Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:37:10.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Opposition in Civil Society: An Analysis of the Interactions of Secular and Religious Associations in Algeria and Jordan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Francesco Cavatorta  and
Azzam Elananza
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lack of effective political parties is one of the dominant characteristics of modern Arab polities. The role of opposition to the authoritarian regimes is therefore left to a number of civil society organizations. This study examines the interactions among such groups in the context of the traditional transition paradigm and it analyses specifically how religious and secular organizations operate and interact. The empirical evidence shows that such groups, far from attempting any serious coalition-building to make common demands for democracy on the regime, have a competitive relationship because of their ideological differences and conflicting policy preferences. This strengthens authoritarian rule even in the absence of popular legitimacy. The article focuses its attention on Algeria and Jordan.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , 2008 , pp. 561 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2008.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Conference of the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), Boston, USA in November 2006. The two authors are grateful for the comments received and for this journal's anonymous referees' input. Finally, this research has been made possible by a grant (number HR/05/20) from Irish Aid, Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, Ireland.

References

2 Daniel Brumberg, Liberalisation Versus Democracy. Understanding Arab Political Reform, Carnegie Working Paper 37, Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2003, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

3 Willis, Michale, ‘Political Parties in the Maghrib: The Illusion of Significance’, Journal of North African Studies, 7: 2 (2002), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

4 Albrecht, Holger, ‘How Can Opposition Support Authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt’, Democratization, 12: 3 (2005), pp. 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Amy Hawthorne, Is Civil Society the Answer?, Carnegie Working Paper 44, Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

6 Sardamov, Ivan, ‘Civil Society and the Limits of Democratic Assistance’, Government and Opposition, 40: 3 (2005), pp. 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Thomas Carothers, ‘Civil Society’, Foreign Policy, 117 (1999/2000), pp. 18–29.Google Scholar

8 Encarnacion, Omar, ‘Civil Society Reconsidered’, Comparative Politics, 38: 3 (2006), pp. 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Berman, Sheri, ‘Islamism, Revolution and Civil Society’, Perspectives on Politics, 1: 2 (2003), pp. 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Tempest, Clive, ‘Myths from Eastern Europe and the Legend of the West’, Democratization, 4: 1 (1997), pp. 132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Abootalebi, Ali, ‘Civil Society, Democracy and the Middle East’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, 2: 3 (1998), pp. 46–59.Google Scholar

12 Augustus Norton, Civil Society in the Middle East, Leiden, Brill, 1996/96. See also Nonneman, Gerd, ‘Rentiers and Autocrats, Monarchs and Democrats, State and Society: The Middle East Between Globalisation, Human Agency and Europe’, International Affairs, 77: 1 (2001), pp. 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Berman, ‘Islamism, Revolution and Civil Society’; Hawthorne, Is Civil Society the Answer?; Yom, Sean, ‘Civil Society and Democratization in the Arab World’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, 9: 4 (2005), pp. 14–33.Google Scholar

14 Wiktorowicz, Quintan, ‘Civil Society as Social Control. State Power in Jordan’, Comparative Politics, 33: 1 (2000), pp. 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Ernest Gellner, Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Enemies, New York, Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar

16 See Cavatorta, Francesco, ‘Civil Society, Islamism and Democratisation: The Case of Morocco’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 44: 2 (2006), pp. 203–22;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Brumberg, Daniel, ‘Islamists and the Politics of Consensus’, Journal of Democracy, 13: 3 (2002), pp. 109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 John Entelis, ‘Civil Society and the Authoritarian Temptation in Algerian Politics: Islamic Democracy vs. the Centralized State’, in Augustus Richard Norton (ed.), Civil Society in the Middle East, Vol. 2, Leiden, Brill, 1996, pp. 45–86.Google Scholar

19 Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Touchstone, 2000.Google Scholar

20 Quintan Wiktorowicz (ed.), Islamic Activism. A Social Movement Theory Approach, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

21 Guillermo O'Donnell and Philippe Schmitter, Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

22 Giuseppe Di Palma, To Craft Democracies, Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

23 The case of the referendum called by Pinochet in Chile in 1988 is particularly telling in this respect.Google Scholar

24 Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

25 Carothers, Thomas, ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13: 1 (2002), pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 One of the best examples of this is how the Moroccan process of democratization is analysed because it has been going on for a number of decades. See Marvine Howe, Morocco. The Islamic Reawakening, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

27 Carothers, ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, p. 7.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., p. 9.Google Scholar

29 There is a large literature dealing with the concept of semi-democracies or quasi-democracies.Google Scholar

30 William Quandt, Between Ballots and Bullets, Washington, DC, Brookings Institute Press, 1998.Google Scholar

31 David Olson, ‘Democratization and Political Participation: The Experience of the Czech Republic’, in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott (eds), The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 150–96.Google Scholar

32 Gale Stokes, The Walls Came Tumbling Down. The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993, p. 30.Google Scholar

33 Philip Oxhorn, Organising Civil Society, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

34 See Cavatorta, ‘Civil Society, Islamism and Democratisation’.Google Scholar

35 Wendy Christiansen, ‘Femmes Unies contre l'impunité’, Le Monde Diplomatique, 625 (April 2006), p. 6.Google Scholar

36 Le Monde, 4 April 2006, p. 3Google Scholar

37 See Frédéric Volpi, Islam and Democracy, London, Pluto Press, 2003.Google Scholar

38 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

39 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

40 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

41 Clark, Janine, ‘The Conditions of Islamist Moderation: Unpacking Cross-Ideological Cooperation in Jordan’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 38: 4, (2006), pp. 539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Juan Goytisolo, L'Algérie dans la tourmente, Strasbourg, La Nuée Blue, 1994.Google Scholar

43 Le Monde, 4 April 2006, p. 3.Google Scholar

44 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

45 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

46 Interview with author, Amman, August 2006.Google Scholar

47 Adam Przeworski, ‘Some Problems in the Study of Transition to Democracy’, in Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead (eds), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 47–63.Google Scholar

48 Hinnebusch, Raymond, ‘Authoritarian Persistence, Democratization Theory and the Middle East: An Overview and Critique’, Democratization, 13: 3 (2006), pp. 373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Hawthorne, Is Civil Society the Answer? Google Scholar