Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:40:26.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A model for marine shelf storm deposition in the Lower Cambrian Fucoid Beds of northwest Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Thomas McKie
Thomas McKie
Affiliation:
Badley, Ashton & Associates Limited, Winceby House, Winceby, Horncastle, Lincolnshire LN9 6PB, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Lower Cambrian Fucoid Beds of northwest Scotland are a 20 m thick mixed clastic-carbonate sequence of thinly bedded storm beds deposited on the western margin of the Iapetus Ocean. Proximal facies display plane beds, current ripple laminations and wave ripple laminations and were deposited under the influence of combined steady andoscillatory currents. The steady component of flow appears to have expanded in an offshore direction and weakened during the final stages of storm deposition with respect to the oscillatory component, producing less asymmetrical ripples with less evidence of a preferred migration direction. Distal facies are represented by thin ‘graded rhythmites’. The palaeocurrent data suggest a wide spread of sediment transport directions, but with a north to northeasterly mode which may reflect a geostrophic component of flow. Following storms these beds were burrowed and echinoderms colonized the sea floor, although the limited extent of these processes and the presence of abundant collophane suggests that the fairweather Fucoid Beds shelf was generally quiescent and possibly dysaerobic.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 45 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aigner, T. 1985. Storm Depositional Systems: Springer-Verlag. 174 pp.Google Scholar
Aigner, T. & Reineck, H. E. 1982. Proximality trendsin modern storm sands from the Helgoland Bight (North Sea) and their implications for basin analysis. Sencken-bergiana Maritima 14, 183–215.Google Scholar
Anderton, R. 1976. Tidal shelf sedimentation: an example from the Scottish Dalradian. Sedimentology 23, 429–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenchley, P. J. & Newall, G. 1982. Storm influenced inner-shelf sand lobes in the Caradoc (Ordovician) of Shropshire, England. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 52, 1257–69.Google Scholar
Brenchley, P. J. & Pickerill, R. K. 1980. Shallow subtidal sediments of Soudleyan (Caradoc) age in the Berwyn Hills, north Wales, and their palaeogeographic context. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 91, 177–94.Google Scholar
Byers, C. W. & Dott, R. H. 1981. S.E.P.M. research conference on modern and ancient cratonic sedimentation – the orthoquartzite-carbonate suite revisited. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51, 329–47.Google Scholar
De Raaf, J. F. M., Boersma, J. R. & Van Gelder, A. 1977. Wave generated structures and sequences from a shallow marine succession, Lower Carboniferous, County Cork, Ireland. Sedimentology 24, 451–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadow, S. & Reineck, H. E. 1969. Ablandiger sand transport bei sturmfluten. Senckenbergiana Maritima 1, 63–78.Google Scholar
Grant, W. D. & Madsden, O. S. 1979. Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom. Journal of Geophysical Research 84, 1797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M. O. 1967. Hurricanes as geological agents, South Texas coast. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 51, 937–42.Google Scholar
Kumar, N. & Sanders, J. E. 1976. Characteristics of shoreface storm deposits: modern and ancient examples. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 46, 145–62Google Scholar
Matthews, S. C. & Cowie, J. W. 1979. Early Cambrian transgression. Journal of the Geological Society of London 136, 133–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, J. M. 1982. Storm-surge-ebb origin of hummocky cross-stratified units of the Andrews Mountain Member, Campito Formation (Lower Cambrian), White-Inyo Mountains, Eastern California. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 52, 941–58.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & James, N. P. 1980. The Hawke Bay Event: a circum-Iapetus regression near the Lower Middle Cambrian Boundary, In The Caledonides in the U.S.A. (ed. Wones, D. R.), pp. 15–18. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Memoir no. 2.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1979. Caledonian echinoderms of the British Isles, In The Caledonides of the British isles-Reviewed (eds. Harris, A. L., Holland, C. H. and Leake, B. E.), 453–6. Geological Society of London Special Publication no. 8.Google Scholar
Reineck, H. E. & Singh, I. R. 1971. Genesis of laminated sand and graded rhythmites in storm layers of shelf mud. Sedimentology 18, 123–8.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1982. Distinctive features of sandy tempestites. In Cyclic and Event Stratification (eds Einsele, G. and Seilacher, A.), 333–49. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, J. W. & Nummedal, D. in press. Sand transport kinematics on the Texas continental shelf during Hurricane Carla, September 1961. In Shelf Sedimentation, Shelf Sequences and Related Hydrocarbon Accumulations(eds Morton, R. A. and Nummedal, D.), 000–000. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Research Congress, Gulf Coast Section of Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. W., Nummedal, D. & Amos, A. F. 1988. Storm and fairweather combined flow on the central Texas continental shelf. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 58, 580–95.Google Scholar
Swett, K. 1981. Cambro-Ordovician strata in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen and their palaeotectonic significance. Geological Magazine 118, 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swett, K. & Smit, D. E. 1972. Palaeogeography and depositional environments of the Cambro-Ordovician shallow marine fades of the North Atlantic. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 83, 3223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, D. J. P. & Freeland, G. L. 1978. Current lineations and sandwaves on the Inner Shelf, Middle Atlantic Bight of North America. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 48, 1257–66.Google Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., Han, G. & Vincent, C. E. 1986. Fluid processes and sea floor response on a modern storm dominated shelf: middle Atlantic Sh0elf of North America. Part I, the storm current regime. In Shelf Sands and Sandstone Reservoirs (eds Knight, R. J. and McLean, J. R.), 99–119. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 11.Google Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., Thorne, J. A. & Oertel, G. F. (1986). Fluid processes and sea floor response on a modern storm dominated shelf: middle AtlanticShelf of North America. Part II: response of the shelf floor. In Shelf Sands and Sandstone Reservoirs (eds Knight, R. J. and McLean, J. R.), 191–211. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 11.Google Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., Figueiredo, A. G., Freeland, G. L. & Oertel, G. F. 1983. Hummocky cross-stratification and megaripples: a geological double standard? Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 53, 1295–1318.Google Scholar
Tunbridge, L. P. 1983. The Middle Devonian shoreline in North Devon, England. Journal of the Geological Society of London 140, 147–58.Google Scholar
Wilde, P. 1987. Model of progressive ventilation of the Late Precambrian-Early Cambrian ocean. American Journal of Science 287, 442–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar