Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:44:17.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Faith One's Own: Kevin Hector's Defense ofModern Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2016

Charles E. Lockwood
Charles E. Lockwood*
Affiliation:
Oberlin College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In The Theological Project of Modernism, Kevin Hector of theUniversity of Chicago Divinity School offers a nuanced and timely defense ofwhat he sees as an unjustifiably maligned tradition in modern Christiantheology. He focuses on what is commonly labeled the liberal or revisionisttradition, centered in its early stages on figures such as Immanuel Kant,Friedrich Schleiermacher, G. W. F. Hegel, Albrecht Ritschl, Ernst Troeltsch,and, more recently, Paul Tillich. By carefully reconstructing key arguments fromthese thinkers, Hector shows not only how this trajectory hangs together as atradition, but also how its animating impulse differs from what many criticshave assumed. Hector's central claim is that this tradition isfundamentally concerned with a distinctive problem, namely, how to relatereligious faith to a sense of one's life as one's own—or,put differently, how one's faith can be self-expressive. Hector labelsthis the problem of “mineness,” or the problem of “howpersons could identify with their lives or experience them as‘mine,’ especially given their vulnerability to tragedy,injustice, luck, guilt, and other ‘oppositions’” (viii).Hector argues that for his chosen thinkers in this tradition, faith—morespecifically, faith in a God who is able to reconcile suchoppositions—plays a crucial role in resolving this problem.

Type
Review Essay*
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 109 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 637 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Kevin W. Hector, The Theological Project of Modernism: Faith andthe Conditions of Mineness (Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2015). 288 pp. $110 hb. Page references appear in parentheses inthe text.

References

1 Hector, Theology without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Reconciliation (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

2 The labels used here to characterize this debate are a matter of some dispute, but they are nevertheless widely used in accounts of modern Christian theology. In recent decades, prominent figures associated with a liberal or revisionist perspective include Edward Farley, Gordon Kaufman, Schubert Ogden, and David Tracy, while those associated with postliberalism include George Lindbeck, Hans Frei, Stanley Hauerwas, and Ronald Thiemann. By some accounts, figures associated with “radical orthodoxy,” such as John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock, and Graham Ward, might also be identified with a postliberal perspective. For informative overviews of these movements, see James J. Buckley, “Revisionists and Liberals,” and Fodor, James, “Postliberal Theology,” in The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Thought since 1918 (ed. Ford, David F. with Muers, Rachel; 3rd ed.; Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar. Recent works mapping out areas of agreement and disagreement in this debate include Kamitsuka, David G., Theology and Contemporary Culture: Liberation, Postliberal and Revisionary Perspectives (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Knight, John Allan, Liberalism versus Postliberalism: The Great Divide in Twentieth-Century Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

3 Barth, Karl, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Its Background and History (trans. Cozens, Brian and Bowden, John; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002)Google Scholar. A similar narrative, focused more narrowly on Kant but also giving some attention to the post-Kantian trajectory of modern theology, can be found in Michalson, Gordon E. Jr., Kant and the Problem of God (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999)Google Scholar. Such strongly anthropocentric readings of Kant have been challenged in a series of works by Hare, John E., including The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar; and God and Morality: A Philosophical History (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007); as well as Insole, Christopher J., Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. As Hector mentions in a footnote, a narrative that shares some similarities with his own approach to modern theology is Dorrien, Gary, Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Carter, J. Kameron, Race: A Theological Account (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ibid., 373.

6 King, Martin Luther Jr., “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” in Why We Can't Wait (New York: Harper and Row, 1964)Google Scholar.

7 Barth divides his Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century into sections on the “background” and “history” of modern theology, and he situates Kant and Hegel as part of the “background,” rather than as part of the actual theological “history.” Coming from another perspective, a prominent philosophical reading of Kant and Hegel that downplays their theological contributions is Pippin, Robert B., Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture (2nd ed.; Oxford: Blackwell, 1999)Google Scholar. Hector briefly mentions Pippin in a footnote.

8 Frei, Hans W., Types of Christian Theology (ed. Hunsinger, George and Placher, William C.; New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992) 2 Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., 5.

10 Ibid. 3–4.

11 Freud, Sigmund, The Future of an Illusion (ed. and trans. Strachey, James; New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1961)Google Scholar.

12 Daly, Mary, Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women's Liberation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

13 Cone, James H., A Black Theology of Liberation (20th anniv. ed.; Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1990) 28 Google Scholar.

14 Ibid.

15 The relationship between religion and race in the work of Kant and Schleiermacher, as well as J. G. Herder, is carefully examined in Theodore Vial, Modern Religion, Modern Race (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).

16 The disparaging treatment of Judaism in Kant and Schleiermacher is just one instance of this problem, and numerous other examples could be given as well.