Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:07:29.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After the Emergence: Voluntary Support and the Building of American Research Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Roger Geiger
Roger Geiger*
Affiliation:
Program on Non-Profit Organizations, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1908 and 1909 the science journalist Edwin E. Slosson visited and described fourteen of what he called “The Great American Universities.” The volume of that title which he published still deserves a place among the most interesting books of this century on higher education. The members of his select group—California, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin among the state universities; Columbia, Harvard, Pennsylvania, Princeton, and Yale from the descendents of the colonial colleges; and Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Stanford, and Chicago from the “new” endowed universities—these schools for the most part led other institutions of higher education in numbers of students, the size of their budgets, and the scholarly achievements of their faculties.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Fall 1985 , pp. 369 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Slosson, Edwin E., Great American Universities (N.Y., 1910).Google Scholar

2. Veysey, Laurence R., The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965).Google Scholar

3. Geiger, Roger L., American Research Universities in the Twentieth Century (N.Y., forthcoming). This volume contains more complete documentation for the material used in this paper.Google Scholar

4. Veysey, Laurence R., “The History of Education,” Reviews in American History, 10, 4(Dec. 1982):281–91.Google Scholar

5. Arnett, Trevor, College and University Finance (N.Y., 1922), pp. 10–12; also, U.S. Bureau of Education, Bulletin, No. 30(1918):44.Google Scholar

6. Data from Geiger.Google Scholar

7. Lawrence, Bishop William, Memories of a Happy Life (N.Y., 1926), pp. 215–16; Harris, Seymour E., The Economics of Harvard (N.Y., 1970), p. 78.Google Scholar

8. Data from Slosson.Google Scholar

9. Curti, Merle & Nash, Roderick. Philanthropy and the Shaping of American Higher Education (New Brunswick, 1965).Google Scholar

10. Arnett, Trevor, “To What Extent Should College Students Pay the Cost of Education?” Association of University and College Business Officers of the Eastern States, Minutes of the Eighth Annual Meeting, (1927), pp. 18–29.Google Scholar

11. Hawkins, Hugh, “University Identity: The Teaching and Research Functions” in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920, Oleson, Alexandra & Voss, John, eds. (Baltimore, 1979), pp. 285–312.Google Scholar

12. Quoted in Peckham, Howard H., The Making of the University of Michigan, 1817–1967 (Arbor, Ann, 1967), p. 140.Google Scholar

13. Data from Geiger.Google Scholar

14. Clark, Burton R., “Perspectives on Higher Education: The Organizational View” in Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views, Clark, Burton R., ed. (Los Angeles, 1984).Google Scholar