Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The question of Church-State relations in Italy in the 19th and early 20th centuries was as critical a problem to Italian statesmen as that of the “Mezzogiorno” The hostility of the Roman Catholic Church towards the new Italian nation spanned five popes and almost seventy years, lasting until the signing of the Lateran Accords in 1929 during the pontificate of Pius XI. During this entire period the Vatican refused to recognize the legitimacy of the Italian government; the “non-expedit” forbidding Catholic participation in politics was not lifted entirely until 1919; and the Holy Father remained in voluntary exile in his apartments until after 1929. In return, the Italian governments of the Liberal Era used the power of the state to harass the Church, encouraging anti-clericalism and Masonry among the people and limiting the influence of Catholicism whenever possible. Although gradually the Church and the Italian State became accustomed to the status quo and the strongest waves of anticlericalism seemed to have passed by 1963, there nonetheless remained a strong current of suspicion which lasted well into the 20th century. Indeed, by 1900 it was not possible to speak of the realization of Cavour's celebrated formula, “A free Church in a free State”, for Italians had been embittered by the inflamed passions emanating from both sides of the Vatican walls.
1. Webster, Richard, The Cross and the Fasces (Stanford, California, 1960).Google Scholar
2. Delzell, Charles, ed. Mediterranean Fascism 1919–1945: Selected Documents (New York, 1970), p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Jemolo, A. C., Church and State in Italy 1850–1950 (Oxford, 1960), p. 185.Google Scholar
4. Blinchy, D. A., Church and State in Fascist Italy (Oxford, 1970), p. 444.Google Scholar
5. Quoted in Blinchy, , Church and State, p. 443.Google Scholar
6. Nuovo Paese (Milan) 18 February 1923.Google Scholar
7. Osservatore Romano (Vatican City) 18 September 1923.Google Scholar
8. “La Nuova Riforma Scolastica”, Civilta Cattolica, 21 February 1924. “L'insegnamento Religiose nella scuola”, 1 March 1924.Google Scholar
9. “L'insegnamento religioso nella scuola e nelle parrochia”, Civilta Cattolica, 1 March 1924, 31.Google Scholar
10. See, for example, “Norme della S. Congregazione del Concilio per l'insegnamento religioso nelle scuole medie pubbliche”, Civilta Cattolica, 18 October 1930, and “L'insegnamento di relgione e gli alunni delle scuole medie dello stato, Ibid. 15 October 1930.Google Scholar
11. “La Nuova Riforma”, Civilta, 1 March 1924, 385.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., p. 387.Google Scholar
13. Atti del parlamento italiano. Camera dei deputati. Sessione 1921–2 3. Legislature XXVI. Discussioni (Rome, 1923), v. IX, p. 8394.Google Scholar
14. Blinchy, , p. 496.Google Scholar
15. The New York Times, 29 March 1928.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., 31 March 1928.Google Scholar
17. Osservatore Romano, 28, 31 May 1928.Google Scholar
18. Civilta Cattolica, “Cronaca Contemporanea: Cose Romane”, 25 May 7 June 1928, 553.Google Scholar
19. Ibid., “Cronaca Contemporanea: Cose Romane”, 27 December 1928–10 January 1929, 172. Also see, p. 10 XI, Discorsi agli universitari (Rome: 1932).Google Scholar
20. Delzell, , pps. 163–164.Google Scholar
21. Ibid., p. 164.Google Scholar
22. Webster, , p. 111.Google Scholar
23. Gentile, Giovanni, “La Conciliazione”, Educazione fascista, anno VII, no. 2, February 1929, 81.Google Scholar
24. “Relazione alla Camera dei deputati sugli accordi del Laterano”. in Mussolini, B., Opera omnia di Benito Mussolini: Dagli accordi del Laterano al dodicesimo anniversario della fondazione dei fasci (Florence, 1958), pps. 87–88.Google Scholar
25. Ibid., p. 88.Google Scholar
26. The New York Times, 16 May 1929.Google Scholar
27. “Relazione …”, in Mussolini, , p. 88.Google Scholar
28. The New York Times, 16 May 1929.Google Scholar
29. Popolo di Roma, 16 May 1929.Google Scholar
30. “Discorso al Senato sugli accordi del Laterano”, in Mussolini, Benito, p. 101.Google Scholar
31. Ibid. Google Scholar
32. Ibid. Google Scholar
33. Quoted in Blinchy, , p. 457.Google Scholar
34. “Discorso al Senato”, in Mussolini, , pps. 101ff.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., p. 102.Google Scholar
36. Osservatore Romano, 5 June 1929. The New York Times, 6 June 1929.Google Scholar
37. Osservatore Romano, 22 June 1929; The New York Times, 23 June 1929 .Google Scholar
38. Osservatore Romano, 6 July 1929; The New York Times, 1 July 1929.Google Scholar
39. More than one prelate in the interwar period could attest to this fact. See, for example, the account of Cardinal Innitzer's interview with Pius in Falconi, Carlo, The Popes of the XXth Century. (Boston: 1967).Google Scholar
40. “Echi dell'enciclica sull'educazione”, Civilta Cattolica, 15 March 1930, 481–92.Google Scholar
41. Ibid., p 491.Google Scholar
42. Divini illius Magistri (or Rapprentati in Terra), reprinted in the Supplement to the Catholic School School Journal , February 1930, p. 2.Google Scholar
43. Ibid. Google Scholar
44. Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
45. Ibid. Google Scholar
46. “Echi dell'enciclica …”, Civiltà Cattolica, 15 March 1930; Osservatore Romano, 10 February 1930.Google Scholar
47. Osservatore Romano, 15 March 1930.Google Scholar
48. Ibid. Google Scholar
49. Iervolino, Angelo R., “La G.C. ed il problemma educativa”, Osservatore Romano, 15 March 1930.Google Scholar
50. Even a cursory review of Osservatore during these months adequately demonstrates this contention.Google Scholar
51. Osservatore Romano, 25 June 1930.Google Scholar
52. Ibid., 23 June 1930.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., 11 August 1930.Google Scholar
54. Mon. Montini, Giovanni B., “L'insegnamento religioso nelle scuole: La missione del maestro”, Osservatore Romano, 15 August 1930.Google Scholar
55. Quoted in Blinchy, , p. 513.Google Scholar
56. Tannenbaum, Edward, The Fascist Experience: Culture and Society in Fascist Italy (New York, 1972), p. 193.Google Scholar
57. “Intorno al Conflitto sull'Azione Cattolica Italiana (Documenti pontifici),” Civiltà Cattolica, 20 June 1931, 546.Google Scholar
58. Quoted in The New York Times, 7 June 1931.Google Scholar
59. Blinchy, , p. 522.Google Scholar
60. Delzell, , p. 172.Google Scholar
61. Scoppola, Pietro, La Chiesa e il fascismo: Documenti e interpretazioni (Rome: 1976), p. 269.Google Scholar
62. Falconi, C., The Popes of the Twentieth Century (Boston, 1967), p. 233.Google Scholar
63. The New York Times, 8 July 1931.Google Scholar
64. There were, of course, cases of Italians renouncing their Fascist Party memberships, but these were in a decided minority.Google Scholar
65. See, for example, Letture: Classe Terza (Rome, 1931); Letture: Classe Seconda (Rome, 1932); Corso di Letture per Scuole Elementare (Turin, 1935).Google Scholar
66. This collection was temporarily housed in Casa Italiana, Columbia University. It has been subsequently transferred to the Sacco and Vanzetti Collection of the Boston Public Library.Google Scholar
67. Tannenbaum, , p. 202.Google Scholar
68. Delzell, C., p. 149.Google Scholar
69. A prime example of this prefunctory attendance at G.U.F. membership gatherings was the young student Moro, Aldo, who was president of the F.U.C.I. from 1939–1942.Google Scholar
70. “La Carta della Scuola”, Civiltà Cattolica, 4 March 1939, 496.Google Scholar
71. Ibid. Google Scholar
72. “Questioni fondamentali nella ‘Carta della Scuola”’, Civiltà Cattolica, 20 May 1939, 298.Google Scholar
73. Scarangello, A., Church and State in Italian Education (unpublished PhD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1966), p. 226.Google Scholar
74. Delzell, C., p. 148.Google Scholar