Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:24:05.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF BERGER SPHERES FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF SUBMANIFOLD THEORY

Part of: Local differential geometry Global differential geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

BYUNG HAK KIM ,
IN-BAE KIM  and
SADAHIRO MAEDA
BYUNG HAK KIM*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Institute of National Sciences, Kyung Hee University, Yong In 446-701, Korea e-mail: [email protected]
IN-BAE KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 130-791, Korea e-mail: [email protected]
SADAHIRO MAEDA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Saga University, Saga 840-8502, Japan e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, Berger spheres are regarded as geodesic spheres with sufficiently big radii in a complex projective space. We characterize such real hypersurfaces by investigating their geodesics and contact structures from the viewpoint of submanifold theory.

MSC classification

Primary: 53B25: Local submanifolds
Secondary: 53C40: Global submanifolds
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 137 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, T., Kameda, M. and Maeda, S., Geometric meaning of Sasakian space forms from the viewpoint of submanifold theory, Kodai Math. J. 33 (2010), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adachi, T., Maeda, S. and Yamagishi, M., Length spectrum of geodesic spheres in a non-flat complex space form, J. Math. Soc. Japan 54 (2002), 373–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M., Real hypersurfaces and complex submanifolds in complex projective space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 296 (1986), 137–149.Google Scholar
Klingenberg, W., Contributions to Riemannian geometry in the large, Ann. Math. 69(2) (1959), 654–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Vrancken, L. and Wang, X., A new characterization of the Berger sphere in complex projective space, J. Geom. Phys. 92 (2015), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Y., On real hypersurfaces of a complex projective space, J. Math. Soc. Japan 28 (1976), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebergall, R. and Ryan, P. J., Tight and taut submanifolds, in Real hypersurfaces in complex space forms (Cecil, T.E. and Chern, S.S., Editors) (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998), 233–305.Google Scholar
Takagi, R., On homogeneous real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space, Osaka J. Math. 10 (1973), 495–506.Google Scholar
Takagi, R., Real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space with constant principal curvatures II, J. Math. Soc. Japan 27 (1975), 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, A., Distance spheres in complex projective spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (1973), 649–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar