch, J.G., Lectures on Teaching, (Cambridge, 1881), p. 392.Google Scholar

13. Dumville, Benjamin, Teaching: Its Nature and Varieties, (London, 1921), pp. 389–90. In her study of nineteenth century American school texts, Ruth Miller Elson commented that “in nineteenth century American schoolbooks American life illustrates the best of all possible worlds… American institutions and character are the hope of all mankind.” Guardians of Tradition, (Lincoln, Neb., 1964), p. 166.Google Scholar

14. See Franklin; also Beyer, Landon E., “Ideology, Social Efficiency, and Curriculum Inquiry: An Essay Response to Franklin's ‘The Social Efficiency Movement Reconsidered,”’ Curriculum Inquiry, 12(1982): 305–16.Google Scholar

15. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Art of Rhetoric, XI, 2:19–21; quoted in Nadel, George H., “Philosophy of History Before Historicism,” in The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, edited by Bunge, Mario, (New York, 1964), p. 455.Google Scholar

16. A discussion of the exemplar approach to history can be found in Nadel. Also see Plumb, J.H., The Death of the Past, (London, 1969).Google Scholar

17. Goodrich, Charles A., A History of the United States of America, (Hartford, Conn., 1823), p. 1; quoted in Fox and Thompson, 35.Google Scholar

18. A discussion of the attitudes which tended to exclude women from the domain of public affairs can be found in Pateman, Carole, “‘The Disorder of Women’: Women, Love, and the Sense of Justice,” Ethics, 91 (1980):20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. The Teaching of History in Elementary and Secondary Schools, (New York, 1915), p. 98. These remarks of Johnson's can be compared with Giroux's comments regarding the onset of the suppression of critical historical consciousness in the twentieth century. The kind of history which emphasized loyalty to the ruler and to a life shaped by “national ideals” is not likely to have fostered the critical appraisal of contemporary institutions, suggesting that the maintenance of a form of cultural hegemony through manipulative history teaching predates the period in which Giroux places its genesis.Google Scholar

20. Lodge, Gonzales, “The Value of the Classics in Training for Citizenship,” Teachers College Record, 18 (1917):113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Compayre, Gabriel, Lectures on Pedagogy, Translated by Payne, W.H., (Boston, 1898), p. 13.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., p. 203.Google Scholar

23. Payne, Joseph, Lectures on the Science and Art of Education, edited by Payne, Joseph Frank, (London, 1883), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar

24. For example see Compayre, , pp. 343–44.Google Scholar

25. Dumville, , pp. 308, 313.Google Scholar

26. Compayre, , p. 344.Google Scholar

27. America Revised (Boston, 1979).Google Scholar

28. McClintock, Robert, “Toward a Place for Study in a World of Instruction,” Teachers College Record, 73 (1971):182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. Tholfsen, , 253.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., 254.Google Scholar

31. See Gallic, W.B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1955–56): 167–98.Google Scholar

32. University Grants Committee Handbook, (Wellington, 1978), p. 158. Emphasis added.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., p. 225.Google Scholar

34. Philosophy of Right, translated by Knox, T.M., (Oxford, 1942), pp. 122–23.Google Scholar

35. The Philosophy of History, Translated by Sibree, J., (New York, 1965), p. 38. See also Mandelbaum, Maurice, History, Man and Reason, (Baltimore and London, 1971), pp. 179–81.Google Scholar

36. Burgess, John W. The Foundations of Political Science, (New York, 1933), p. 80; quoted in Loewenberg, Bert James, “John William Burgess, the Scientific Method, and the Hegelian Philosophy of History.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 42 (1955):501.Google Scholar

37. McClintock, , 183.Google Scholar

38. Karier, , 60.Google Scholar

39. For discussions of organicism and its debt to the Hegelians, see Phillips, D.C., “Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 31 (1970):413–32; and Phillips, D.C., Dewey, John and the Organismic Archetype,” Melbourne Studies in Education, (1971): 232–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Phillips, , “Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” 415.Google Scholar

41. Hegel, G.W.F., The Science of Logic, translated by Johnson, W.H. and Struthers, L.G., (London, 1929). quoted in Phillips, , “Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” 415.Google Scholar

42. Phillips, , “John Dewey and the Organismic Archetype.” 235.Google Scholar

43. Dewey, John. Individualism Old and New, (New York, 1929), pp. 81–82.Google Scholar

44. Durkheim, Emile. Moral Education, translated by Wilson, Everett K. and Schnurer, Herman. (New York, 1961), p. 60–61.Google Scholar

45. See Scott, Colin A., Social Education, (Boston, 1908), p. 14.Google Scholar

46. Spring, Joel H., Education and the Rise of the Corporate State, (Boston, 1972), xiii; Dewey, , pp. 92–93.Google Scholar

47. The Promise of American Life, edited by Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., (Cambridge, Mass., 1965), p. 62. For discussions of Croly, see Schlesinger's Introduction to The Promise of American Life; also Spring, pp. 133ff.Google Scholar

48. Croly, , p. 64.Google Scholar

49. Ibid., p. 64.Google Scholar

50. See, for example, Snedden, David, “Education for a World of Team-Players and Team Workers,” School and Society, 20 (1924):552–57.Google Scholar

51. Croly, , p. 431.Google Scholar

52. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, edited by Link, Arthur S., et al., Vol. 23, (Princeton, 1977), pp. 482–83.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., Vol. 18, (Princeton, 1974), p. 603; also see ibid., Vol. 17, (Princeton, 1974), pp. 569–82.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., Vol. 23, pp. 483–84.Google Scholar

55. Dewey, , p. 83.Google Scholar

56. Sandalow, Terrance, “The Distrust of Politics.” New York University Law Review, 56 (1981):452.Google Scholar

57. Ibid., 460.Google Scholar

58. Feinberg, Walter. “Progressive Education and Social Planning.” Teachers College Record, 73 (1971–72): 486.Google Scholar

59. See Spring, , pp. 49–50.Google Scholar

60. Croly, . p. 138.Google Scholar

61. Stevens, Edward W. Jr., “Social Centers. Politics, and Social Efficiency in the Progressive Era,” History of Education Quarterly, 12 (1972):22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62. The Committee on Social Studies of the Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education of the National Education Association. The Social Studies in Secondary Education, (Washington, 1916), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

63. Ibid., p. 12.Google Scholar

64. Ibid., p. 23.Google Scholar

65. Wiebe, Robert H., The Segmented Society, (New York, 1975), p. 29.Google Scholar

66. Ibid., pp. 84–89.Google Scholar

67. Committee on Social Studies, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar

68. For example, see Compayre, , p. 186.Google Scholar

69. Cavallo, Dominick, Muscles and Morals, (Philadelphia, 1981), p. 53.Google Scholar

70. Phillips, , “Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” 429–32.Google Scholar

71. Cavallo, , p. 5.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., p. 3.Google Scholar

73. See ibid., pp. 90–94.Google Scholar

74. See Curtis, Henry. The Practical Conduct of Play, (New York, 1915), p. 212; quoted in Cavallo, p. 94.Google Scholar

75. See Mandelbaum, , chap. 6.Google Scholar

76. Herbst, Jurgon. The German Historical School in American Scholarship, (Ithaca, New York, 1965), p. 68.Google Scholar

77. For Spencer's views, see The Principles of Sociology, 2 Vols., (New York, 1896), Vol. 1. Part 2, chaps. 1–2.Google Scholar

78. See Peel, J.D.Y., Herbert Spencer. The Evolution of a Sociologist, (London, 1971), pp. 232–34.Google Scholar

79. Dawson, Edgar. Teaching the Social Studies, (New York, 1928), p. 267.Google Scholar

80. See Young, Robert M., “Darwin's Metaphor: Does Nature Select?,” The Monist, 55 (1971):442–503; for Dewey's view see “The Influence of Darwinism on Philosophy.” in The Influence of Darwinism on Philosophy, and other Essays in Contemporary Thought, (New York, 1910).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

81. On Darwin's earlier commitment to this view, see Mandelbaum, , p. 85.Google Scholar

82. For example, see Johnson, Henry, p. 78.Google Scholar

83. See Hofstadter, Richard. The Progressive Historians, (New York, 1969), p. 7.Google Scholar

84. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

85. The Social Studies in General Education. Report of the Committee on the Function of the Social Studies in General Education for the Commission of Secondary School Curriculum. (New York and London, 1940), p. 31.Google Scholar

86. Ibid., p. 32.Google Scholar

87. Walton, A.S., “Hegel, Utilitarianism, and the Common Good,” Ethics, 93 (1983), 760; see also Mosher, Michael A., “Civic Identity in the Juridical Society—On Hegelianism as Discipline for the Romantic Mind.” Political Theory, 11 (1983):117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

88. See, for example. Parrington, Vernon, The Beginnings of Critical Realism in America, (New York, 1930), p. 410. For the development of this view, see Hofstadter, , and also Crowe, Charles, “The Emergence of Progressive History,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 27 (1966): 109–24; and Higham, John et al., History, (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965), pp. 171–232.Google Scholar

90. See ibid., pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

91. Scott, , p. 94.Google Scholar

92. Hudson, Jay William, “Recent Shifts in Ethical Theory and Practice,” The Philosophical Review, 49 (1940), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

93. Ibid., 116.Google Scholar

94. Lockridge, Kenneth A., Settlement and Unsettlement in Early America, (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

95. Cardinal Principles of Secondary Education. A Report of the Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education, Appointed by the National Education Association, (Washington, D.C., 1918), pp. 7, 10.Google Scholar

96. Hatch, Roy Winthrop, Training in Citizenship, (New York, 1926), p. 8.Google Scholar

97. Ibid., p. 14.Google Scholar

98. Ibid., p. 10.Google Scholar

99. The Social Studies in General Education, p. 189. That this view has endured well toward the present can be seen in Niemeyer, John H., “Education for Citizenship,” in Social Studies in the Elementary School. 56th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, edited by Henry, Nelson B., (Chicago, 1957), p. 221.Google Scholar

100. See Oliver, Donald W., “The Selection of Content in the Social Sciences.” Harvard Educational Review, 27 (1957):271–300.Google Scholar

101. Teaching History in Elementary and Secondary Schools, p. 160; also see Hatch, , pp. 67–68.Google Scholar

102. For a discussion of the way history textbooks re-engineered the past to suit present interests, see Fitzgerald, .Google Scholar

103. Klapper, Paul, The Teaching of History, (New York and London, 1926), p. 4.Google Scholar

104. On historicism generally, see Lee, Dwight E. and Beck, Robert N., “The Meaning of ‘Historicism,”’ American Historical Review, 59 (1953–54):568–77. The specific meaning of the term used here is that of Popper, Karl R. in The Poverty of Historicism, (London, 1957).Google Scholar

105. The Teaching of History in Primary and Secondary Schools, p. 12.Google Scholar

106. Ibid., p. 11.Google Scholar

107. The Social Studies in General Education, p. 183.Google Scholar

108. Southern, R.W., The Shape and Substance of Academic History, (Oxford, 1961), pp. 15ff. Google Scholar

109. Iggers, Georg G., “The Image of Ranke in American and German Historical Thought,” History and Theory, 2 (1962): 17–40; see also Iggers, Georg G. and von Moltke, Konrad, The Theory and Practice of History Leopold von Ranke, (Indianapolis and New York, 1973), Introduction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110. See Stull Holt, W., “The Idea of Scientific History in America.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 1 (1940): 354ff. Google Scholar

111. For example, see Cheney, Edward P., “Law in History,” American Historical Review, 29 (1924):231–48.Google Scholar

112. See Higham, John, “Beyond Consensus: The Historian as Moral Critic,” American Historical Review, 67 (1961–62):612.Google Scholar

113. Nichols, Roy F., “Postwar Reorientation of Historical Thinking,” American Historical Review, 54 (1948–49):79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

114. Becker, Carl L., “Everyman His Own Historian,” American Historical Review, 37 (1931–32):221–36; Beard, Charles A., “Written History as an Act of Faith,” American Historical Review, 39 (1933–34): 219–29. See also Higham, , History, pp. 117–31.Google Scholar

115. Nichols, , pp. 78, 81.Google Scholar

116. As, for example, Jones, Gareth E., “Towards a Theory of History Teaching,” History, 55 (1970):57.Google Scholar