Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:26:44.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thrust systems of the Southwest Pyrenees and their control over basin subsidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. P. Turner  and
P. L. Hancock
J. P. Turner
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Department of Geology, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.
P. L. Hancock
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Department of Geology, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are two thrust systems in the Southwest Pyrenees: a NW-SE trending, thin-skin system exposed in the post-Triassic cover and a larger, thick-skin system of NE-SW thrusts in the Palaeozoic basement. The ‘cover’ thrust system propagated and migrated both southward and westward in response to the non-orthogonal collision of Iberia with Europe during Palaeogene mountain building. The ‘basement’ thrust system is interpreted to be a longer-lived structure, initiated during the extensional tectonic regime in mid Cretaceous time, and inverted during the main episode of Pyrenean collision. A model in which interaction of the two thrust systems controlled the timing and magnitude of thrust-induced, flexural subsidence is presented. The development of the basement thrust system caused regional subsidence along the South Pyrenean foreland margin that was subsequently halted by local uplift associated with the west-migratingcover thrust system.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 127 , Issue 5 , September 1990 , pp. 383 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, C. J. & Warburton, J. 1986. ‘Passive-roof’ duplex geometry in the frontal structures of the Kirthar and Sulaiman mountain belts, Pakistan. Journal of Structural Geology 8, 229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, C. 1978. The evolution of sedimentary basins on a visco-elastic lithosphere: theory and examples. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 55, 471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, C. 1981. Foreland basins. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 65, 291–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, S. E. & Elliott, D. 1982. Thrust systems. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 66, 1196–230.Google Scholar
Boillot, G. 1984. Some remarks on the continental margins in the Aquitaine and French Pyrenees. Geological Magazine 121, 407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, D. W., Beck, R. A., Hobbs, R., Raynolds, R. G. H. & Tahirkheli, R. A. K. 1989. Thrusting and gravel progradation in foreland basins: a test of post-thrusting gravel dispersal. Geology 16, 1143–6.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camara, P. & Klimowitz, J. 1985. Interpretacion geo-dinamica de la vertiente centro-occidental surpirenaica (Cuencas de Jaca-Tremp). Estudios Geologico 41, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, H. A. K. & Gagnon, L. G. 1985. Intercutaneous wedges, the triangle zone and structural thickening of the Mynheer Coal Seam at Coal Valley in the Rocky Mountain Foothills of central Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 33, 22–30.Google Scholar
Choukroune, P. 1976. Structure et évolution tectonique de la zone nord-Pyréneénne. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France 127, 1–116.Google Scholar
Choukroune, P. & Seguret, M. 1973. Tectonics of the Pyrenees: role of gravity and compression. In Gravity and Tectonics (eds de Jong, K. H. and Schollen, R.)., pp. 113–33. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Choukroune, P. & Mattauer, M. 1978. Tectonique de plaques et Pyrénées: sur le fonctionnement de la faille transformante nord-Pyrénéenne; comparaisons avec des modèles actuelles. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 20, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choukroune, P. & 31 others. 1988. The ECORS deep reflection seismic survey across the Pyrenees. Nature 331, 508–10.Google Scholar
Cuevas, M., Donselaar, M. E. & Nio, S. D. 1985. Eocene clastic tidal deposits in the Tremp-Graus basin (Provs of Lerida and Huesca), Excursion 6. In Sixth European Regional Meeting of the IAS Excursion Guidebook (eds Mila, M. D. and Rosell, J.)Google Scholar
Deramond, J., Fischer, M., Hossack, J., Labaume, P., Seguret, M., Soula, J.-C., Viallard, P. & Williams, G. 1984. Field guide of conference trip to the Pyrenees. Chavauchement et Déformation Conférence, Toulouse, 1–28.Google Scholar
Farrell, S. G., Williams, G. D. & Atkinson, C. D. 1987. Constraints on the age of movement of the Montsech and Cotiella thrusts, South-Central Pyrenees, Spain. Journal of the Geological Society of London 136, 39–46.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. D. 1987. Development of extensional and mixed-mode sedimentary basins. Continental Extensional Tectonics (eds Coward, M. P., Dewey, J. F. and Hancock, P. L.), pp. 19–33. Geological Society Specical Publication no. 28.Google Scholar
Gillchrist, R., Coward, M. & Mugnier, J.-L. 1987. Structural inversion and its controls: examples from the Alpine foreland and the French Alps. Geodinamica Acta (Paris) 1, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaud, S., Boillot, G., Colette, B., Mauffret, A., Miles, P. & Roberts, D. 1982. Western extension of the Iberian-European plate boundary during the early Cenozoic (Pyrenean) convergence: a new model. Marine Geology 45, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, A. B. & Graham, R. H. 1989. Some geometricalcharacteristics of inversion. In Inversion Tectonics (eds Cooper, M. A. and Williams, G. D.), pp. 17–39. Geological Society Special Publication no. 44.Google Scholar
Kusznir, N. & Karner, G. D. 1985. Dependence of the flexural rigidity of the continental lithosphere on rheology and temperature. Nature 316, 138–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labaume, P., Seguret, M. & Seyve, C. 1985. Evolution of a turbiditic foreland basin and analogy with an accretionary prism: example from the Eocene South Pyrenean basin. Tectonics 4, 661–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
le Pichon, X., Bonnin, J., Francheteau, J. & Sibuet, J. 1971. Une hypothèse d'évolution tectonique du Golfe de Gascogne. In Histoire Structural du Golfe de Gascogne (eds Debyser, J., le Pichon, X. and Montadert, L.), pp. 1–44. Technip.Google Scholar
Mattauer, M. & Henry, S. 1974. The Pyrenees. In Mesozoic-Cenozoic Orogenic Belts: Data for Orogenic Studies (ed. Spencer, A. M.), pp. 3–23. Geological Society of London Special Publication no. 4.Google Scholar
McCaig, A. 1986. Thick- and thin-skinned tectonics in the Pyrenees. Tectonophysics 129, 319–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, P. H. W., Nagtegaal, P. J. C., Roberti, K. J. & Harteelt, J. J. A. 1968. Lithostratigraphic subdivision of post-Hercynian deposits in the South-Central Pyrenees, Spain. Leidsche Geologische Mededelingen 41, 221–8.Google Scholar
Olivet, J. L., Bonnin, J., Beuzart, P. & Auzende, J. M. 1981. Cinématique de l' Atlantique nord et central. Centre National pour l' Exploitation des Océans. Paris, report nos 1–4.Google Scholar
Ori, G. G. & Friend, P. F. 1984. Sedimentary basins formed and carried piggyback on active thrust sheets. Geology 12, 475–8.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parish, M. 1984. A structural interpretation of a section throughthe Gavarnie nappe and its implications for Pyrenean geology. Journal of Structural Geology 6, 247–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peybernes, B. & Souquet, P. 1984. Basement blocks andtecto-sedimentary evolution in the Pyrenees during Mesozoic times. Geological Magazine 121, 397–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puigdefabregas, C. & Souquet, P. 1986. Tectosedimentary cycles and depositional sequences of the Mesozoic and Tertiary from the Pyrenees. Tectonophysics 129, 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puigdefabregas, C., Rupke, N. A. & Sole, Sedo J. 1975. The sedimentary evolution of the Jaca basin. In The Sedimentary Evolution of the Palaeogene South Pyrenean Basin (eds Rosell, J. and Puigdefabregas, C.), Excursion 19, part C. International Association of Sedimentologists, 9th International Congress Guidebook, Nice.Google Scholar
Ries, A. C. 1978. The opening of the Bay of Biscay – a review. Earth Science Reviews 14, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguret, M. 1972. Etude tectonique des nappes et séries decollées de la partie centrale du versant sud des Pyrénées. Série Géologique Structurale 21, Ustella, Montpellier, 155 pp.Google Scholar
Seguret, M. & Daignieres, M. 1986. Crustal-scale balanced cross sections of the Pyrenees. Tectonophysics 129, 303–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souquet, P. & Debroas, E. 1980. Tectogénèse et évolution des bassins de sedimentation dans le cycle alpin des Pyrenees. In Evolutions Géologique de la France (eds Autran, A. and Dercourt, J.), pp. 213–33. Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Mémoire 107.Google Scholar
Tchalenko, S. S. 1970. Similarities between shear zones of different magnitudes. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 81, 1625–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. P. 1990. Structural and stratigraphic evolution of th West Jaca thrust-top basin, Spanish Pyrenees. Journal of the Geological Societyof London 147, 177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Voo, R. 1969. Palaeomagnetic evidence for the rotation ofthe Iberian peninsula. Tectonophysics 7, 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1985. Thrust tectonics in the south central Pyrenees. Journal of Structural Geology 7, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. D. & Fischer, M. W. 1984. A balanced section across the Pyrenean orogenic belt. Tectonics 3, 773–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, D. V. & Dorr, J. A. 1983. Timing of deformation in overthrust belt and foreland of Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 67, 1304–22.Google Scholar
Woodcock, N. H. & Fischer, M. W. 1986. Strike-slip duplexes. Journal of Structural Geology 8, 725–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar