No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2011
The very multiplicity of the attempts which have been made to solve the exegetical problem presented by the difficult Logion of St. Matthew 11, 12 is in itself a strong indication that no one of the proffered interpretations can claim for itself a pre-eminent position; and inasmuch as all the thought that has been expended upon the Saying has not succeeded in discovering in it a meaning that by its inherent probability compels us to accept it as the true interpretation, it is inevitable that we should wonder whether some error can have crept into the text.
1 For some of these facts I am indebted to my friend and colleague, Professor S. H. Hooke.
2 See Hastings's Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. I, p. 74a (Taylor), and Vol. IV, p. 949a (Kenyon).
3 The Words of Jesus (English Translation), pp. 141, 142.