Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:02:33.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silurian trilobites from arctic Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. T. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston in Birmingham, Gospa Green, Birmingam B4 7ET
G. M. Narbonne
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 6N5

Summary

Trilobites of upper Ludlow age are described from Member A of the Read Bay Formation on Cornwallis Island. Four new species are represented: Helokybe spio gen. et sp.nov. (Dechenellinae), Encrinurus hyperboreus sp. nov., Kailia? capra sp.nov. (Encrinurinae) and Hemiarges echinatus sp.nov. Other taxa present are: an effaced scutelluid; Cyphaspis sp.; a warburgelline; two more encrinurids; two other forms of Hemiarges. The trilobites occur in sediments indicative of a shallow subtidal environment, with the exception of the warburgelline which occurs in sediments deposited under deeper subtidal conditions below storm wave-base.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, G. K. B. 1969. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mitteldevons. I. Mit Beiträgen zur Silur-Devon-Stratigraphie einige Gebiete Marokkos and Oberfrankens. Abhe senckenb. naturforsch. Ges. 520, 1692, pls 1–52.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica. I. Crustacea formationis transitionis. Fasc. 2, 21–92, pls 2541. Lund.Google Scholar
Berdan, J. M. 1969. Possible ecologic significance of leperditiid ostracods. Geol. Soc. Am. Northeastern Section, Program, p. 17.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1965. Trilobites from upper Silurian rocks of the Canadian arctic archipelago: Encrinurus (Frammia), and Hemiarges. Bull. geol. Surv. Can. 134. 114, pls 1–3.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt: nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. 147 pp., 6 pls. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burskij, A. Z. 1970. Early Ordovician trilobites of north Pai-Khoja. Pp. 96138, pls 1–16. In Bondarev, V. I. (ed.). Generalities concerning the Ordovician of Pai-Khoja, Vajgach, and south Novaja Zemlya. Nauchnoissled. Inst. Geol. Arktiki. (Russian.)Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1967. Trilobites of the Henryhouse Formation (Silurian) in Oklahoma. Bull. Okla. geol. Surv. 115, 168, pls 1–19.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-T. 1974. In A Handbook of the Stratigraphy and Paleontology in Southwest China. Edited by the Nanking Institute of Geology and Paleontology Academia Sinica. Science Press. iii+454 pp., 202 pls. (Chinese.)Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1971. Taxonomy and ontogeny of Siluro-Devonian trilobites from near Yass, New South Wales. Palaeontographica A 137, 1108, 24 pls.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. & Perry, D. G. 1977. Lochkovian trilobites and conodonts from northwestern Canada. J. Paleont. 51, 772–96, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1971. Some trilobites from the Silurian/Devonian boundary beds of Czechoslovakia. Palaeontology 14, 159–77, pls. 19–24.Google Scholar
Churkin, M. 1961. Silurian trilobites from the Klamath Mountains, California. J. Paleont. 35, 168–75, pls. 35, 36.Google Scholar
Elkin, E. A. 1974. In Elkin, E. A. & Zheltonogova, V. A.. The most ancient dechenellids (trilobites) and Silurian stratigraphy of the Altai Mountains. Trud Inst. Geol. Geofiz. sib. Otd., issue 130, 111 pp., 13 pls. (Russian.)Google Scholar
Emmrich, H. F. 1844. Zur Naturgeschichte der Trilobiten. Programm zur öfentlichen Prüfung, welche mit den Zöglingen der Realschule in Meiningen Donnerstag dem 28, und Freitag den 29. März 1844 im grossen Hörsaale der Anstalt abgehaben werden soll, etc. 28 (?) pp., 1 pl. Meiningen.Google Scholar
Evitt, W. R. & Tripp, R. P. 1977. Silicified middle Ordovician trilobites from the families Encrinuridae and Staurocephalidae. Palaeontographica A 157, 109–74. 24 pls.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. W. 1850. Observations on Dudley trilobites. Part 2. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 6, 402–5, pl. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibling, M. R. & Narbonne, G. M. 1977. Siluro-Devonian sedimentation on Somerset and Cornwallis islands, arctic Canada. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 25, 1145–56.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A. 1843. Systematische Übersicht der Trilobiten und Beschreibung einiger neuen Arten derselben. Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paläont. for 1843, 537–67, pls 4–6.Google Scholar
Gürich, G. 1901. Über eine neue Lichas-Art aus dem Devon von Neu-Süd Wales and über die Gattung Lichas überhaupt. Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paläont. 14, 484539, pls 18–20.Google Scholar
Hall, J. & Clarke, J. M. 1888. Trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, upper Heldeberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill Groups. N.Y. State Geol. Survey, Palaeont. N.Y. 7, Ixiv+236 pp., 36 pls.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. 176 pp., 7 pls. Prague. (Also 1848. Abh. K. böhm. Ges. Wiss. 5, 117292, pls 1–7.)Google Scholar
Jones, B. 1974. A biometrical analysis of Atrypella foxi n.sp. from the Canadian Arctic. J. Paleont. 48, 963–77. 2 pls.Google Scholar
Jones, B. & Dixon, O. A. 1976. Storm deposits in the Read Bay Formation (upper Silurian), Somerset Island, arctic Canada (an application of Markov Chain Analysis). J. sedim. Petrol. 46, 393401.Google Scholar
Kayser, E. 1880. Dechenella. eine Devonische Gruppe der Gattung Phillipsia. Z. dt. geol. Ges. 32, 703–7. pl. 27.Google Scholar
Kuo, H-T. 1962. Some Silurian trilobites from the Er-Tao-Gou Group of Jilin. Acta palaeont. sin. 10, 369–85, 2 pls. (Chinese, with English summary.)Google Scholar
Lane, P. D. 1972. New trilobites from the Silurian of north-east Greenland, with a note on trilobite faunas in pure limestones. Palaeontology 15, 336–64, pls 59–64.Google Scholar
Lane, P. D. & Thomas, A. T. 1978. Silurian trilobites from north-east Queensland and the classification of effaced trilobites. Geol. Mag. 115, 351–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. D. & Thomas, A. T. (in the press). Family Scutelluidae. In Thomas, A. T. British Wenlock trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.]: (1).Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1976. The sensory fields and life mode of Phacops rana (Green, 1832) (Trilobita). Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 69 (16), 337–67, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H. 1840. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux. 3, 638 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed.). 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropods I. xix+560 pp., 415 figs. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press (Lawrence).Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1967. Lower and middle Devonian trilobites of the Canadian arctic islands. Bull. geol. Surv. Can. 153, 148 pp., 17 pls.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1975(a). Humeia, new middle Devonian trilobite from western Canada. J. Paleont. 49, 494500, I pl.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1975(b). Siegenian trilobite zoogeography in arctic North America. Fossils & Strata, no. 4, 391–8. 5 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1976. New middle Devonian trilobites from northwestern Canada. J. Paleont. 50, 1162–74, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Owens, R. M. 1973. British Ordovician and Silurian Proetidae (Trilobita). Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.], 98 pp., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Owens, R. M. & Thomas, A. T. 1975. Radnoria, a new Silurian proetacean trilobite, and the origins of the Brachymetopidae. Palaeontology 18, 809–22, pls 95, 96.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G. & Chatterton, B. D. E. 1977. Silurian (Wenlockian) trilobites from Baillie-Hamilton Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Can. J. Earth Sci. 14, 285317, 7 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prantl, F. & Přibyl, A. 1951. A revision of the Bohemian representatives of the Family Otarionidae R. and E. Richter (Trilobitae). Stát. geol. Üst. Česk. Rep. 17 (for 1950), 353512, 5 pls. (Czech and English text, Russian summary.)Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. 1946. Příspěvek k poznání českých Proetiduů. Rozpr. české Akad. Vêd. Umêni 55 (10), 37 pp., 4 pls. (Notes on the recognition of the Bohemian Proetidae.) Bull. int. Acad. tchéque Sci. 46 (10), 41 pp., (4 pls.)Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1902. Notes on the genus Lichas Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 58, 5982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1914. The Lower Palaeozoic trilobites of Girvan. Supplement. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.] 56 pp., 8 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, R. 1912. Beiträge zur Kenntnis devonischer Trilobiten. Erster Beitrag. Die Gattung Dechenella und einige verwandte Formen. Abh. senckenb. naturforsch. Ges. 488, 243340, pls. 18–21.Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1950. Arten der Dechenellinae (Tril.). Senckenbergiana 31, 151–84, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1955. Scutelluidae n.n. (Tril.) durch ‘kleine Anderung’ eines Familien-Namens Wegen Homonymie. Senckenberg. leth. 36, 291–3.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1976. The sequence of Silurian graptolite zones in the British Isles. Geol. J. 11, 153–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian formations. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.]: (1), 180, pls 1–6.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1885. Revision der Ostbaltischen Silurischen Trilobiten, Abt. 2. Acidaspiden and Lichiden. Mém. Acad. imp. Sci. St-Pétersb. (7), 33, no. 1, 127 pp., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Schrank, E. 1972. Proetacea, Encrinuridae und Phacopina (Trilobita) aus silurischen Geschieben. Geologie 76, 1117, 21 pls.Google Scholar
Temple, J. T. 1972. Ontogenies of Devonian trilobites from New South Wales. (Review of Chatterton, 1971.) Geol. Mag. 109, 373–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. T. (in the press). British Wenlock trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.]: (1).Google Scholar
Thomas, A. T. & Owens, R. M. 1978. A review of the trilobite family Aulacopleuridae. Palaeontology 21, 6581, pl. 7.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. 1958. Cornwallis and Little Cornwallis islands, District of Franklin, North-west Territories. Mem. geol. Surv. Can. 294, 134 pp.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. & Kerr, J. W. 1968. Cornwallis Island and adjacent smaller islands, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Pap. geol. Surv. Can. 67–64, v+16 pp.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1957. The classification and evolution of the superfamily Lichacea (Trilobita). Geol. Mag. 94, 104–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1958. Stratigraphical and geographical distribution of the named species of the superfamily Lichacea. J. Paleont. 32, 574–82, pl. 85.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P., Temple, J. T. & Gass, K. C. 1977. The Silurian trilobite Encrinurus variolaris and allied species, with notes on Frammia. Palaeontology 20, 847–67, pls 113–15.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T. T. 1977. Summary of conodont biostratigraphy of the Read Bay Formation at its type sections and adjacent areas, eastern Cornwallis Island, District of Franklin. Pap. geol. Surv. Can. 77–1 B, 211–16, pl. 41–1.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata telluris Suecanae. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. Upsal. 8 (for 1821), 1116, pls 1–4.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1961. Silurian Hemiarges (Trilobita) from Cornwallis Island and New York State. J. Paleont. 35, 433–44, pls 55–7.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Campbell, K. S. W. 1967. Silicified Silurian trilobites from Maine. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 135, 447–83, 19 pls.Google Scholar