² Paul Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State?, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994; Stein Kuhnle and M. Alestalo (eds), Survival of the European Welfare State, London, Routledge, 2000; Guiliano Bonoli, Vic George and Peter Taylor-Gooby, European Welfare Futures: Towards a Theory of Retrenchment, Cambridge, Polity, 2000; Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001; Maurizio Ferrara and Martin Rhodes (eds), Recasting European Welfare States, London and Portland, Frank Cass, 2000; E. Huber and J. Stephens, Development and Crisis of the Welfare State, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2001; Lindbom, Anders, ‘Dismantling the Social Democratic Welfare Model? Has the Swedish Welfare State Lost its Defining Characteristics?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 24: 3 (2001), pp. 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Gøsta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity, 1990; Bo Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998. See Pierson, The New Politics of the Welfare State.Google Scholar

⁴ Duane Swank, Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

⁵ Torbjörn Nilsson, Moderaterna, marknaden och makten: svensk högerpolitik under avregleringens tid, 1976–1991, Huddinge, Samtidshistoriska institutet, Södertörns högskola, 2003. See Kees van Kersbergen, Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London, Routledge, 1995. Peter Baldwin, The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State 1875–1975, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

⁶ Walter Korpi, Den demokratiska klasskampen. Svensk politik i jämförande perspektiv, Stockholm, Tiden, 1981.Google Scholar

⁷ Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State?.Google Scholar

⁸ Alber Jens, ‘Selectivity, Universalism, and the Politics of Welfare Retrenchment in Germany and the United States’, paper presented at APSA 92nd Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 31 August 1996; Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim, ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries 1975–95’, American Political Science Review, 97: 3 (2003), pp. 425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ Lindbom, ‘Dismantling the Social Democratic Welfare Model?’.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ross, F., ‘Interests and Choice in the “Not Quite so New” Politics of Welfare’, West European Politics, 23: 2 (2000), pp. 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Christoffer Green-Pedersen, The Politics of Justification: Party Competition and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2002; Anders Balslev, ‘Gensyn med blame avoidance-hypotesen: En empirisk analyse af nedskäringer i 12 svenske overförselsindkomster’, thesis, University of Århus, Department of Political Science, 2002.Google Scholar

¹² Swank, Global Capital; Huber and Stephens, Development and Crisis of the Welfare State.Google Scholar

¹³ Korpi and Palme, ‘New Politics and Class Politics’; Allen, James P. and Scruggs, Lyle, ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies’, American Journal of Political Science, 48: 3 (2004), pp. 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Korpi and Palme, ‘New Politics and Class Politics’.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Balslev, ‘Gensyn med blame avoidance-hypotesen’.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff, ‘Why Do Welfare States Persist?’, Journal of Politics, 68: 4 (2006), pp. 816–27;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Christian Albrekt Larsen, ‘The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41: 2, pp. 145–68.

¹⁷ Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism; Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter; Korpi, Den demokratiska klasskampen.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Korpi, Walter, ‘Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism’, World Politics, 58: 2 (2006), pp. 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Joakim Palme, personal communication.Google Scholar

²⁰ Jonas Hinnfors, Familjepolitik : samhällsförändringar och partistrategier 1960–1990, Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell, 1992.Google Scholar

²¹ Herbert Tingsten, Idékritik, Stockholm, Bonniers, 1941.Google Scholar

²² Emil Uddhammar, Partierna och den stora staten: en analys av statsteorier och svensk politik under 1900–talet, Stockholm, City University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

²³ Anders Lindbom, ‘De borgerliga partierna och pensionsreformen’, in Joakim Palme (ed.), Hur blev den stora kompromissen möjlig? Politiken bakom den svenska pensionsreformen, Stockholm, Pensionsforum, 2001, pp. 52–87; Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Lindbom, Anders, ‘Politics within Paths: The Trajectories of Danish and Swedish Earnings-Related Pensions’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16: 3 (2006), pp. 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ If the (perceived) risk is not strongly skewed toward other groups. For example, in Great Britain in the 1980s, the replacement levels were too low to crowd out private alternatives and the risk was probably also strongly skewed towards certain blue-collar groups in certain parts of the country. See Baldwin, The Politics of Social Solidarity; Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter.Google Scholar

²⁵ Kathleen Thelen and Sven Steinmo, ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth (eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

²⁶ Stigbjörn Ljunggren, Folkhemskapitalismen: högerns programutveckling under efterkrigstiden, Stockholm, Tiden, 1992; Kristina Boreus, Högerväg: nyliberalismen och kampen om spräket i svensk debatt 1969–1989, Stockholm, Tiden, 1994.Google Scholar

²⁷ Moderata Samlingspartiet, Handlingsprogram, Stockholm, Moderata Samlingspartiet, 1994, p. 35; my translation.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., p. 53; my translation.Google Scholar

²⁹ Jan Teorell, Demokrati eller fätalsvälde, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1998.Google Scholar

³⁰ The unemployment level was much lower in the 1980s than in 2006 and therefore it can be argued that the pressure of the problem was much lower. A highly ideological neoliberal party should not need such excuses to make cutbacks, though. And in the sickness benefit, there was a significant pressure already in the 1980s, Försäkringskassornas Riksförbund, Socialförsäkringen – ett system i inre upplösning?, Stockholm, FKS:s förlag, 2004, p. 68.Google Scholar

³¹ Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism; Korpi and Palme, ‘New Politics and Class Politics’.Google Scholar

³² Gary King, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Enquiry, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

³³ Boreus, Högerväg, p. 145; my translation.Google Scholar

³⁴ Motion 1984/85:2431. A few years later Moderaterna had adjusted its proposal slightly. The replacement rate would be 80 per cent for the first three months of sickness absence, then it would be increased to 90 per cent (Motion 1987/88: Fi223). This clearly is generous compared to the system in place in 2006.Google Scholar

³⁵ Försäkringskassornas Riksförbund, Socialförsäkringen. Google Scholar

³⁶ Svallfors Stefan, Vem älskar välfärdsstaten?: attityder, organiserade intressen och svensk välfärdspolitik, Lund, Arkiv, 1989; Stefan Svallfors, Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi, Umeä, Borea Förlag, 1996.Google Scholar

³⁷ Motion 1984/85:2431.Google Scholar

³⁸ SvD, 9/5 2004Google Scholar

³⁹ Motion 1984/95:900; Motion 1987/88:Fi223.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Motion 1990/91:Fi217.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter.Google Scholar

⁴² Folkpartiet/Moderaterna, ‘Ny start för Sverige’, electional material, 1991.Google Scholar

⁴³ Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism; Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Swank, Global Capital.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Ellen Immergut, Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992. Guiliano Bonoli, The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Allen and Scruggs, ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform’.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Adema Willem and Marcel Einerhand, The Growing Role of Private Insurance Social Benefits, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional papers 32, OECD, 1998.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Rothstein, Just Institutions Matter.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Bonoli, George and Taylor-Gooby, European Welfare Futures, p. 42.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Ibid., p. 31.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Barmby, Tim, Ercolani, Marco and Treble, John, ‘Sickness Absence in the UK 1984–2002’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11 (2004), pp. 65–88;Google Scholar

⁵² Pierson, ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’.Google Scholar

⁵³ Fredrik Reinfeldt, Mikael Odenberg and Anders Borg, DN DEBATT 4/3 2004; my translation.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Fredrik Reinfeldt, speech at Moderaterna Party Congress in 2005; my translation.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Stefan Svallfors, Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi; Stefan Svallfors, 2004 codebook with frequency tables, available at www.ssd.gu.se; DN 30/6 2006. The choice revolution that was initiated by the bourgeois government of 1991–94 has furthermore disarmed the party's earlier criticism of these sectors for inefficiency and unresponsiveness to consumers. See e.g. Blomqvist, Paula, ‘The Choice Revolution: The Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s’, Social Policy and Administration, 38: 2 (2004), pp. 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁶ Mats Wiklund, En av oss? En bok om Fredrik Reinfeldt, Rimbo, Fischer, 2006, pp. 233–6.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Motion 2005/2006:Fi 240.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Interview with Anders Borg; Wiklund, En av oss?.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Katarina Barrling, Partikulturer: Kollektiva självbilder och normer i Sveriges riksdag, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis, 2004.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Interview with Borg; Wiklund, En av oss?.Google Scholar

⁶¹ The government announced that it planned to legislate that the replacement rate of the sickness benefit would not exceed 75 per cent (after 12 months of sickness absence) whether or not the client had supplementary private insurance, but eventually had to make a retreat in face of the massive criticism it received from both unions and employers (DN 11/2 2008).Google Scholar

⁶² Interview with Borg.Google Scholar

⁶³ See Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State?.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Hinnfors would disagree, see Jonas Hinnfors, Reinterpreting Social Democracy, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Pierson, Dismantling the Welfare State?.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ The number of persons that were members of an unemployment insurance decreased by almost 400,000 during 2007 and the decrease has continued during 2008 but at a slower pace (another 50,000). As at 30 April 2008, the unemployment insurance schemes had 3,334,000 members (IAF, Arbetslöshetskassornas medlemsutveckling, www.iaf.se//iaftemplates/Page.aspx?id=126).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Lindbom, Anders, ‘Obfuscating Retrenchment: Swedish Welfare Policy in the 1990s’, Journal of Public Policy, 27: 2 (2007), pp. 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar