Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:30:11.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Relations: Divided by a Common Language?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ian Clark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 271 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Carr, E. H., What is History?, London, Penguin Books, 2nd edn, 1990, p. 66 Google Scholar.

2 p. 402.

3 p. 416.

4 Hill, C., ‘History and International Relations’, in Smith, S. (ed.), International Relations: British and American Perspectives, Oxford, Blackwell, 1985, p. 130 Google Scholar.

5 lbid, p. 133.

6 pp. 42–3. This finding is not really supported by the more recent survey of IR by Steve Smith in which he sees a continuing differentiation between US and British IR on the basis of the latter’s greater historical sensitivity. See Smith, S., ‘The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2:3 (10 2000), p. 398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 22:1 (Summer 1997).

8 p. 23.

9 p. 301.

10 p. 36.

11 p. 6.

12 See the selections in Finney, P. (ed.), The Origins of the Second World War, London, Arnold, 1997, pp. 90–112 Google Scholar.

13 p. 294.

14 As in Allison, Graham, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, Little, Brown, 1971 Google Scholar.

15 See Hollis, M. and Smith, S., Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1991 Google Scholar.

16 ‘On Writing International History: Chaps, Maps and Much More’, International Affairs, 73:3 ( July 1997).

17 S. Smith, ‘The Discipline of International Relations’, op. cit., p. 378.

18 Maier, C. S., In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987 Google Scholar; Hogan, M. J., The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe 1947–1952, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

19 For example, Tilly, C., The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1975 Google Scholar.

20 See, typically, Clark, I., ‘Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 24:4 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999; Caparoso, J., ‘Across the Great Divide: Integrating Comparative and International Politics’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4 (1997)Google Scholar.